Lynda Farabee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My first problem is making multiple scans with Coolscan II. The
software indicates a strip of negs can be scanned at once. But I get
one scanned and then nothing more.??? How do I get multiple
scans? -L
It's really easy to do with Vuescan, but
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:28:47 -0600 Bob Glenna Marin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Is there a good rule-of-thumb for the amount of RAM needed for scanning
editing files at different resolution in Photoshop. This is probably "more
is better," but are some specific recommendations on this?
I
HI, Dave!
One option that I haven't seen mentioned here is one of the less expensive
film scanners, the
PrimeFilm 1800U. I have seen these on Ebay for a couple of hundred USD.
For example:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1201951441
It appears not to be as good a scanner
At 9:30 PM +1000 on 12/15/00, Rob Geraghty wrote:
Lynda Farabee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My first problem is making multiple scans with Coolscan II. The
software indicates a strip of negs can be scanned at once. But I get
one scanned and then nothing more.??? How do I get multiple
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:30:21 -0800 Dave Suurballe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have a couple hundred 100-foot rolls of 35mm negative film, exposed and
processed, and I am looking at the pix with a Tamron FotoVix or whatever
it's called. It's a little lightbox with optics and a TV camera
Ed didn't send this to the list so I will forward it.
Henry Richardson
http://www.bigfoot.com/~hrich
Original Message Follows
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Did I send this properly?
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 05:11:54 EST
In a message dated 12/14/2000 4:16:58
The scanner has some manual buttons on the unit itself; you can advance
frame by frame if you so choose and scan the selected frame.
As for the stability of the film in the scanner, that is another matter. I
have a roll of 36 (sometimes 37) hanging freely and unsupported from the
scanner, and
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:58:35 -0800 Mike ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I tend to use a very large brush with the dodge and/or burn tool as my experence is
in
a
conventional darkroom and that is most like how I would dodge and burn in the
darkroom.
Large brushes are cruel unusual punishment
I have a 8 gig 5400rpm disk 40% full. What I want to do is get enough memory that
photoshop doesn't have to go to disk to use the burn tool.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 12/14/00 at 7:57 PM Frank Paris wrote:
I have a 733 MHz Pentium III. How big a disk do you have and what
How you achieve this? In CanonScan dpi box you can't put anything more than
2999?
Sal
- Original Message -
From: Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: FS2710 questions: speed/blue
Henry writes ...
Ed didn't send this to the list so I will forward it.
In a message dated 12/14/2000 4:16:58 PM EST,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
Further, is it also true that there is no real
disadvantage to always using the strongest filter
-- Scour -- instead of the weakest
At Vuescan - Hamrick Software: http://www.hamrick.com/
IronWorks
- Original Message -
From: "Lynda Farabee" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: newbie at scanning.
Where do I get Vuescan?
--Lynda
I would not get a cheap card. A terrific 2D card is the Matrox 450. It has
32 Megs, has a 360 MHz DAC, and only costs $150. Well worth the modest
premium over the cheapies for the razor sharp image you get. I had the 400
Max and just replaced it with the 450 a couple days ago. Advantages: $50
Is anyone else having problems getting on to ed's site?
He told me a couple of days ago he had changed the server, but I still can't
on...
Tim A
In a message dated 12/15/2000 12:26:08 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is anyone else having problems getting on to ed's site?
He told me a couple of days ago he had changed the server, but I still
can't
on...
I changed to a new server, and it looks like the traffic has shifted to
Lynda,
The following may help with batch scanning from the negative strip.
"You select each thumbnail image and set your adjustments for each image as
needed just as you normally would. Then, in a windows environment, do a
control left click on each thumbnail image in the thumbnail tray. All
Rob -
The way an OS sets up a RAM disk is by "stealing" or allocating some RAM
from main memory. This is, essentially what PS is doing normally. I would
find it very hard to believe that a RAM disk would help speed things up when
1) there is now less main memory, and 2) everything would now have
Thank you very much for this important infos. I will wait till beginning of
year to see what happens with a Nikon 4000 DPI
Regards
Thierry Zysman
De : "D. John Anderson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Répondre à : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date : Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:12:59 -0800
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet :
At 12:37 PM -0500 on 12/15/00, Dale Gail wrote:
Lynda,
The following may help with batch scanning from the negative strip.
"You select each thumbnail image and set your adjustments for each image as
needed just as you normally would. Then, in a windows environment,
I think that's my
Further, is it also true that there is no real
disadvantage to always using the strongest filter
-- Scour -- instead of the weakest filter -- Clean?
Correct. With an infrared channel, the only
difference between the filters is the radius of
the largest dust spot that will be removed.
Thanks for the info.
You mentioned video cards which brings up another question. In a month or so,
I'm going to build a dedicated digital darkroom computer. What, in the
opinion of this group, is the best video card available for photoshop? I've
been told by some that for this
Dale writes ...
I've narrowed my choices down to three scanners. The Nikon
LS2000, Minolta Scan Elite and the Polaroid 4000.
My first two choices are based on the IR/ICE feature and
the Polaroid because (according to their web site) has a
dust/scratch removal feature in the software that
How you achieve this? In CanonScan dpi box you can't put anything more than
2999?
Sal
Hi Sal
Accessing the Canoscan plug-in through Photoshop I can set the Resolution
slider to a max dpi of 5440. In the preferences I can set a custom dpi (max
5440, 200%) to appear in the drop down
I had an HP Photosmart until October 1999 and replaced it with a Minolta
Scan Dual at that time. About two weeks ago I bought a Minolta Scan Elite
-- mainly for the infrared channel clean-up feature. Vuescan had a problem
with the Clean, Scrub and Scour filters until version 6.3.19 and now
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Larry Berman
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 4:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Graphics card
I agree on the Matrox. I've used the G400 for over a year with dual
monitors on a
Mikkel Høj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It takes some time to update my screen in PS6.
(On a PC with enough RAM and a PIII processsor.)
Is it my no name (2D, 8 MB shared) graphics card? Or?
Watch the hard drive for activity. It's likely that the process you are
waiting for has
caused PS to write
Bob Glenna Marin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way an OS sets up a RAM disk is by "stealing" or allocating some RAM
from main memory.
I'm aware of that. I program computers for a living. :)
This is, essentially what PS is doing normally.
In some respects yes - for things like the workspace
Hi Frank,
It's seamless. It's as if you have one big monitor. Most 32 bit Win
applications support dual monitors. I'm using a 21 inch for my main and a
13 inch for my tool pallets. I also run ACDSee on the 13 and drag
thumbnails onto the 21 inch to work on them in PS. In Dreamweaver I can
on 15/12/00 8:55 pm, Rob Geraghty at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does PS do with 384MB of RAM that it still
needs more, or still uses the hard drive??
Photoshop writes out the undo/history files to disk I think, rather than
keeping them in memory. If you are working on a 25 Mb file then
Henry Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I sent my first message to this list yesterday and I don't know if it
actually got out since I have not received any replies. I will send it
again. I hope someone can help.
I for one was waiting for a response from Ed.
in always using the Clean
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 23:16:34 +0100 Salinger Igor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
- resolution: I understand that 2720dpi is max optical resolution, however,
I experimented by putting 2999 (max allowed dpi value) and can't notice
much, if any degradation of sharpness/detail caused by
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 23:16:34 +0100 Salinger Igor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
- resolution: I understand that 2720dpi is max optical resolution, however,
I experimented by putting 2999 (max allowed dpi value) and can't notice
much, if any degradation of sharpness/detail caused by
32 matches
Mail list logo
