2010/1/1 Chris Smart :
> Has anyone looked into openSUSE's brilliant integration of Firefox
> into KDE4? Is this something that interests the Fedora community?
>
I have stumbled across a Firefox add-on theme called "Oxygen KDE"
which I think does a pretty amazing job of ma
2010/1/8 Chris Smart :
> I have stumbled across a Firefox add-on theme called "Oxygen KDE"
> which I think does a pretty amazing job of making Firefox look like a
> KDE app.
Oh, and this is a great add-on too, plasma notification:
"https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/f
Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
>
>
>>> I have seen that in the past. I'm not sure what improved things for
>>> me; maybe the two block options you mentioned. You may also want to
>>> try cleaning up your database files, as described here:
>>>
>>
oes chrome do
- it does not suffer this issue at all - perhaps firefox can try and
follow chrome.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Wayne Feick wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 15:45 -0700, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Wayne Feick wrote:
>> > I've been having a lot of problems with firefox periodically becoming
>> > unusable while it
I found that the Vacuum was much more effective if I did Tools ->
Clear Recent History first.
Don Quixote
--
Don Quixote de la Mancha
quix...@dulcineatech.com
http://www.dulcineatech.com
Dulcinea Technologies Corporation: Software of Elegance and Beauty.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-l
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 15:45 -0700, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Wayne Feick wrote:
> > I've been having a lot of problems with firefox periodically becoming
> > unusable while it pounds away at my disk. It comes back after a while, but
> > t
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Wayne Feick wrote:
> I've been having a lot of problems with firefox periodically becoming
> unusable while it pounds away at my disk. It comes back after a while, but
> then does it again. I tried web searching and found some recommendations
>
I've been having a lot of problems with firefox periodically becoming
unusable while it pounds away at my disk. It comes back after a while,
but then does it again. I tried web searching and found some
recommendations about turning off "Block reported attack sites" and
&quo
2010/1/2 Rex Dieter :
>
> We (fedora-kde sig) would be more interested in this if there were more
> effort to push such integration to mozilla upstream. As far as I'm aware,
> there is very little to date. (ie, I personally wouldn't be too interested
> in trying to maintain something like this th
On 01/03/2010 04:18 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:40:32 -0500
> Julian C. Dunn wrote:
>
Could there be some bug with the radeon driver that is causing this?
>>>
>>> Do you have desktop effects enabled?
>>
>> Nope, I don't.
>
> There are certainly radeon bugs out there.
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:40:32 -0500
Julian C. Dunn wrote:
> >> Could there be some bug with the radeon driver that is causing this?
> >
> > Do you have desktop effects enabled?
>
> Nope, I don't.
There are certainly radeon bugs out there. For instance:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
On 01/03/2010 12:41 AM, Hiisi wrote:
> 2010/1/3 Julian C. Dunn :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a F12 box that periodically locks up solid when visiting certain
>> Flash-based sites in Firefox. There are usually no odd messages found in
>> /var/log/messages to indicate wh
2010/1/3 Julian C. Dunn :
> Hi,
>
> I have a F12 box that periodically locks up solid when visiting certain
> Flash-based sites in Firefox. There are usually no odd messages found in
> /var/log/messages to indicate what went wrong, except a couple of days
> ago, after a c
2010/1/3 Marko Vojinovic :
>
> In principle, this is a good idea. In practice, I'm not sure how well it can
> be done and is it worth the effort. But I welcome the initiative, of course.
>
It has already been done and it was certainly worth the effort.
Download the openSUSE KDE Live CD and see for
Hi,
I have a F12 box that periodically locks up solid when visiting certain
Flash-based sites in Firefox. There are usually no odd messages found in
/var/log/messages to indicate what went wrong, except a couple of days
ago, after a crash, I found this:
Dec 29 13:01:50 jupiter kernel
On Saturday 02 January 2010 16:58:08 Chris Smart wrote:
> 2010/1/2 Tim :
> > Is there a description of what that actually means? A page of statuses
> > gives no clue, but the name sounds like someone's trying to copy the
> > Microsoft lunacy of integrating MSIE into th
On 01/02/2010 12:33 PM, Mike Cloaked wrote:
> It time I agree that it does look as though Chrome may well win - if the
> Firefox
> developers don't pay attention to the competition - and gecko is not the way
> forward - webkit is!
>
>
Agreed - and being native clean
Mail Lists sapience.com> writes:
>
> Actually chrome is way faster, more secure and takes way way less
> memory - I suspect firefox usage will slowly tail off much like netscape
> did in the past - as chrome takes over .. it is so so much better ...
> even in its beta for
2010/1/2 Tim :
>
> Is there a description of what that actually means? A page of statuses
> gives no clue, but the name sounds like someone's trying to copy the
> Microsoft lunacy of integrating MSIE into the desktop.
>
Firefox is GTK based which means it integrates into
On Fri, 2010-01-01 at 20:26 +1100, Chris Smart wrote:
> Has anyone looked into openSUSE's brilliant integration of Firefox
> into KDE4? Is this something that interests the Fedora community?
>
> Status:
> "http://en.opensuse.org/KDE/FirefoxIntegration";
>
2010/1/2 Chris Smart :
>
> I don't quite trust Google enough, but I do think that the browser
> holds a lot of promise. Google also has the brand name to take massive
> market share, so it will be interesting.
Just downloaded and installed 4.0 beta of the Iron port which looks
like it uses GTK to
2010/1/2 Mail Lists :
>
> Actually chrome is way faster, more secure and takes way way less
> memory - I suspect firefox usage will slowly tail off much like netscape
> did in the past - as chrome takes over .. it is so so much better ...
> even in its beta form.
Maybe so, but
On 01/01/2010 08:23 PM, Chris Smart wrote:
> A decent, well integrated Qt browser is still a major missing
> component of KDE and doesn't appear to be coming any time soon. Most
> users like Firefox and this seems a good compromise.
>
Actually chrome is way faster, more sec
ents, it's very nice.
A decent, well integrated Qt browser is still a major missing
component of KDE and doesn't appear to be coming any time soon. Most
users like Firefox and this seems a good compromise.
-c
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https:/
Chris Smart wrote:
> Has anyone looked into openSUSE's brilliant integration of Firefox
> into KDE4? Is this something that interests the Fedora community?
>
> Status:
> "http://en.opensuse.org/KDE/FirefoxIntegration";
>
> Code:
> "http://gitorious.
On 01/01/2010 09:26 AM, Chris Smart wrote:
> Has anyone looked into openSUSE's brilliant integration of Firefox
> into KDE4? Is this something that interests the Fedora community?
>
> Status:
> "http://en.opensuse.org/KDE/FirefoxIntegration";
>
> Code:
Has anyone looked into openSUSE's brilliant integration of Firefox
into KDE4? Is this something that interests the Fedora community?
Status:
"http://en.opensuse.org/KDE/FirefoxIntegration";
Code:
"http://gitorious.org/firefox-kde-opensuse";
-c
--
fedora-list
On 12/27/2009 11:46 AM, Jim wrote:
FC11 and FC12 / KDE
latest version of Firefox keeps jumping back to a previous website, just
click on anything in a website, and it kicks you back to a previous
website.
This happens on two different X86_64 boxes using Fedora 11, 12 .
you might try playing
On 27/12/09 14:46, Jim wrote:
FC11 and FC12 / KDE
latest version of Firefox keeps jumping back to a previous website,
just click on anything in a website, and it kicks you back to a
previous website.
This happens on two different X86_64 boxes using Fedora 11, 12 .
Yes and it happens
FC11 and FC12 / KDE
latest version of Firefox keeps jumping back to a previous website, just
click on anything in a website, and it kicks you back to a previous website.
This happens on two different X86_64 boxes using Fedora 11, 12 .
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
On 26/12/09 21:51, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Bob Goodwin writes:
This is an updated F-12 computer, in fact I have two and both have
the same problem printing from flash in Firefox. When I ask it to
print the menu comes up allowing me to select the printer and that
accepts my
Bob Goodwin writes:
This is an updated F-12 computer, in fact I have two and both have
the same problem printing from flash in Firefox. When I ask it to
print the menu comes up allowing me to select the printer and that
accepts my selection, but no matter which of three printers
Fedora/3.5.6-1.fc12 Firefox/3.5.6
about:plugins shows:
Shockwave Flash
File name: nswrapper_64_64.libflashplayer.so
Shockwave Flash 10.0 r42
This is an updated F-12 computer, in fact I have two and both have
the same problem printing from flash in
being, you can revert to the older version like so:
sudo rpm -e --nodeps firefox xulrunner && sudo yum install -y
--disablerepo=updates firefox xulrunner
...note you'll be running Firefox w/o the latest updates, but some
people need Firebug (like me).
--
fedora-list mailing list
fe
Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 22Dec2009 08:24, Ed Greshko wrote:
> | Frank Cox wrote:
> | > On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 16:31 -0600, Brian Wood wrote:
> | >> I downloaded/built/installed a new version of sqlite, but that hasn't
> | >> helped.
> | >
> | >
On 22Dec2009 08:24, Ed Greshko wrote:
| Frank Cox wrote:
| > On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 16:31 -0600, Brian Wood wrote:
| >> I downloaded/built/installed a new version of sqlite, but that hasn't
| >> helped.
| >
| > This is likely your problem. Firefox probably expects to
k, so I found a little more time to focus on this... It turns out to
be just these two packages:
firefox
xulrunner
...that cause the problem (well, for me, anyways). I've reverted the
following packages to the original repo versions:
# rpm -e --nodeps firefox xulrunner
# yum install --disab
; > appears to have only pointed me at 'Bug 520339' (
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520339 ).
> Have you tried starting firefox from the command line with -safe-mode
selected?
Yes, I have, same result.
For the time being, I've basically reverted -all-
Mike Park wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I must be one of the very few people this has happened to, as Google
> appears to have only pointed me at 'Bug 520339' (
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520339 ).
>
> Has anyone else experienced behavior like this with F
Hi there,
I must be one of the very few people this has happened to, as Google
appears to have only pointed me at 'Bug 520339' (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520339 ).
Has anyone else experienced behavior like this with Firefox? It seems
my SQLite is up to date, so I&#
Frank Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 16:31 -0600, Brian Wood wrote:
>
>> I downloaded/built/installed a new version of sqlite, but that hasn't
>> helped.
>>
>
> This is likely your problem. Firefox probably expects to find sqlite
> installed fro
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 16:31 -0600, Brian Wood wrote:
> I downloaded/built/installed a new version of sqlite, but that hasn't
> helped.
This is likely your problem. Firefox probably expects to find sqlite
installed from a Fedora rpm and not a homebuilt one.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Me
Yesterday I allowed the system to install some security updates.
Since then when I've tried to start Firefox, I get "The application has
been updated, but your version of SQLite is too old and the
application cannot run." I downloaded/built/installed a new version
of sqlite,
A few weeks ago something happened with firefox and I can no longer
open a URL into a new window using the right mouse button, "ctl n", or
using the drop down menu under "file" to open a new window ; I can
only open a URL into a new tab or open a window into a new tab.
Should
On 12/19/2009 06:56 AM, Hiisi wrote:
> 2009/12/16 Steven Stern :
>> I'm reposting this as the original report had no responses Firefox is
>> completely unstable. The stack trace indicates that the problem is probably
>> in the flash plugin, but it's crashing
I get an error dialog:
SQLite Version Error
The application has been updated, but your version of SQLite is too
old and the application cannot run.
this happened immediately after installing F12 from the x86_64 DVD.
that was with sqlite version 3.6.17 and firefox 3.4.???
After doing a yum
2009/12/16 Steven Stern :
> I'm reposting this as the original report had no responses Firefox is
> completely unstable. The stack trace indicates that the problem is probably
> in the flash plugin, but it's crashing on pages that, as far as I can tell,
> have no fl
On 12/16/2009 12:38 PM, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 09-12-16 10:04:02, Steven Stern wrote:
I'm reposting this as the original report had no responses
Firefox is completely unstable. The stack trace indicates that the
problem is probably in the flash plugin, but it's crashing on page
On 09-12-16 10:04:02, Steven Stern wrote:
> I'm reposting this as the original report had no responses
> Firefox is completely unstable. The stack trace indicates that the
> problem is probably in the flash plugin, but it's crashing on pages
> that, as far as I c
I'm reposting this as the original report had no responses Firefox
is completely unstable. The stack trace indicates that the problem is
probably in the flash plugin, but it's crashing on pages that, as far as
I can tell, have no flash content.
Abrt says it can't report
Abrt says it can't report a firefox crash because I need to
"debuginfo-install firefox". I did that, downloading and installing
127MB of stuff. Now, there's been another Firefox crash and abrt is
telling me the same thing. What to do?
trying debuginfo-install again show
Seen discussions, where people claiming Firefox crashing and stucking.
In my case Firefox became extreamly slow and stucked every now and
then. Same time saw in messages log, that npviewer with flash caused
some problems.
I uninstalled nspluginwrapper package and now seems Firefox work more
Hi!
> Get rid of any plugins and addons, then see if it still
> happens.
Hmm, I wonder why I hadn't tried this before, it seems to help. Perhaps because
I have a dual-boot system and the same add-ons on Win XP do not cause any side
effects. Anyway, thanks for the tip, I'll continue without add-
On 09-12-10 13:53:32, Daniel Qarras wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Briefly, when Firefox is not running F12 works like a charm. After
> starting Firefox every other minute Firefox hangs completely, disk
> drive led burns constantly and the system feel jammed, I can do
> barely anything. Thi
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 10:53 -0800, Daniel Qarras wrote:
> The questions are: is anyone else seeing even remotely similar? Is
> there any known reasons or fixes for this? Should I file a BZ about
> this? If so, what information should I provide?
Get rid of any plugins and addons, then see if it st
Hi!
Briefly, when Firefox is not running F12 works like a charm. After starting
Firefox every other minute Firefox hangs completely, disk drive led burns
constantly and the system feel jammed, I can do barely anything. This usually
lasts 10 to 20 seconds and then things are normal again for
> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:08:48 -0500 (EST)
> From: "Robert P. J. Day"
> Subject: Re: anyone noticed this odd firefox glitch?
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement,
> and advice for using
> Fedora."
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Typ
Hi;
I use:
firefox-3.5.5-1.fc12.x86_64
kernel 2.6.31.6-145.fc12.x86_64
When I go to youtube and play a video it works fine.
However if I walk away for a while and then tryto watch something I get no
sound.
I can use dolphin to play a .flv file just fine.
If I quit firefox and start it again
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Hiisi wrote:
> 2009/12/2 Peter Langfelder :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> just curious if anybody else noticed this: after today's updates, with
>> a fully updated 32 bit F11 under Gnome desktop, menus in firefox don't
>> work. Cl
2009/12/2 Peter Langfelder :
> Hi all,
>
> just curious if anybody else noticed this: after today's updates, with
> a fully updated 32 bit F11 under Gnome desktop, menus in firefox don't
> work. Clicking on File, Edit, etc. produces nothing. Further, history
> seems
Hi all,
just curious if anybody else noticed this: after today's updates, with
a fully updated 32 bit F11 under Gnome desktop, menus in firefox don't
work. Clicking on File, Edit, etc. produces nothing. Further, history
seems to be inoperative - hints in the address bar don't
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 22:07 -0800, Alejandro Rodriguez Luna wrote:
> Hi all!!
>
> I've installed flash plugin from Adobe
> ( flash-plugin-10.0.32.18-release.i386), everything work ok, i mean,
> in firefox without the plugin activated, when I surf in a page with
> flash, f
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 22:07 -0800, Alejandro Rodriguez Luna wrote:
> Hi all!!
>
> I've installed flash plugin from Adobe
> ( flash-plugin-10.0.32.18-release.i386), everything work ok, i mean,
> in firefox without the plugin activated, when I surf in a page with
> flash, f
Hi all!!
I've installed flash plugin from Adobe ( flash-plugin-10.0.32.18-release.i386),
everything work ok, i mean, in firefox without the plugin activated, when I
surf in a page with flash, firefox become extremely slow, and sometime it froze.
Any
On 09-11-30 04:03:12, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
...
> i've seen some trivial but fairly new oddities as well. as i
> mentioned before, the scroll bar doesn't seem to act consistently.
> once upon a time, if i clicked way down the scrollbar to page down,
> firefox would,
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i've seen some trivial but fairly new oddities as well. as i
> > mentioned before, the scroll bar doesn't seem to act consistently.
> > once upon a time, if i clicked way down the scrollbar
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i've seen some trivial but fairly new oddities as well. as i
> mentioned before, the scroll bar doesn't seem to act consistently.
> once upon a time, if i clicked way down the scrollbar to page down,
> firefox would, well, page down. once. now
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, Tom Horsley wrote:
> After some recent updates (which included a new ati driver) firefox
> exhibits this weird behavior on my system. When I start firefox, the
> first time it gets the focus, it flickers once like it just decided
> it needed to redraw the whol
After some recent updates (which included a new ati driver)
firefox exhibits this weird behavior on my system. When I
start firefox, the first time it gets the focus, it flickers
once like it just decided it needed to redraw the whole
screen. (I have focus set to follow the mouse).
After it does
Disabling all add-ons makes no difference - it still crashes.
Paolo
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Steve Searle wrote:
> Around 09:15pm on Sunday, November 29, 2009 (UK time), Paolo Galtieri
> scrawled:
>
> > The 64 bit version of Firefox from F12 is very unstable. I impor
Am Sonntag, den 29.11.2009, 14:15 -0700 schrieb Paolo Galtieri:
> The 64 bit version of Firefox from F12 is very unstable. I imported
> my bookmarks from a .html file, and the bookmark list comes up fine,
> but when I try to save a bookmark by clicking on "Bookmark This Page"
Am Sonntag, den 29.11.2009, 14:15 -0700 schrieb Paolo Galtieri:
> The 64 bit version of Firefox from F12 is very unstable. I imported
> my bookmarks from a .html file, and the bookmark list comes up fine,
> but when I try to save a bookmark by clicking on "Bookmark This Page"
Around 09:15pm on Sunday, November 29, 2009 (UK time), Paolo Galtieri scrawled:
> The 64 bit version of Firefox from F12 is very unstable. I imported my
Your installation maybe. I havve it running on two machines with no
problems.
Try disabling all addons and see if that makes a differe
The 64 bit version of Firefox from F12 is very unstable. I imported my
bookmarks from a .html file, and the bookmark list comes up fine, but when I
try to save a bookmark by clicking on "Bookmark This Page" from the bookmark
menu and then clicking on "Show all the boomarks fol
I start firefox (64bit) with one tab pointed at start.fedoraproject.com
I try to save a bookmark to this page by bringing up the bookmark this page
dialog from the menubar. I click on the "show all bookmarks folders" arrow
and I get a dialog box showing all my bookmarks and bookmark f
I tried installing the 32bit version along with the assorted 32bit
libraries, but I couldn't get the 32bit version to run due to some cryptic
message which I didn't write down :-( What I find strange is that if I
install the 32bit version of flash the 64 bit bit firefox does not see
Hi Paulo,
Have you had a look at the Firefox bug list? I have recently noticed similar
behaviour with other Flash apps in FF3.5 on a 32bit Fedora 11 install.
Though I tend to mess around with my box more than I should, I assumed it
was me and haven't seriously looked into this. Thoug
ng whether Andrea is using 64bit or
> 32bit Firefox.
32 bit for me.
>
> Versions:
> firefox-3.5.5-1.fc11.x86_64
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091105
> Fedora/3.5.5-1.fc11 Firefox/3.5.5
>
> Think I'll file a bug once I get time..
/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091105
Fedora/3.5.5-1.fc11 Firefox/3.5.5
I've got the same exact version, but as soon as I press pause, nothing
works anymore...
Maybe you have an extension loaded that's causing a conflict.
Having now tried t
rks fine for me.
>>>
>>> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091105
>>> Fedora/3.5.5-1.fc11 Firefox/3.5.5
>>
>> I've got the same exact version, but as soon as I press pause, nothing
>> works anymore...
>
> Maybe you have an
2009/11/27 Robert P. J. Day :
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
>> > I'm having strange behaviour with 64bit firefox and the 64bit beta
>> > version of Adobe flash. So I want to try the 32b
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> > I'm having strange behaviour with 64bit firefox and the 64bit beta
> > version of Adobe flash. So I want to try the 32bit version of
> > firefox with the 32bit flas
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> I'm having strange behaviour with 64bit firefox and the 64bit beta version
> of Adobe flash. So I want to try the 32bit version of firefox with the
> 32bit flash from Adobe, but there in 32 bit version of firefox available
On 11/26/2009 12:05 PM, Andrea wrote:
On 26/11/09 16:53, brian wrote:
On 11/26/2009 10:37 AM, Andrea wrote:
If I pause the video there is no way of starting again.
Works fine for me.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091105
Fedora/3.5.5-1.fc11 Firefox/3.5.5
I&#x
On 26/11/09 16:53, brian wrote:
> On 11/26/2009 10:37 AM, Andrea wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> recently Firefox has become capable of playing video directly without
>> plugins.
>> It's the big HTML5 + saga.
>>
>> I'm running Fedora 11 super up to dat
On 11/26/2009 10:37 AM, Andrea wrote:
Hi,
recently Firefox has become capable of playing video directly without plugins.
It's the big HTML5 + saga.
I'm running Fedora 11 super up to date and I have to say that this things works
a bit but not very well.
Take for instance the ho
2009/11/26 Andrea :
> Hi,
>
> recently Firefox has become capable of playing video directly without plugins.
> It's the big HTML5 + saga.
>
> I'm running Fedora 11 super up to date and I have to say that this things
> works a bit but not very well.
>
> Take
Hi,
recently Firefox has become capable of playing video directly without plugins.
It's the big HTML5 + saga.
I'm running Fedora 11 super up to date and I have to say that this things works
a bit but not very well.
Take for instance the home page of firefox and click bottom
I'm having strange behaviour with 64bit firefox and the 64bit beta version
of Adobe flash. So I want to try the 32bit version of firefox with the
32bit flash from Adobe, but there in 32 bit version of firefox available
through the 64bit repositories. If I try the 32bit version of firefox
Anyone else seeing this in /var/log/messages, F12?
Nov 26 00:01:17 oh1mrr kernel: npviewer.bin[3014] general protection ip:74004c
sp:bf99d010 error:0 in libflashplayer.so[3d+99]
Nov 26 00:02:21 oh1mrr kernel: npviewer.bin[3057]: segfault at 13 ip 00be3fb7
sp bff3ace4 error 4 in libflashp
2009/11/25 Andreas M. Kirchwitz :
> I still have to find out why the all-new-and-shiny "nouveau" graphics
> driver is so much slower than the old "nv" driver. And why does
> gnome-appearance-properties ignore anything I set as background?
> But that's a different story. ;-)
>
Your background pro
It's a little bit strange to answer own articles ...
> Just freshly installed my old Fedora 10 system with Fedora 12 (32 bit),
> and I was suprised to see that Firefox 3.5.5 (directly from mozilla.org)
> crashes on any site with flash (Flash plugin 10.0.32.18 from adobe
I installed F12,
it works well.
I have no such crash any more.
(F10, F11 do crash with Firefox+flash)
PS:
in 'about:plugins' of Firefox,
about Shockwave flash,
it shows:
'File name: nswrapper_32_32.libflashplayer.so'.
Firefox: firefox-3.5.5-1.fc12.i686,
Flash : fla
table info available.
…
80 0x7f662b0eda40 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#81 0x in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
Current language: auto
The current source language is "auto; currently c".
The only clue is that Firefox here dies with SIGILL:
Program te
Around 01:22am on Monday, November 23, 2009 (UK time), Robert G. (Doc) Savage
scrawled:
> That's where I found the fedoraforum link in my post. What does
> about:plugins show in your system?
See www.stevesearle.com/s.png
Steve
--
(o< www.stevesearle.com
//\ Powered by Fedora
V_/_
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 10:58 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Monday 23 November 2009 04:46:40 Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 04:21 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > > firefox-3.5.5-1.fc12.x86_64
> > > libflashplayer-10.0.32.18.linux-x86
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 07:01 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> A contributing factor may be privoxy, which I use. By itself, privoxy
> is
> benign, of course, and has no effect,aside from cleaning up all the
> clutter.
> One possibility, that occured to me, is the loaded flash code quietly
> calli
Marko Vojinovic writes:
> firefox-3.5.5-1.fc12.x86_64
> libflashplayer-10.0.32.18.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz
Try this one:
http://www.verisign.com/domain-name-services/find-registrar/index.html
The flash on this page kills my Firefox, with the same plugin version that
you're runni
On Monday 23 November 2009 04:46:40 Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 04:21 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > firefox-3.5.5-1.fc12.x86_64
> > libflashplayer-10.0.32.18.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz
>
> Does flashplayer appear in your Firefox about:plugin? In min
1 - 100 of 1663 matches
Mail list logo
