Austin Franklin wrote:
As I said above, regardless
of what causes the effect, my prints have less artifacts if the output
resolution
from the software is 240dpi. Previously I had been using 300dpi but
switched
after I discovered the reduction in artifacts.
Understood, and agree,
In order to enable usage different settings of Vuescan I built a
profile for each setting, by scanning the Q60 at each setting and
building a profile.
Sorry, I'm not sure I understand. Are you saying that you have a
calibration file for each VueScan setting neutral / white balance /
etc. ?
Forwarded Message
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 16:31:08 -
From: johnprendergast.freeserve.co.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help (Please) Scan Multi
I am having great difficulty getting a post that I want published onto
the
filmscanners digest, something to do with
That is total bunk. Scientism may be a religion, but science isn't. Saying
it is indicates you don't know what it is.
Science proceeds from axioms, axioms are articles of faith even if provisional
and liable to revision. Scientific method ain't religion, but we shouldn't
forget the whole
The Leafscan software does the gamma correction to the 16 bit
data, while it turns it into 8 bit data, so you don't get (99.99% of
the time) any dropped codes...
That's how scanner software should work with any scanner capable of 8bits,
and if it doesn't, is the reason for saving and
Regardless, the suggestion of 2 to 2.5 times the line screen as an image
resolution has been a good rule of thumb in my experience
My understanding is that the recommended pre-press line screen is 1.5 to 2.0
the image resolution and not the 2.0 to 2.5. Are we talking about the same
thing
Of the things listed below as noteworthy upgrades, the following are not
upgrades per se since they are also found in the original Minolta Scan Multi
software:
Exposure control... You can window a specific area on the film for
determination of exposure..lock in the exposure and then scan the
Stewart,
Unfortunately I am not a Viewscan user. Have you tried Insight and
Insight with a raw scan.
David
-Original Message-From: Stewart Musket
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 2:55
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: filmscanners:
Scanning Problem?
Laurie writes ...
regarding:
Regardless, the suggestion of 2 to 2.5 times the line
screen as an image resolution has been a good
rule of thumb in my experience
My understanding is that the recommended pre-press line
screen is 1.5 to 2.0 the image resolution and
not the 2.0 to 2.5.
Buck, I am also very new here and have learned a great deal, and a few new
good jokes. I have recently purchased a Nikon LS-30 and that would be my
recomendation for about $649 new. You will not be sorry! I only hope that
one day I will be able to use it to it's fullest along with Photoshop. But
I recently scanned an ASA 400 negative with S4000 and Vuescan 6.3.9
using Windows 98. The outdoor scene is a two-year old child holding
her face in amazement at the sight of many very large pumpkins which
dominate the scene. When I use levels and curves, the final product
is fairly good
I don't believe this number has much to do with desktop printers, whether
it
be a pattern dither, stoichastic or random.
Hmmm! That is something which I have been wondering myself. But some
scanner software asks for the user to put in both a scan resolution and a
line screen figure; while
Buck wrote:
Microtek 4T and the Kodak RFS-3600. I have no one to ask about which
would be best for an amateur interested in enlarging slides to 8X10. Does
the difference in 2700 to 4000 dpi make any difference with my equipment?
Buck, I have a Nikon LS30 but if you can afford the Polaroid
Roman wrote:
2. win98, memturbo indicating CPU 10-35%, faster scan.
Both images were 2700 dpi, full frame. Saved and opened in Picture
Publisher 8 (800%) to see individual pixels.
Can you see jaggies?
No. But then I don't always get jaggies on my machine either. The fact
that your LS30 has a
But Art, didn't they just find that the chicken soup that Jewish mothers,
throughout history, gave to their family for colds and flu actually works to
prevent and cure colds and flu? I take it that it all goes to show that
traditional methods sometimes actually do work.
-Original
Laurie Solomon wrote:
Regardless, the suggestion of 2 to 2.5 times the line screen as an image
resolution has been a good rule of thumb in my experience
My understanding is that the recommended pre-press line screen is 1.5 to 2.0
the image resolution and not the 2.0 to 2.5. Are we
16 matches
Mail list logo
