John Poelstra wrote:
Has a final date been picked to decide the final theme? If so, what is
it?
I believe Mo mentioned 21 September as the final date, but don't listen to
me, I am at FUDCon with too much Czech beer...
--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Hi,
I've put together first version of a list of icons that need to be done
to fill the gaps in icon naming specs and I'm going to look into Desktop
Live Spin to see which of them are actually displayed there. I attach
the list and will transfer it gradually to wiki together with the check
of
On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 14:49 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
Hi,
I've put together first version of a list of icons that need to be done
to fill the gaps in icon naming specs and I'm going to look into Desktop
Live Spin to see which of them are actually displayed there. I attach
the list and
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139
--- Comment #3 from Subhodip Biswas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-07 11:13:25
EDT ---
ok ..will do it
--
Configure bugmail:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461223
--- Comment #3 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-07 19:32:22 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #1)
Has it been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461223
Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460090
Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461039
Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461282
Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461223
--- Comment #4 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-07 20:18:10 EDT
---
According to George Williams (fontforge
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461223
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-07 20:24:36 EDT ---
Well, we dislike updating fontforge in stable
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461282
--- Comment #3 from Cody Boisclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-07 20:35:43 EDT
---
Still getting a Forbidden error on all
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461282
Cody Boisclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461223
--- Comment #6 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-07 20:39:17 EDT
---
This bug is not a critical one: you just
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461282
Cody Boisclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461282
Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Frank Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 15:25 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 17:02 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 11:53 -0400, Travis Arnold wrote:
When updates resume, would anything show up in package
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with $arch.newkey to get to the new updates and
updates-testing trees. I haven't seen an update to the release trees
show up yet.
Hi Bruno,
I'm trying to take your advice
On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 10:20 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Going from reliable (trust the pid file) to the more cautious (trust
the
pid file, but check the pid has not been recycled (daemon dies without
tiying up the pid file, new unrelated process gets the same pid)) you
can do something like
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with $arch.newkey to get to the new updates and
updates-testing trees. I haven't seen an update to the release trees
show up yet.
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with $arch.newkey to get to the new updates and
updates-testing trees. I haven't seen an
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with $arch.newkey to get to the new updates and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 07.09.2008 04:39, Adil Drissi a écrit :
Hi,
Thank you for your answer. I want to use this in my personal
computer. Can you give me the name of the variable please? Say I will
set that variable to UTF-8 in /etc/profile, do you think that vim
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:05:17 Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with $arch.newkey to get to the
04:01:15 : Error checking package signatures:
Public key for yum-keys-1.1.15-1.fc8.noarch.rpm is not installed
Advice?
Thanks.
to avoid this you may use --nogpgcheck for yum, doubt that can be set
up in yumex
--
Regards,
Ivan Cat
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Ed Greshko wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with $arch.newkey to get to
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:05:17 Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:23:16 Ed Greshko wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with
Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:23:16 Ed Greshko wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:39:23 Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:05:17 Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Tony Molloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:23:16 Ed Greshko wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C.
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:46:04 Ed Greshko wrote:
Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:23:16 Ed Greshko wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Tony Molloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:23:16 Ed Greshko wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Stuart Sears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whenever I run
/sbin/service rpcbind restart
I get everything OK, but Selinux pops up a message indicating:
AVC denial
After the rpcbind restart, no progress regarding nfs being able to start.
Yes, I am running F9.
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:53:35 Ed Greshko wrote:
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Tony Molloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:23:16 Ed Greshko wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07
Tony Molloy wrote:
I disabled the gpgcheck in fedora-updates-repo ( which I wouldn't recommend on
any machine , this is a TEST box ) and it's installing now.
Perhaps in
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/9/i386.newkey/fedora-release-notes-9.0.1-1.noarch.rpm
there
The setroubleshoot browser is reporting the following issues on Fedora 9:
SELinux is preventing kerneloops (kerneloops_t) signal to Unknown
(kerneloops_t).
SELinux is preventing dhclient (dhcpc_t) read write to socket
(unconfined_t).
The first issue occurs on boot. The second issue occurs
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Tony Molloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 11:10:25 Andrea Mastellone wrote:
Tony Molloy wrote:
I disabled the gpgcheck in fedora-updates-repo ( which I wouldn't
recommend on any machine , this is a TEST box ) and it's installing now.
On Sunday 07 September 2008 11:10:25 Andrea Mastellone wrote:
Tony Molloy wrote:
I disabled the gpgcheck in fedora-updates-repo ( which I wouldn't
recommend on any machine , this is a TEST box ) and it's installing now.
Perhaps in
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Stuart Sears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...edited...]
An 'AVC denial' is just telling you that SELinux has prevented
something from happening on your system. We'd need the actual
denial message to see what it's complaining about - click on the
Sheriff's badge
Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All,
At booting, ntpdate fails to start, and also the following command fails:
# /sbin/service ntpdate start
ntpdate: Synchronizing with time server: [FAILED]
#
The log messages are:
Sep 7 12:50:50 localhost ntpdate[2908]: the NTP socket is
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Paul Smith wrote:
host=mypc type=AVC msg=audit(1220780572.503:49): avc: denied { read
} for pid=4150 comm=rpcbind name=services dev=dm-0 ino=11649032
scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:rpcbind_t:s0
tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:rpm_script_tmp_t:s0 tclass=file
host=mypc
Paul Smith wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Paul,
Does your server as client ?
Edward.
Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All,
At booting, ntpdate fails to start, and also the following command fails:
# /sbin/service ntpdate start
ntpdate: Synchronizing
Dear All,
At booting, ntpdate fails to start, and also the following command fails:
# /sbin/service ntpdate start
ntpdate: Synchronizing with time server: [FAILED]
#
The log messages are:
Sep 7 12:50:50 localhost ntpdate[2908]: the NTP socket is in use, exiting
Any ideas?
Paul Smith wrote:
[...]
Thanks a lot, Stuart. The command
restorecon -v /etc/services
solved the problem.
Can the problem that I reported be considered a bug of Selinux?
No. It is supposed to only allow rpcbind to access files that are
labelled in a specific way (I don't have a list to
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Paul,
Does your server as client ?
Edward.
Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All,
At booting, ntpdate fails to start, and also the following command fails:
# /sbin/service ntpdate start
ntpdate: Synchronizing with time server:
Hello Paul,
Does your server as client ?
Edward.
Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All,
At booting, ntpdate fails to start, and also the following command fails:
# /sbin/service ntpdate start
ntpdate: Synchronizing with time server: [FAILED]
#
The log messages are:
Sep 7 12:50:50
Paul Smith wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Stuart Sears [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...edited...]
An 'AVC denial' is just telling you that SELinux has prevented
something from happening on your system. We'd need the actual
denial message to see what it's complaining about - click on the
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Stuart Sears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At booting, ntpdate fails to start, and also the following command fails:
# /sbin/service ntpdate start
ntpdate: Synchronizing with time server: [FAILED]
#
The log messages are:
Sep 7 12:50:50
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Stuart Sears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Smith wrote:
[...]
Thanks a lot, Stuart. The command
restorecon -v /etc/services
solved the problem.
Can the problem that I reported be considered a bug of Selinux?
No. It is supposed to only allow rpcbind to
This is all new land for me, so bear with me if the answer is trivial.
I have patched kernel 2.6.23.1-42.fc8 (actually sata_mv.c) to support my sta
disk controller. It works correctly, I can attach my disks make directories and
store data on them and even retrieve the data. So from that
Paul Smith wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Stuart Sears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At booting, ntpdate fails to start, and also the following command fails:
# /sbin/service ntpdate start
ntpdate: Synchronizing with time server: [FAILED]
#
The log messages are:
Sep 7
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At booting, ntpdate fails to start, and also the following command
fails:
# /sbin/service ntpdate start
ntpdate: Synchronizing with time server: [FAILED]
#
The log messages are:
Sep 7 12:50:50
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At booting, ntpdate fails to start, and also the following command
fails:
# /sbin/service ntpdate start
ntpdate: Synchronizing with time server: [FAILED]
#
The log messages are:
Sep 7 12:50:50
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Jim wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Jim wrote:
If I get a .jpg picture in a email Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 won't open
pictures, Even after I tell it to Open Images.
But if I go to attachments at bottom of email and click on attachments
it will open
* Erik P. Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080907 15:10]:
This is all new land for me, so bear with me if the answer is trivial.
I have patched kernel 2.6.23.1-42.fc8 (actually sata_mv.c) to support my sta
disk controller. It works correctly, I can attach my disks make directories
and
store data
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 04:04:28PM +0200, Anders Karlsson wrote:
* Erik P. Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080907 15:10]:
This is all new land for me, so bear with me if the answer is trivial.
I have patched kernel 2.6.23.1-42.fc8 (actually sata_mv.c) to support my sta
disk controller
François Patte wrote:
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8
I don't understand what is meant here: this tag is for server use, not
for the text editor used to edit the html file.
If you have an HTML file that you don't know how it's encoded, then one way of
trying to
Erik P. Olsen wrote:
This is all new land for me, so bear with me if the answer is trivial.
I have patched kernel 2.6.23.1-42.fc8 (actually sata_mv.c) to support my sta
disk controller. It works correctly, I can attach my disks make directories and
store data on them and even retrieve the data.
Steve Repo wrote:
Typical Fedora cryptic answer.
Well, as far as I understand, when the updates are available, yum
update should fetch new fedora-release RPM with the new key. This
will automatically install the new key and allow newer updates to
flow.
So, technically, a yum update should
On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 04:42 -0500, Stephen Croll wrote:
The setroubleshoot browser is reporting the following issues on Fedora 9:
SELinux is preventing kerneloops (kerneloops_t) signal to Unknown
Massive snip
--
Steve Croll
Steve I would say pass this to the selinux list,
a lot og
Paul Smith wrote:
# /sbin/service ntpd status
ntpd (pid 2059) is running...
#
ntpdate tries to start at booting. So, should I disable it? Which one
of the two should I have running in order to have always a correct
time on my computer?
If you usually leave your computer running and reboot
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 12:05:09 +0530,
Steve Repo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, as far as I understand, when the updates are available, yum
update should fetch new fedora-release RPM with the new key. This
will automatically install the new key and allow newer updates to
flow.
So,
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 12:29:01 +0100,
Tony Molloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 11:10:25 Andrea Mastellone wrote:
Tony Molloy wrote:
I disabled the gpgcheck in fedora-updates-repo ( which I wouldn't
recommend on any machine , this is a TEST box ) and it's
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 17:09:53 +0530,
Steve Repo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you confirm if the updates you downloaded (~1.2GB) are newer since
Aug 12 (since the incident) or are they just the same updates released
after F9 release but signed with a new key?
I'm just worried that I'll
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Björn Persson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# /sbin/service ntpd status
ntpd (pid 2059) is running...
#
ntpdate tries to start at booting. So, should I disable it? Which one
of the two should I have running in order to have always a correct
time on my computer?
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I remove one of them from trying to start at booting?
Nevermind, as I have found a solution myself meanwhile.
Paul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 02:49:18 -0400,
David C. Chipman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with $arch.newkey to get to the new updates and
updates-testing trees. I haven't seen an update to the release
Paul Smith wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At booting, ntpdate fails to start, and also the following command
fails:
# /sbin/service ntpdate start
ntpdate: Synchronizing with time server: [FAILED]
#
The log messages are:
Sep 7
Hi
I have some permanent CIFS mounts, some from a Windows server and some from a
Buffalo Terastation NAS.
If changes are made to either server, even just access rights, without
umounting and re-mounting, both my Fedora servers kernel panic and freeze -
most awkward if I'm off-site. Usually
Hello guys,
i am using subpixel smoothing with medium hinting for fonts in Gnome on
Fedora 9. Configured using gnome settings. All my GTK applications use
subpixel smoothed fonts.
I want to have such nice subpixel smoothed fonts under Wine = Xwindow
applications. Is there way to configure it?
Paul Smith wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Björn Persson
If you usually leave your computer running and reboot it only when
there's an update to Linux or GlibC, then you should use NTPD. It polls
its servers periodically and keeps your clock synchronized. If you only
turn the
for some months I've had trouble with automatic time updates
BOTH under XP Prof (I dual boot) and Fedora 9
Under F9 I get an error if I force an update!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 18:20:02 +0200
Adil Drissi wrote:
Thank you for your answer. I want to use this in my personal computer.
Can you give me the name of the variable please? Say I will set that
variable to UTF-8 in /etc/profile, do you think that vim will always save
my files in utf-8 format?
There's a whole set of environment
Så du hänger på den här listan. :-)
/Jonas Karlsson
Adil Drissi wrote:
Thank you for your answer. I want to use this in my personal computer.
Can you give me the name of the variable please? Say I will set that
variable to UTF-8 in /etc/profile, do you think that vim will always
save
söndagen den 7 september 2008 skrev Roger Heflin:
On a typical setup ntpdate runs first (and exits) and syncs the clock close
but not exactly on. If this is not done and the time is off by more than
a certain amount then ntpd *WON'T* be able to sync things, and will exit
with an error.
On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 08:36 +0100, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with $arch.newkey to get to the new updates and
updates-testing trees. I haven't
Aaron Konstam wrote:
There was a mistake in my post the miwssing dependency was:
Error: Missing Dependency: xine-lib(plugin-abi) = 1.21 is needed by
package xine-lib-extras-nonfree-1.1.12-1.lvn9.i386 (installed)
It is still missing and xine-lib-extras-nonfree-1.1.12 cannot be
installed because
David Hláčik david at hlacik.eu writes:
Hello guys,i am using subpixel smoothing with medium hinting for fonts in
Gnome on Fedora 9. Configured using gnome settings.
You need freetype-freeworld from Livna to actually get subpixel antialiasing,
it's disabled for patent reasons in the Fedora
Ed Greshko wrote:
I think you have no concept of public/private encryption or signing.
My concept is that if I can fool you into accepting a false public
key, I can sign packages with the matching false private key, and when
you install the first such package it may (probably will) include
I guess I need a little direction here.
I have created an NTFS partition under F9, and noticed
that this partition upon login automatically FUSE mounts
to my desktop. Ok, well, I did try to add this partition to the
fstab. this partition to my /wApp1 directory but found that
there were
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
I guess I need a little direction here.
I have created an NTFS partition under F9, and noticed
that this partition upon login automatically FUSE mounts
to my desktop. Ok, well, I did try to add this partition to the
fstab. this partition to my /wApp1 directory but
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
I guess I need a little direction here.
I have created an NTFS partition under F9, and noticed
that this partition upon login automatically FUSE mounts
to my desktop. Ok, well, I did try to add this partition to the
fstab. this partition
Les Mikesell wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
I think you have no concept of public/private encryption or signing.
My concept is that if I can fool you into accepting a false public
key, I can sign packages with the matching false private key, and when
you install the first such package it may
Salut,
Comme évoqué à la réunion d'hier soir dimanche, Fedora-fr a besoin de
flyer pour communiquer à la fête de l'humanité.
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraEvents/Huma2008_Paris). Je me suis
proposé pour les réaliser. Le souci est, je l'ai appris après, qu'il les
faut pour dans deux jours
On Monday 08 September 2008 03:22:55 Dave Feustel wrote:
Is there a fedora mailing list dedicated to developing/discussing
applications (eg mailers, text editors, word processors, etc) that use
and display unicode?
Try fedora-i18n-list. This list is for anything relating to Fedora and
Ed Greshko wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
It would be very nice if someone would fully define what they mean by
the very vague term fake key.
In this context it would one that a user would install that was not the
one officially created for the packages in the fedora repository.
And along with
Les Mikesell wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
It would be very nice if someone would fully define what they mean by
the very vague term fake key.
In this context it would one that a user would install that was not
the one officially created for the packages in the fedora
Ed Greshko wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
It would be very nice if someone would fully define what they mean by
the very vague term fake key.
I think most of us would mean a key created by someone not part of the
Fedora project, and which is intended to convince users that it is, in
fact, a key
Bill Davidsen wrote:
If the public/private key methods employed today are as easy to
penetrate and subvert as some seem to be claiming then one has to
question why it hasn't already been done.
It has already been proved to be possible, so discussion of how easy
it is or way is
James Pifer wrote:
I could use a little help with ps and grep. When running a command like:
# ps -ewf | grep sendmail
root 2730 1 0 Jul14 ?00:00:01 sendmail: accepting connections
smmsp 2739 1 0 Jul14 ?00:00:00 sendmail: Queue [EMAIL
PROTECTED]:00:00 for
Ed Greshko wrote:
It's not easy to fool everyone. The question is whether there is a
way to start from scratch so you can't fool anyone.
And, it is even less easy to fool the people whose networks have
something worth stealing
And yet it happens regularly.
Why go through the
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 12:05:09 +0530,
Steve Repo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, as far as I understand, when the updates are available, yum
update should fetch new fedora-release RPM with the new key. This
will automatically install the new key and allow newer
Les Mikesell wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
It's not easy to fool everyone. The question is whether there is a
way to start from scratch so you can't fool anyone.
And, it is even less easy to fool the people whose networks have
something worth stealing
And yet it happens regularly.
By a
On Monday 08 September 2008 10:52:17 Dave Feustel wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 09:50:59AM +1000, Asgeir Frimannsson wrote:
On Monday 08 September 2008 03:22:55 Dave Feustel wrote:
Is there a fedora mailing list dedicated to developing/discussing
applications (eg mailers, text editors,
On 07Sep2008 02:29, Patrick O'Callaghan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 10:20 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| Going from reliable (trust the pid file) to the more cautious (trust
| the
| pid file, but check the pid has not been recycled (daemon dies without
| tiying up the pid
Ed Greshko wrote:
What's the point of having the key at all if you implicitly trust the
delivery mechanism of the RPM packages?
Good approach, answer a question with another question.
If you can't say why you need the key in the first place, there isn't
much hope of seeing why you need a
Les Mikesell wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
What's the point of having the key at all if you implicitly trust the
delivery mechanism of the RPM packages?
Good approach, answer a question with another question.
If you can't say why you need the key in the first place, there isn't
much hope of
Ed Greshko wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
If the public/private key methods employed today are as easy to
penetrate and subvert as some seem to be claiming then one has to
question why it hasn't already been done.
It has already been proved to be possible, so discussion of how easy
it is or
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
If the public/private key methods employed today are as easy to
penetrate and subvert as some seem to be claiming then one has to
question why it hasn't already been done.
It has already been proved to be possible, so discussion
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
