Hi,
Could you please tell me your best tips (according to scan quality) of the
slide and negative films. What do you think what is better
in the fast range (400) slide film or negative ?
For taking pictures of my kids the Velvia and Provia100 are too slow. I am
using Provia 400F and Ektachrome
In a message dated 9/27/2000 8:45:27 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anyone tried Vuescan with the APS(IX240) adapter? I cannot find any of
the normal settings in Vuescan.
I haven't added any special options for this adapter. The problem
is that there isn't any way I can figure out
Like apply fourier analysis and transforms to it, or use digital filtering
and signal processing. But we don't. Why not? I dunno.
Seems we'd rather piddle about with matrix filters, and other amateur-night
stuff. Anyone got any idea how to turn a TIFF into a bitstream or WAV file?
I
In a message dated 9/27/2000 1:29:36 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the last couple of days I have made some comparison scans using both
Vuescan (V. 6.1 beta 6) and Polaroid Insite (V. 4.5) on the same negs.
You might upgrade to VueScan 6.1.1, although there aren't
any sharpness
In a message dated 9/27/2000 9:37:31 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nikon specifically say *not* to use ICE on Kodachrome slides in the
NikonScan reference manual. I assume this would apply to VueScan for the
same reasons (regardless of what they are).
The dust removal in VueScan works
Bruce Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikon specifically say *not* to use ICE on Kodachrome slides in the
NikonScan reference manual. I assume this would apply to VueScan for the
same reasons (regardless of what they are).
As with silver based BW films, ICE will probably fail because the
In a message dated 9/27/2000 9:06:21 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would appear the default "automatic" is not
appropriate for backlit subjects.
The exposure of the scanner has nothing to do with the
existence of a backlit subject.
The exposure of the scanner for negative film is
Vincent writes ...
I am using SilverFast (v4.2.8r02) with my Nikon LS30 film scanner.
When
scanning a negative or slide on 2700 dpi with ICE the computer
cannot
process the data fast enough so that the LS30 makes a smooth scan.
...
... My computer has a 400 MHz Pentium II processor and a
shAf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW ... I use a LS-2000 ... and I have no idea if these features are
available if the software detects a LS-30 ... or even if your scanner
comes with the "feeder" adapter(?)
AFAIK the only missing settings are the single pass multiscanning
and the high bit
Roger Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob, I may have at least part of the answer. I looked at 3 films
under a 400x microscope - Kodak Gold 100, Fuji Provia F,
and Kodak Elite Chrome 100. It was hard to find areas of
comparable colour and density
What was on the pieces of film you were
Could you please tell me your best tips (according to scan quality) of the
slide and negative films. What do you think what is better
in the fast range (400) slide film or negative ?
Tom, I'm just starting an exercise to try to determine which films look
best when scanned. What film scanner
In a message dated 9/28/2000 6:11:34 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW ... I use a LS-2000 ... and I have no idea if these features are
available if the software detects a LS-30 ... or even if your scanner
comes with the "feeder" adapter(?)
AFAIK the only missing settings are
Vincent Cleij wrote:
I am using SilverFast (v4.2.8r02) with my Nikon LS30 film scanner. When
scanning a negative or slide on 2700 dpi with ICE the computer cannot
process the data fast enough so that the LS30 makes a smooth scan. It makes
the scan with small irregular steps. When scanning
I do not want to start a flame war, but I regard your post as very
impolite. I did not quote any Kodak info, nor any Kodak web page.
Do not measure others by your own standards. I am professional photographer
and I have MSc in chemistry. I spent half of my professional life in photo
industry,
Ed writes ...
The exposure of the scanner for negative film is adjusted
to to map the color of the orange mask to roughly white.
This lengthens the green and blue exposure time relative
to the red exposure time.
...
This reminds me of a problem I'm having with one LS adapter versus
15 matches
Mail list logo
