On 19/06/2025 22.46, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/19/2025 7:07 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 19/06/2025 18.27, Rob Hallam wrote:
It is published. You can compile and distribute it to your heart's
content- that's one of the great things about Free software.
I'm on Windows. There's no compiler.
The
On 19/06/2025 21.36, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/19/2025 6:11 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 19/06/2025 18.09, Rob Hallam wrote:
The internet runs on Linux. Phones run on Linux. Embedded devices run Linux.
Come on, Rob. The Internet doesn't run on Linux any more than companies run on
Oracle.
And
On 6/19/2025 7:07 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 19/06/2025 18.27, Rob Hallam wrote:
It is published. You can compile and distribute it to your heart's
content- that's one of the great things about Free software.
I'm on Windows. There's no compiler.
There are many compilers* for windows, includ
On 19/06/2025 18.27, Rob Hallam wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 19:33, Mark Filipak
wrote:
Well, Rob, I can't read 'C' code, so I'm unqualified to know whether Paul's
patch is any good. We
will all see that when it's published and compiled and linked and distributed,
eh?
It is published. You
On 6/19/2025 4:33 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Did you see the movie "THE MATRIX"? The pill was the blue pill that
evoked conformity.
No.
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscri
On 6/19/2025 6:11 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 19/06/2025 18.09, Rob Hallam wrote:
The internet runs on Linux. Phones run on Linux. Embedded devices run
Linux.
Come on, Rob. The Internet doesn't run on Linux any more than companies
run on Oracle.
And what runs on phones and appliances could h
On 19/06/2025 18.09, Rob Hallam wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 15:04, Mark Filipak
wrote:
The internet runs on Linux. Phones run on Linux. Embedded devices run Linux.
Come on, Rob. The Internet doesn't run on Linux any more than companies run on
Oracle.
And what runs on phones and appliances
On 19/06/2025 18.27, Rob Hallam wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 19:33, Mark Filipak
wrote:
I have a story. I'm corresponding with a fellow who wrote a popular subtitling
program. He wrote it
in 2000, rewrote it in 2013, and is currently rewriting it, again. He seems to
have little idea
regardi
On 19/06/2025 18.31, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/19/2025 11:44 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 19/06/2025 12.16, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/19/2025 3:37 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Take a pill, Z.
what is that supposed to mean?
Please answer that.
Did you see the movie "THE MATRIX"? The pill was the b
On 6/19/2025 11:44 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 19/06/2025 12.16, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/19/2025 3:37 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Take a pill, Z.
what is that supposed to mean?
Please answer that.
Why would I search for 'ffmpeg "sost"', Z?
To find out what it could mean, of course. Heck, y
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 19:33, Mark Filipak
wrote:
>
> On 19/06/2025 13.42, Rob Hallam wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 17:04, Mark Filipak
> > wrote:
> >> I apologize, Rob. I was going by the bodies, not the headers. The
> >> intervening time was actually a
> >> little less than 2 hours. I apol
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 15:04, Mark Filipak
wrote:
> On 19/06/2025 08.47, Rob Hallam wrote:
> > It's bizarre that FOSS is held up as an example of failure, never
> > succeeding, much worse than commercial software etc given the internet
> > is pretty near all hosted on Linux stacks, Android is Linu
So Mark, for all his self-obstruction by insisting on terms which others
don't understand, and for all the digressions into rants about free
software in general, is asking a valid question here.
On 2025-06-19 14:05, Mark Filipak wrote:
...When FFmpeg reports "Input #0, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2,
On 19/06/2025 15.34, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.06.25 um 21:33 schrieb Mark Filipak:
If the input is 8-bit ybr420-smpte170m, then the head end of the processing pipeline is also 8-bit
ybr420-smpte170m. Yes or No?
what else should it be moron?
I'm not asking what it should be. I'm asking what
On 19/06/2025 16.55, hydra-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org wrote:
On 19/06/2025 08.03, Reindl Harald wrote:
There is a FOSS clone of TextPad. It's named NotePad++. It's somewhat
pathetic. >
Cough.
Had been sympathetic with making things clearer, but definitely lost me with
that and the FOSS "rea
On 19/06/2025 08.03, Reindl Harald wrote:
> There is a FOSS clone of TextPad. It's named NotePad++. It's somewhat
pathetic.
Cough.
Had been sympathetic with making things clearer, but definitely lost me with
that and the FOSS "reasoning".
Oh dear.
Good luck with continuing to improve clarity w
Am 19.06.25 um 21:33 schrieb Mark Filipak:
If the input is 8-bit ybr420-smpte170m, then the head end of the
processing pipeline is also 8-bit ybr420-smpte170m. Yes or No?
what else should it be moron?
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.
On 19/06/2025 15.27, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.06.25 um 21:26 schrieb Mark Filipak:
On 19/06/2025 15.22, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.06.25 um 21:08 schrieb Mark Filipak:
On 19/06/2025 15.02, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.06.25 um 20:53 schrieb Mark Filipak:
Why would I search for 'ffmpeg "sost"
Am 19.06.25 um 21:26 schrieb Mark Filipak:
On 19/06/2025 15.22, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.06.25 um 21:08 schrieb Mark Filipak:
On 19/06/2025 15.02, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.06.25 um 20:53 schrieb Mark Filipak:
Why would I search for 'ffmpeg "sost"'
why would i search for "+short" in c
On 19/06/2025 15.22, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.06.25 um 21:08 schrieb Mark Filipak:
On 19/06/2025 15.02, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.06.25 um 20:53 schrieb Mark Filipak:
Why would I search for 'ffmpeg "sost"'
why would i search for "+short" in context of dig?
I have no idea. Why don't you
Am 19.06.25 um 21:08 schrieb Mark Filipak:
On 19/06/2025 15.02, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.06.25 um 20:53 schrieb Mark Filipak:
Why would I search for 'ffmpeg "sost"'
why would i search for "+short" in context of dig?
I have no idea. Why don't you tell me, eh?
i tell you: some things
On 19/06/2025 15.02, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.06.25 um 20:53 schrieb Mark Filipak:
Why would I search for 'ffmpeg "sost"'
why would i search for "+short" in context of dig?
I have no idea. Why don't you tell me, eh?
i tell you: some things require brain and knowledge - since you don't
Am 19.06.25 um 20:53 schrieb Mark Filipak:
Why would I search for 'ffmpeg "sost"'
why would i search for "+short" in context of dig?
I have no idea. Why don't you tell me, eh?
i tell you: some things require brain and knowledge - since you don't
have both you are helpless
if thats all
On 19/06/2025 14.50, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.06.25 um 20:44 schrieb Mark Filipak:
On 19/06/2025 12.16, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/19/2025 3:37 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
I suggest you reread the basic ffmpeg manual at https:// www.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.html; it's
always good to reread the basics,
Am 19.06.25 um 20:44 schrieb Mark Filipak:
On 19/06/2025 12.16, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/19/2025 3:37 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
I suggest you reread the basic ffmpeg manual at https://
www.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.html; it's always good to reread the basics,
sometimes useful things pop out afresh.
On 19/06/2025 12.16, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/19/2025 3:37 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
I suggest you reread the basic ffmpeg manual at https:// www.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.html; it's always
good to reread the basics, sometimes useful things pop out afresh.
Take a pill, Z.
what is that supposed to mean
On 19/06/2025 13.42, Rob Hallam wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 17:04, Mark Filipak
wrote:
I apologize, Rob. I was going by the bodies, not the headers. The intervening
time was actually a
little less than 2 hours. I apologize for the error.
I appreciate you taking the time to correct the mist
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 17:04, Mark Filipak
wrote:
> I apologize, Rob. I was going by the bodies, not the headers. The intervening
> time was actually a
> little less than 2 hours. I apologize for the error.
I appreciate you taking the time to correct the mistake, thanks.
> 2 hours... Hmmm... Yo
Hi Andrew,
On 19/06/2025 12.13, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote:
чт, 19 июн. 2025 г., 18:06 Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org>:
On 19/06/2025 10.42, BloodMan wrote:
If someone pays a lot for the system, wants to have a sugary interface of the
system and programs,
at the same
On 6/19/2025 3:37 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
I suggest you reread the basic ffmpeg manual at https://
www.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.html; it's always good to reread the basics,
sometimes useful things pop out afresh.
Take a pill, Z.
what is that supposed to mean?
You folks will never understand a user
чт, 19 июн. 2025 г., 18:06 Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org>:
> On 19/06/2025 10.42, BloodMan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > W dniu 2025-06-19 o 16:03, Mark Filipak pisze:
> >> Linux is FOSS. There are no interface standards in Linux because no one
> is paid to establish and
> >> en
On 19/06/2025 10.36, Rob Hallam wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 14:45, Mark Filipak
wrote:
On 19/06/2025 08.51, Rob Hallam wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 11:57, Paul B Mahol
wrote:
Fixed:
https://github.com/librempeg/librempeg/commit/d572c8dae396fdcb719b030faafdc036104ae94d
Kudos for taking
On 19/06/2025 10.42, BloodMan wrote:
Hi,
W dniu 2025-06-19 o 16:03, Mark Filipak pisze:
Linux is FOSS. There are no interface standards in Linux because no one is paid to establish and
enforce standards. The result is programs that don't interoperate -- Hell, Linux applications
don't even have
Hi,
W dniu 2025-06-19 o 16:03, Mark Filipak pisze:
Linux is FOSS. There are no interface standards in Linux because no one
is paid to establish and enforce standards. The result is programs that
don't interoperate -- Hell, Linux applications don't even have
consistent font sizes.
You use arg
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 14:45, Mark Filipak
wrote:
>
> On 19/06/2025 08.51, Rob Hallam wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 11:57, Paul B Mahol
> > wrote:
> >> Fixed:
> >> https://github.com/librempeg/librempeg/commit/d572c8dae396fdcb719b030faafdc036104ae94d
> >
> > Kudos for taking the time to find
On 19/06/2025 10.18, Paul B Mahol wrote:> > FFmpeg is more than just CLI tools.
It is? What more is there, Paul?
"Just": I'm not saying that FFmpeg is trivial. FFmpeg is definitely _not_
trivial.
Regards,
Mark.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-use
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 2:16 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> On 19/06/2025 10.08, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> > Am 19.06.25 um 16:03 schrieb Mark Filipak:
> >> Linux is FOSS. There are no interface standards in Linux because no one
> is paid to establish and
> >
On 19/06/2025 10.08, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.06.25 um 16:03 schrieb Mark Filipak:
Linux is FOSS. There are no interface standards in Linux because no one is paid to establish and
enforce standards. The result is programs that don't interoperate -- Hell, Linux applications
don't even have co
Am 19.06.25 um 16:03 schrieb Mark Filipak:
Linux is FOSS. There are no interface standards in Linux because no one
is paid to establish and enforce standards. The result is programs that
don't interoperate -- Hell, Linux applications don't even have
consistent font sizes.
i switched 19 year
On 19/06/2025 08.47, Rob Hallam wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 13:09, Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user
wrote:
Everything Mark is saying in this email is true.
Everything? Even the trivially-disprovable-for-decades old saw about
'you can't make money writing FOSS software' ?
It's bizarre that FOS
Am 19.06.25 um 14:33 schrieb Mark Filipak:
In fact, I am qualified. I ran projects in Silicon Valley for 25 years
that's no qualification at all
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To
On 19/06/2025 09.45, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 1:40 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
On topic:
If the input is 8-bit ybr420-smpte170m, then the head end of the
processing pipeline is also 8-bit
ybr420-smpte170m. Yes or No?
Some people neve
On 19/06/2025 08.51, Rob Hallam wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 11:57, Paul B Mahol
wrote:
Fixed:
https://github.com/librempeg/librempeg/commit/d572c8dae396fdcb719b030faafdc036104ae94d
Kudos for taking the time to find and address this; it's a shame that
the effort does not seem to have been ap
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 1:40 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> On topic:
>
> If the input is 8-bit ybr420-smpte170m, then the head end of the
> processing pipeline is also 8-bit
> ybr420-smpte170m. Yes or No?
>
Some people never change mind, never learn new thin
On topic:
If the input is 8-bit ybr420-smpte170m, then the head end of the processing pipeline is also 8-bit
ybr420-smpte170m. Yes or No?
Regards,
Mark.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-us
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 14:06, Erik Dobberkau
wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 11:57, Paul B Mahol
> > wrote:
> > > Fixed:
> > > https://github.com/librempeg/librempeg/commit/d572c8dae396fd
> > cb719b030faafdc036104ae94d
> >
> > Kudos for taking the time to find and address this; it's a shame t
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 11:57, Paul B Mahol
> wrote:
> > Fixed:
> > https://github.com/librempeg/librempeg/commit/d572c8dae396fd
> cb719b030faafdc036104ae94d
>
> Kudos for taking the time to find and address this; it's a shame that
> the effort does not seem to have been appreciated.
>
>
Note: Th
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 11:57, Paul B Mahol
wrote:
> Fixed:
> https://github.com/librempeg/librempeg/commit/d572c8dae396fdcb719b030faafdc036104ae94d
Kudos for taking the time to find and address this; it's a shame that
the effort does not seem to have been appreciated.
Cheers,
Rob
___
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 13:09, Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user
wrote:
> Everything Mark is saying in this email is true.
Everything? Even the trivially-disprovable-for-decades old saw about
'you can't make money writing FOSS software' ?
It's bizarre that FOSS is held up as an example of failure, nev
Am 19.06.25 um 14:09 schrieb Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user:
Everything Mark is saying in this email is true.
The desperate desire of free software people for wider acceptance is fairly obvious. It is not something that can possibly happen until the world of free software figures out that the pur
On 19/06/2025 08.03, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.06.25 um 13:59 schrieb Mark Filipak:
My file manager and my text editor are both commercial programs. They work superbly and are well
documented in English, not programmers' pigeon English.
then use your file manager and text editor
oh - both
Everything Mark is saying in this email is true.
The desperate desire of free software people for wider acceptance is fairly
obvious. It is not something that can possibly happen until the world of free
software figures out that the purpose of software is to do work for humans.
This is currentl
Am 19.06.25 um 13:59 schrieb Mark Filipak:
My file manager and my text editor are both commercial programs. They
work superbly and are well documented in English, not programmers'
pigeon English.
then use your file manager and text editor
oh - both can't do complex things
Codesmiths shoul
On 19/06/2025 06.48, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.06.25 um 12:37 schrieb Mark Filipak:
On 18/06/2025 23.56, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
The output -told- you that #0:2 is subtitles, so an error message containing that is probably
about those subtitles. Seemed obvious to me and I don't work much with ffm
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 10:37 AM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> On 18/06/2025 23.56, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
> > On 6/18/2025 2:41 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
> >> Z, how am I or anyone to know what "sost#0:2" means? I don't even know
> what "sost" means.
> > (does that
Am 19.06.25 um 12:37 schrieb Mark Filipak:
On 18/06/2025 23.56, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
The output -told- you that #0:2 is subtitles, so an error message
containing that is probably about those subtitles. Seemed obvious to
me and I don't work much with ffmpeg.
I suggest you reread the basic ff
On 18/06/2025 23.56, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/18/2025 2:41 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Z, how am I or anyone to know what "sost#0:2" means? I don't even know what
"sost" means.
(does that specifically matter? I don't think so.)
After that RTFM? (I think you've used -map before so probably und
57 matches
Mail list logo
