On Sun July 8 2007 00:40:55 Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
Therefore, I'm announcing the official EOF of Kadischi. It is sad, but
it is _not_ the end of creation of custom spins at the Fedora Project
Kadischi, flew to close to the bright lights which is the fedoraproject a
no-no if your not [EMAIL
On Sunday 08 July 2007 06:40:50 dexter wrote:
Revisor, was not developed anywhere near this list and hence stands on its
own feet, a lesson perhaps.
Revisor, which is a wrapper for livecd-tools which /was/ developed and
discussed on this list for Fedora, after proving a viable concept in OLPC
Douglas McClendon wrote:
Douglas McClendon wrote:
Theoretical Workaround #1-5
-
Just curious; I like what I'm reading, although I do not follow some
parts of the theoretical workarounds, but: Is there any particular use
case for all of this? I'm asking, because the
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sunday 08 July 2007 06:40:50 dexter wrote:
Revisor, was not developed anywhere near this list and hence stands on its
own feet, a lesson perhaps.
Revisor, which is a wrapper for livecd-tools which /was/ developed and
discussed on this list for Fedora, after proving a
On Sun July 8 2007 12:23:07 Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
However I feel, this
is another stupid RH/fedora troll.
Stupidity -DONT-FEED-THE-TROLLS-
...dex
--
Fedora-livecd-list mailing list
Fedora-livecd-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
On 7/8/07, dexter wrote:
Community lead projects should not exist for the sole purpose of getting
fedoraproject blessing, which is what happend here fedora picks livecd-tools
kadischi dies a slow deaf.
But you are conscious that a real community lead project (as you
said) should have:
* have
dexter wrote:
On Sun July 8 2007 11:54:44 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
What exactly are you trying to imply?
Rahul
Community lead projects should not exist for the sole purpose of getting
fedoraproject blessing, which is what happend here fedora picks livecd-tools
kadischi dies a slow deaf.
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Douglas McClendon wrote:
Douglas McClendon wrote:
Theoretical Workaround #1-5
-
Just curious; I like what I'm reading, although I do not follow some
parts of the theoretical workarounds, but: Is there any particular use
case for all of
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Douglas McClendon wrote:
Douglas McClendon wrote:
Theoretical Workaround #1-5
-
Just curious; I like what I'm reading, although I do not follow some
parts of the theoretical workarounds, but: Is there any particular use
case for all of
Douglas McClendon wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Douglas McClendon wrote:
Douglas McClendon wrote:
Theoretical Workaround #1-5
-
Just curious; I like what I'm reading, although I do not follow some
parts of the theoretical workarounds, but: Is there any
Douglas McClendon wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Just curious; I like what I'm reading, although I do not follow some
parts of the theoretical workarounds, but: Is there any particular use
case for all of this? I'm asking, because the only thing I can think
of, it's all this work being done
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Douglas McClendon wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
The essence of why liveCDs are cool(==useful?) in the
first place, is because they allow users to try out the complete system,
without the traditionally complex and problematic process of installing
and
Douglas McClendon wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
In a similar vein, I would say that, perhaps this feature, which I'm
just working on out of pure spite for unnecessary reboots will spark
someone else's imagination, and use-cases will become more evident in
the future. Don't even get me
Continuing this thought- if MarkMC's dm-snapshot-merging patch was in the
kernel, there could be a button in the live session, such that at any
point
_long after_ the installation, the user could _opt_ to 'fold in' their
live-session modification. (i.e. hitting the button triggers a
Tim Wood wrote:
Continuing this thought- if MarkMC's dm-snapshot-merging patch was in the
kernel, there could be a button in the live session, such that at any
point
_long after_ the installation, the user could _opt_ to 'fold in' their
live-session modification. (i.e. hitting the button
Tim Wood wrote:
Before shooting from the hip anymore, I'll dig into my RHCT/CLP stuff and
see what I dig out. Homework... :-(
So have you been trolling me? Was the reference to Suse a pointer to the fact
that they have already done the rebootless install thing? (I'm too lazy to
download
16 matches
Mail list logo
