On Jun 3, 2009, at 2:24 AM, emptybill wrote:
And Bill thanks for trying to elevate me to guru, but you have no
clue what my credentials and authorizations are, because I've never
discussed them with. So stop spreading lies about what you think my
credentials and authorizations might be. It'
On Jun 2, 2009, at 1:21 PM, emptybill wrote:
No doubt, just for Vaj, they must have brushed off Adi-Shankara's
disagreement with Pancharatra theology as discussed in his
Brahmasutra Bhasya. Thus his now it can be told - this is more
insider revelation that only Vaj-duta would claim.
I
On Jun 2, 2009, at 2:58 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
wrote:
On Jun 1, 2009, at 11:36 AM, Randy Meltzer wrote:
Thanks Vaj for saying that. I am not here to do the
"pile on Vaj" thing. Its just when you make statements
like "the shankaracharya ord
On Jun 1, 2009, at 11:46 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
Well lets see. I have been to Guru Dev's ashram in Allahabad 4
times. The last time was this past April, but Vasudevanandaji was
not there so it was pretty quiet. I just walked around a bit
On Jun 1, 2009, at 11:36 AM, Randy Meltzer wrote:
Thanks Vaj for saying that. I am not here to do the "pile on Vaj"
thing. Its just when you make statements like "the shankaracharya
order is Vaishnavite" and my experience is s the oposite I had
to chime in.
I couldn't agree more, Ra
On Jun 1, 2009, at 12:36 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote:
>>
>> Depends on a number of things really Lurk. A big one for me is 'what
>> do I perceive as their underlying intention?'. Another is 'is this
>> just another "pile on" post? I'm not a fan of digital rugby. Do I
>> have enough time and is it wor
On May 31, 2009, at 9:26 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
"Randy Meltzer" wrote:
Any comments Vaj?
I have noticed sometimes at this point the call gets dropped.
Depends on a number of things really Lurk. A big one for me is 'what
do I perceive as their underlying intention?'. Another
On Jun 1, 2009, at 1:17 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Lurk, do *you* "stay on the line" when the
person on the other end clearly has his dick
out of his pants waving it around and saying,
"Can you match this, bozo?"
I don't know about you, but I tend to get a
little tired of the heavy breathing on the
On Jun 1, 2009, at 1:23 AM, Randy Meltzer wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
Vaj,
Again you make the statement that the tradition is not Shaivite.
On what basis are you saying this? Have you been to Jyotir Math?
Have you been to Guru Dev's ashram in Allahabad?
It woul
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 5:50 PM, shukra69 wrote:
> Don't think he has an employer to worry about , he would be self employed at
> a Colorado Shamballa center or selling paraphenalia
> http://www.odiyana.com/contact_us.php
>
But Vaj says that he has to be very careful to conceal his identity
beca
On May 31, 2009, at 7:20 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill"
wrote:
Hey empty bill
Thanks for your words of encouragement. I have already had a
previous run in with Mr. Vaj. When I said in a previous post that
as far as I am concerned, I have ex
On May 31, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
Yes I have read Bhaja Govindam. Shankara is famous for being an
advaita teacher but also having the ability to have the devotional
aspect of bhakti. Just because he refers to Govinda in th
On May 31, 2009, at 11:13 AM, Randy Meltzer wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
Vaj,
What makes you think that the shankaracharya tradition is a
"vaishnavite" group?
Because the guru-parampara originates with Narayana and Shankara was a
Vaishnavite.
Have you read S
On May 30, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Marek Reavis wrote:
Like Judy pointed out, it's totally common for Indian devotees to
extol assumed enlightened saints and gurus with over the top
honorifics, and the idea that one of Maharishi's early followers
gave him that designation out of their own rever
On May 30, 2009, at 5:31 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
On May 30, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Marek Reavis wrote:
The only thing I ever heard Maharishi say about it was that "people"
started using it, and he didn't object.
Exactly. So someone must be lying.
On May 30, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Marek Reavis wrote:
Not necessarily, but that's not the point. However he got the
honorific, Maharishi certainly felt it was appropriate and never
demurred. Many agreed with him and lots didn't.
Sorry to be a stickler but you're assuming it's honorific withou
On May 30, 2009, at 12:01 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis"
wrote:
Like you, I've only read the few chapters of Coplin's
dissertation that appear in a google search. I'd like
to read the res
On May 30, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Marek Reavis wrote:
> The only thing I ever heard Maharishi say about it was that "people"
> started using it, and he didn't object.
Exactly. So someone must be lying.
On May 29, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Marek Reavis wrote:
> Jay Randolph Coplin, in his dissertation on the history of the SRM,
> writes that in an interview with the then-Shankaracharya of Jyotir
> Math, Vasudevananda (the successor to Guru Dev's successor,
> Shantanand, and predecessor of the cur
On May 29, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Jason wrote:
I want to know who gave him the title *Maharishi* .??
Why does he put his bald head in all the org's emblems.??
I think he was a good meditation teacher, but a very poor
Philosophy teacher.!!
Paradoxicaly, I know many go
On May 29, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Yeah, compared to S.N. Goenka, the Marshy is a
sheer genius at meditation! There's a lot of
difference between transcendental meditation
and mood-making with concentration on various
human body parts.
Vaj wrote:
Similar techniques are
21 matches
Mail list logo
