--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 7/9/05 5:53 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> Another one:
> >>
> >> Many mistakes in the entry below. no time now but
on 7/9/05 5:53 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Another one:
>>
>> Many mistakes in the entry below. no time now but for starters, I
> DID
>> interview Vishnudevananda in depth and had a research assistant
What claim did I make about Swami Vasudevananda? I only repeated what
Anoop Chandola said Swami Brahmandanda told him in a response to a
question about MMY.
What does my source disagree about? Anoop Chandola said it was a good
summary of the politics surrounding the succession to Gurudev's
pos
2005 at 11:40 AM
> wrote:
>
>
> >More grist for the mill:
> >
> >-- Forwarded Message
> >From: sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To:
> >Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:33:04 -0000
> >To:
> >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Jyot
Dana's response:
Rick,
only time for a moment of response to this guy's nonsense below.
He isn't offering any compelling argument in support of Vasudevananda's
claim other than "he said, she said." A comment from Shantananda, whether
it was made or not, is only one comment in a sea of comments
the mill:
>
>-- Forwarded Message
>From: sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To:
>Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:33:04 -
>To:
>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Jyotirmath Shankaracharya Lineage in the
>20th Century
>
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tu
on 7/2/05 12:44 PM, lurkernomore20002000 at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> "Ahh, what's so special about cheesemakers?"
>>>
>>> "Well, obviously this is not meant to be taken literally.
>>> It refers to any manufactur
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >"Ahh, what's so special about cheesemakers?"
> >
> > "Well, obviously this is not meant to be taken literally.
> > It refers to any manufacturers of dairy products."
>
> Right. Such as Jesus Cheeses, Inc.
I think it
on 7/2/05 2:35 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I haven't really been following all these pissing contest
>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I haven't really been following all these pissing contest
> > posts, and I've never been on AMT. I just want to say that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I haven't really been following all these pissing contest posts, and
I've
> never been on AMT. I just want to say that aside from posts at which
you
> snipe at one another, everything I've read by Vaj, Unc, and Jud
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 1, 2005, at 12:16 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> You seem to not be aware of a number of things 1) the
Shankaracharya
> is
> not necessarily the one who chooses his successor
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> So the successor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL
on 7/1/05 2:36 PM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Jul 1, 2005, at 1:02 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
>> Who is a playground bully on AMT and who is a playground bully here?
>
> I think you're smart enough to figure that out yourself in regards to
> AMT as you spend a lot of time there.
>
> As f
On Jul 1, 2005, at 1:02 PM, sparaig wrote:
> Who is a playground bully on AMT and who is a playground bully here?
I think you're smart enough to figure that out yourself in regards to
AMT as you spend a lot of time there.
As far as here goes, it's a different place so I don't know that the
co
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I may have been *incorrect* to assume Vaj was
> referring to the narrow issue of Chandola's
> account of his conversation with Shantanand,
> but y
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > However your claim that the Shankaracharaya lin
response to it.)
> From: Peter Sutphen
> Date: Thu Jun 30, 2005 4:57 pm
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Jyotirmath Shankaracharya
Lineage
> in the 20th Century drpetersutphen
> Offline Offline
> Send Email Send Email
> Boy, has this turned into a massive pissing contest
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Your response provides some interesting context f
"ranting" was indeed a bit strong (though I think acceptable in the
loose conversationa use of the word). I apologize for the
characterization and its possible more formal interpretation.]
---
Original post upon which Judy commented.
From: Peter Sutphe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 1, 2005, at 12:09 PM, anonymousff wrote:
>
> > I like your posts, and they often provide insight. However, on
this
> > point, your implied casting of Vaj as incorrect -- not telling
the
> > truth -- makes me ponde
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> But even if he had said It has "'raged on' 'in AMT' for a while, I
> dont see that that connates either currently or continuously.
"Has raged on AMT for a while" does indeed
suggest that it's ongoing there.
But in an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Jun 30, 2005, at 5:57 PM, Peter Sutphen wrote:
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 1, 2005, at 12:09 PM, anonymousff wrote:
>
> > I like your posts, and they often provide insight. However, on this
> > point, your implied casting of Vaj as incorrect -- not telling the
> > truth -- makes me ponder
On Jul 1, 2005, at 12:16 PM, sparaig wrote:
You seem to not be aware of a number of things 1) the Shankaracharya
is
not necessarily the one who chooses his successor
>>>
>>>
>>> So the successor is generally chosen over the wishes of the
>>> Shankaracharya?
>>
>> That's not what I
On Jul 1, 2005, at 12:09 PM, anonymousff wrote:
> I like your posts, and they often provide insight. However, on this
> point, your implied casting of Vaj as incorrect -- not telling the
> truth -- makes me ponder you may certainly have some quite different
> standard for truth than most. And
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > Thanks Unc. I appreciate the clarification...
> > >
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECT
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Jun 30, 2005, at 5:57 PM, Peter Sutphen wrote:
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <>
> They feel that gratitude *simultaneously*
> to feeling doubts about him or confusion about some
> of the silly-ass things he's don
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 1, 2005, at 11:46 AM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jul 1, 2005, at 10:55 AM, sparaig wrote:
> >>
> >>> MY position comes from Anoop Chandola's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 30, 2005, at 5:57 PM, Peter Sutphen wrote:
> >
> > > Boy, has this turned into a massive pissing contest!
> >
> > Well it has raged
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Please give reference to an account that says that Swami Shanta
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<>
They feel that gratitude *simultaneously*
to feeling doubts about him or confusion about some
of the silly-ass things he's done and continues to do.
<>
Unc
Exactly! Just want to highlight this. It's these two co
On Jul 1, 2005, at 11:46 AM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 1, 2005, at 10:55 AM, sparaig wrote:
MY position comes from Anoop Chandola's conversation with his
meditation teacher,
Swami Shantananda Saraswati, closest disciple of Swami B
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Crux of this issue is found at the very end. If you can't stand
> my ranting, at least read
> > the last paragraph or two at the end o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please give reference to an account that says that Swami Shantananda
was NOT the closest
> disciple of Gurudev...
And if you would, please give re
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 1, 2005, at 10:55 AM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > MY position comes from Anoop Chandola's conversation with his
> > meditation teacher,
> > Swami Shantananda Saraswati, closest disciple of Swami Brahamanda
> > Saraswati, A
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks Unc. I appreciate the clarification...
> >
> > I'm not on your shit list now, by any chance, am I?
> >
> > Snicker...
>
> Never have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Crux of this issue is found at the very end. If you can't stand
my ranting, at least read
> the last paragraph or two at the end of my response.
FWIW, I think you may have written "Brahmananda"
instead of "Shantana
On Jul 1, 2005, at 10:55 AM, sparaig wrote:
> MY position comes from Anoop Chandola's conversation with his
> meditation teacher,
> Swami Shantananda Saraswati, closest disciple of Swami Brahamanda
> Saraswati, AKA
> "Gurudev" on this forum. No account denies that Swami Shantananda
> Saraswati
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Unc. I appreciate the clarification...
>
> I'm not on your shit list now, by any chance, am I?
>
> Snicker...
Never have been, man. Really. I've just been
trying to point out that you've essentially
trotted out
Thanks Unc. I appreciate the clarification...
I'm not on your shit list now, by any chance, am I?
Snicker...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogro
The Crux of this issue is found at the very end. If you can't stand my ranting,
at least read
the last paragraph or two at the end of my response.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 30, 2005, at 5:57 PM, Peter Sutphen wrote:
>
> > Boy, has this tur
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 30, 2005, at 5:57 PM, Peter Sutphen wrote:
>
> > Boy, has this turned into a massive pissing contest!
>
> Well it has raged on AMT for a while as well.
No, it hasn't.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PRO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > Doubtful, since neither I nor Anoop Chandola ever disagreed
On Jun 30, 2005, at 5:57 PM, Peter Sutphen wrote:
> Boy, has this turned into a massive pissing contest!
Well it has raged on AMT for a while as well.
> I
> think everybody that cares needs to come to their own
> conclusion in this matter and recognize that any
> legitimate authority in one si
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Doubtful, since neither I nor Anoop Chandola ever disagreed with
> > him on anything. You obviously didn't read the entire thing I wrote
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doubtful, since neither I nor Anoop Chandola ever disagreed with
> him on anything. You obviously didn't read the entire thing I wrote
> below.
Uh, and that doesn't *tell* you anything? :-)
To subscribe, send a m
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Boy, has this turned into a massive pissing contest! I
> think everybody that cares needs to come to their own
> conclusion in this matter and recognize that any
> legitimate authority in one side's eyes will not be
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Boy, has this turned into a massive pissing contest! I
> think everybody that cares needs to come to their own
> conclusion in this matter and recognize that any
> legitimate authority in one side's eyes will not be
>
Boy, has this turned into a massive pissing contest! I
think everybody that cares needs to come to their own
conclusion in this matter and recognize that any
legitimate authority in one side's eyes will not be
legitimate in the other side's eye. A matter of
emotionally invested position. And by the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 6/30/05 4:01 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Sorry I can't reply to an original post in this thread, but I've
> > delete
on 6/30/05 4:01 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sorry I can't reply to an original post in this thread, but I've
> deleted it,
>
> BTW, why did you delete the original thread? Is this normal to do after
> a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry I can't reply to an original post in this thread, but I've
deleted it,
BTW, why did you delete the original thread? Is this normal to do after
a certain point? Seems to me that there are threads thatgo back all
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 6/30/05 3:43 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to hear what Dana Sawyer says when you quote all this (plus
> > whatever face-saving commentary you add, of course).
>
> I won't add any, since I
on 6/30/05 3:43 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'd like to hear what Dana Sawyer says when you quote all this (plus
> whatever face-saving commentary you add, of course).
I won't add any, since I don't have a vested interest in this debate and
know little about it. I'll just forward
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Swami Shantananda's response was to laugh and say "Let me put it to
> you this way: he would have been my first choice as my sucessor but
> they would allow it due to the caste laws."
Should read "they would not a
LOL. Talk about making sure that you get the response you're looking
for.
Tell him that Anoop Chandola is a guy who learned to meditate from
Swami Shantananda during the period when MMY was with the Beatles,
because his family had religious clout in Northern India (who chose
to meet with Swami
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > People have lots of recollections too. One of
> I like the idea that moral development must precede higher spiritual
> attainments. Otherwise those attainments can be misused. I wonder whether
> this is a recommendation or a requirement.
Originally it was a requirement for even learning knowledge period. But
typically a teacher
assesses th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > People have lots of recollections too. One of
> > mine is that what Sparaig just said about the
> > TM-Sidhis culturing Unity comes dir
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTE
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > on 6/19/05 7:26 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In other
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTE
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > on 6/19/05 7:26 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In other
--- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > on 6/19/05 7:26 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > In other words--it's a lot deeper that simple
> meditation this path,
> and
> > > yogic siddhis will block
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 6/19/05 7:26 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > In other words--it's a lot deeper that simple meditation this path,
and
> > yogic siddhis will block the path.
>
> So do you think MMY knew this and wanted t
On Jun 19, 2005, at 1:22 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
>> I once heard a story, possibly from someone who witnessed the
>> incident (but
>> I'm not sure) that Maharishi and a few of his disciples were visiting
>> another guru and a few of his. The other guru told one of his
>> disciples to
>> go into
On Jun 19, 2005, at 1:05 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
> I like the idea that moral development must precede higher spiritual
> attainments. Otherwise those attainments can be misused. I wonder
> whether
> this is a recommendation or a requirement. We see so many examples of
> people
> who apparently
The oldest and most profound ethical standard is: "Do not do anything
to others, that you do not want others to do to you". I would not
trust anybody as Enlightened, if they do not live according to that
standard. In my eyes it includes no lies, not steal, not cheat and
also not experiment with
on 6/19/05 12:05 PM, Rick Archer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> on 6/19/05 11:34 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
>>
>>> on 6/19/05 7:26 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words--it's a lot deeper that simple medita
on 6/19/05 11:34 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Jun 19, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
>
>> on 6/19/05 7:26 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>> In other words--it's a lot deeper that simple meditation this path,
>>> and
>>> yogic siddhis will block the path.
>>
>> So
On Jun 19, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
> on 6/19/05 7:26 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> In other words--it's a lot deeper that simple meditation this path,
>> and
>> yogic siddhis will block the path.
>
> So do you think MMY knew this and wanted to block people's CC, or
> d
on 6/19/05 7:26 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In other words--it's a lot deeper that simple meditation this path, and
> yogic siddhis will block the path.
So do you think MMY knew this and wanted to block people's CC, or disagreed
with it and felt the sidhis would culture CC?
To su
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 6/18/05 1:19 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> on 6/18/05 12:47 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> If I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > on 6/18/05 12:47 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/18/05 1:19 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> on 6/18/05 12:47 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
If I am
missing relevant info on Chandol, plese provide it.
>>>
>>> Done.
>>>
>>
On Jun 18, 2005, at 10:53 AM, akasha_108 wrote:
> (vaj: I have this work, it is excellent if you are interested in this
> kind of thing.)
No, I already have a copy, thanks.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'J
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > on 6/18/05 12:47 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Plus 8 scholarly books [by chandol] on linguistics and music. What
has Dana Saw
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 6/18/05 12:47 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> If I am
> >> missing relevant info on Chandol, plese provide it.
> >>
> >
> > Done.
> >
> "Discovering Brides by Anoop Chandola"
>
> That settles it. H
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 6/18/05 12:47 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> If I am
> >> missing relevant info on Chandol, plese provide it.
> >>
> >
> > Done.
> >
> "Discovering Brides by Anoop Chandola"
>
> That settles it. H
on 6/18/05 12:47 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> If I am
>> missing relevant info on Chandol, plese provide it.
>>
>
> Done.
>
"Discovering Brides by Anoop Chandola"
That settles it. He's the ultimate authority on the Shankaracharya
controversy.
To subscribe, send a message to:
on 6/18/05 12:31 AM, akasha_108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dana Sawyer travels to India almost yearly, and interviews 100s of
> swamis, teachers, shakaracharas regularly.
Sorry I haven't weighed in on this discussion. I'm now 462 posts behind. I
feel like that guy in "Master and Commander" wh
85 matches
Mail list logo
