(Like most of the messages on this list aren't off-topic *anyway* at the
moment!)
Art said..
>I'm waiting for the monitor salesmen to start calling, or at least
>leaving e-mail messages...
>"Being that you are still browsing the web with an antiquated 17"
>monitor, and missing the visual splendo
At 21:28 9/03/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>When I installed Win2K I found that it detected my modem and installed
>the driver of the modem itself. I thought I might need to turn my house
>upside down to find my modem driver diskette. So Win2K might actually has
>all the drivers included for you not so
Ed wrote:
> I don't run a business or NT workstations and already run WinMe, which to
my
> understanding is the consumer version of Windows 2000 Professional.
No, the two products aren't really related that way. ME is an upgrade of
Win98SE,
and Win2K is an upgrade of NT4.
> My point was that ma
"Ramesh Kumar_C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think one year back Microsoft stopped support to Alpha.
> There is no Win2000 on Alpha.
NT4 runs nicely on Alpha, but no colour management.
Rob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Now for something completely different:
> what is the difference between the Scan Dual II and Scan Dual II White? Both
> come up after a search of cdnet and znet, with the White version being about
> $50 more. It may be the Genuine Fractals software, but I'm not s
Laurie Solomon wrote:
> My neck is located in East Central Illinois. If you look at all the
> pre-packaged systems advertised in the newspapers and in catalogs, they are
> offered with 17" monitors with 19" being the upgrade; but they have been
> changing to making 19" monitors the standard mo
Laurie Solomon wrote:
> One possible response might be that some people keep the working image
> on the primary monitor and the original image along with the palettes
> and tool bars on the secondary monitor. This original image is used as
> a comparative reference when making changes to th
Quoton wrote:
> If your mainboard is 133MHz capable you really should take all the
> advantage of it now. My Minolta scanner took nearly 2 minutes to scan
> a 35mm frame at full resolution on my pC-100 system (dual 550MHz CPU,
> 512MB PC-100 SDRAM) but with my newly assembled 933MHz single CPU
Once again, everything you say is likely true in the United States of
Waste and Consumption, but it sure isn't true here in Western Canada,
and I bet it also isn't true in Europe, Australia, and most other places.
Art
Mike Kersenbrock wrote:
> Arthur Entlich wrote:
>
>
>> Lastly, even if
>>
Umax tended to be stingy with bit depth when it was expensive to
provide. Often their scanners would list something like
Bit Depth: 36 bit*
*-B.E.T., using the patented Bit Enhancement Technology in hardware
(actual bit depth 30 bit)
They ultimately were forced to stop doing this as a class
Austin Franklin wrote:
>>
>> Actually, you are both right, and wrong.
>
>
> OK, Arthur, nothing you said contradicted anything in my statement, so I
> don't get where I was "wrong".
I thought it would be beneficial for you to see the word "wrong", so
you'd recognize it, in the very unlike
Dont forget that only NT ,Win 2k and the latest Apple O/S support dual
processors so its no use having win 98/98 on a dual board.
regards
Michael Wilkinson. 106 Holyhead Road,Ketley, Telford.Shropshire TF 15 DJ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.infocus-photography.co.uk
For Trannies and Negs from Digit
At 03:26 10-03-01 -0800, you wrote:
>Once again, everything you say is likely true in the United States of
>Waste and Consumption, but it sure isn't true here in Western Canada, and
>I bet it also isn't true in Europe, Australia, and most other places.
>
>Art
What !!- u mean there are other
Art wrote:
> Rick Berk wrote:
>
> > Hey Ed-
> > was interested in giving Vuescan a try,
> > I'd just like to know what I can expect... > > Rick
>
> Rick,
>
>...download the full program free of charge and not only see screen
> shots, but play with it and see how it works. The only difference
>
> >>
> >> Actually, you are both right, and wrong.
> >
> > OK, Arthur, nothing you said contradicted anything in my statement, so I
> > don't get where I was "wrong".
>
> I thought it would be beneficial for you to see the word "wrong", so
> you'd recognize it, in the very unlikely case you might
To Ed Hamrick and other Vuescan experts,
Currently I am using only the raw file generated by Vuescan (with I
-channel) load this into PS and
apply a profile conversion to Adobe RGB with an ICC profile created for
my scanner.
This gives me the best possible color/level/gamma balance results for
sl
on 3/10/01 2:08 AM, Arthur Entlich at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Now for something completely different:
>> what is the difference between the Scan Dual II and Scan Dual II White? Both
>> come up after a search of cdnet and znet, with the White version being
>Umax tended to be stingy with bit depth when it was expensive to
>provide. Often their scanners would list something like
>
>Bit Depth: 36 bit*
>
>*-B.E.T., using the patented Bit Enhancement Technology in hardware
>(actual bit depth 30 bit)
>
It sure isn't small.
>Dimensions: 28.7" x 20.8" x
Is anyone else running this combination. I recently installed Win 2000 and
although it recognizes my Adaptec 2930CU SCSI card, and the Coolscan III,
and I have upgraded the Nikon driver to Win 2000 from the Nikon website,
neither Vuescan or Nikonscan can find the scanner. I have tried the
download
Is anyone else running this combination. I recently installed Win 2000 and
although it recognizes my Adaptec 2930CU SCSI card, and the Coolscan III,
and I have upgraded the Nikon driver to Win 2000 from the Nikon website,
neither Vuescan or Nikonscan can find the scanner. I have tried the
download
Stuart wrote:
> >Once again, everything you say is likely true in the United States of
> >Waste and Consumption, but it sure isn't true here in Western Canada, and
> >I bet it also isn't true in Europe, Australia, and most other places.
> >
> >Art
>
> What !!- u mean there are other countrie
I should have known to go to Ed Hamrick's site after the installation,
downloaded the ASPI software from Ed's site, rebooted, and it works like a
dream!
Ed, now how about a file to fix my old USR external 56k modem, I have to
reinstall it every time I reboot, and the needed file has been unavaila
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Paris) wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Derek Clarke
> > Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 3:57 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
> >
> >
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark T.
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 3:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: OT, in fact *way* off-topic Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about..
>
>
> (Like most of the messages on this list aren't off
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
>
> Don't you mean "it turns out to be real... expensive... to get that spec
> out of it ;-)
>
> I wasn't planning on spending the cost of the scanner a second time to
> get it to run at the speced speed, by having to buy a 933MHz processor
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 3:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
>
>
> Once again, everything you say is likely true in the U
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 2:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like
> W98SE?
>
>
> It's a better OS overall. MS want
Can the frame number be accessed from a drop down box (giving the choice of
one through six) or by up and down arrows? Of course besides actually
typing in the number. That way all the default settings can be controlled
by mouse.
How about a batch scan process where you type in the range of fr
Hi,
I use the same combination, just with a different SCSI Adapter (DawiControl
DC7975U). After updating the Nikon driver like you did no problems at all.
regards
andi
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Edwin Eleazer
> Sent: Saturday, M
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Derek Clarke
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 8:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
>
>
> An inappropriate choice of control is just as much a bug
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
> > Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 2:56 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like
> > W98SE?
> >
> >
> > It's a better
As Henry says, CLI means "Command Line Interface". (Like DOS
and native Unix, and millions of programs running under
them.)
To assist my filmscanning, I still use only one example
regularly:
Open a DOS window, and type the drive letter for your CD-ROM
drive. Type "DIR /s >C:\files.txt". This put
In a message dated 3/10/2001 10:18:55 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> To Ed: Would you consider to implement an optional control that allows
> one to apply the Clean option
> also on the Raw file ?
The output of the raw file happens before the processing (including
cleaning) o
In a message dated 3/10/2001 12:26:29 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Can the frame number be accessed from a drop down box (giving the choice of
> one through six) or by up and down arrows? Of course besides actually
> typing in the number. That way all the default settings can be contro
I had the same problem after a new
installation of Win 2000 pro. I called Nikon because their instructions say to
install the ASPI32.exe drivers from the Adaptec site. So I went to get them from
the Adaptec site and upon reading the driver info it warns you NOT to install
them on a Win 2000
I concur with you that fixed fonts, menus, dialog boxes, and tool boxes are
a design decision by Adobe. My understanding from posts over the years in a
number of forums and mailing lists was that the decision was made that it
was too much of a pain in the programming ass to program for dynamic di
Ed writes ...
> ...
> Unfortunately, VueScan always does the color space conversion,
> so this isn't really practical. I suppose I could add a color space
> of "Device" which left the pixels in the device's color space. Is
> this what you're looking for?
I'd be careful about calling it "de
Ed writes ...
> Unfortunately, VueScan always does the color space conversion,
> so this isn't really practical. I suppose I could add a color space
> of "Device" which left the pixels in the device's color space.
A very good color space option you may want to eventually offer is
an actual
Low prices; but probably a very heavy VAT tax in country and a mighty
shipping charge out of country.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Kersenbrock
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 10:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners:
shAf wrote:
>
> A very good color space option you may want to eventually offer is
> an actual color space specific to the scanner. For example, what if
> the scanner manufacturer provided a look-up table (LUT) type profile
> for the scanner ... wouldn't it be a good option to have for being
>I guess we had a choice between cheap monitors or Nationalized Health
>Care, and decided on the latter
If it were up to me, that would have been my choice also. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Saturday, March 10,
>>Once again, everything you say is likely true in the United States of
>>Waste and Consumption, but it sure isn't true here in Western Canada, and
>>I bet it also isn't true in Europe, Australia, and most other places.
>>
>>Art
>What !!- u mean there are other countries in the world >apart f
> >>
> >> Actually, you are both right, and wrong.
> >
> > OK, Arthur, nothing you said contradicted anything in my statement, so I
> > don't get where I was "wrong".
>
> I thought it would be beneficial for you to see the word "wrong", so
> you'd recognize it, in the very unlikely case you might
I've become a bit conservative about changes to my computing
environment. I'm running Win98SE on a Dell Dimension with
a 300 mhz PIII. It works ok for making 4000dpi scans and
conducting all the other digital darkroom legerdemain.
I thought about Win2k, saw that it takes a bigger 'footprint'
from
At 08:23 10-03-01 -0800, you wrote:
>Stuart wrote:
>
> > >Once again, everything you say is likely true in the United States of
> > >Waste and Consumption, but it sure isn't true here in Western Canada, and
> > >I bet it also isn't true in Europe, Australia, and most other places.
> > >
> > >Art
>
>I believe the United States should take over western Canada and bring you
guys up to speed.
We tried that once, and they burned down Washington, D.C.
Come to think of it, that's not such a bad idea! You guys got any matches
left, Art? ;-)
Scanning? Anyone?
--LRA
--
>I believe the United States should take over western Canada and bring you
guys up to speed.
We tried that once, and they burned down Washington, D.C.
Come to think of it, that's not such a bad idea! You guys got any matches
left, Art? ;-)
Scanning, anyone?--LRA
---
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Austin Franklin
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 10:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: OT: Co-processors & Amiga
>
>
> > >>
> > >> Actually, you are both right, and wrong.
> >
Larry wrote:
>Anyone want to buy a 32MB NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 4X AGPGraphics Card???
You said you were getting rid of this card to replace it with a two head one, as I
remember, but otherwise would you recommend the GeForce2 MX card, from some
manufacturer or another, for we filmscanner people?
C
Alan writes ...
> shAf wrote:
> >
> > A very good color space option you may want to eventually
offer is
> > an actual color space specific to the scanner. For example, what
if
> > the scanner manufacturer provided a look-up table (LUT) type
profile
> > for the scanner ... wouldn't it be a g
Frank wrote:
>By creating a common base for all their operating system offerings,
[Microsoft] will eliminate the need for Win9x/ME, and
they are trying to get rid of it. But that won't mean consumers will pay any
more for the replacement than they do now for ME. They will simply have a
$98 operat
I just released VueScan 7.0 Beta 1. I'm not widely publicizing
this, but the Windows, Mac OS and Linux versions can
be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/files/vuesca70.exe
http://www.hamrick.com/files/vuesca70.sit
http://www.hamrick.com/files/vuesca70.tgz
What's new in version 7.0
If I don't clean my e-mailbox nearly every day, it gets overwhelming--like
sox you've left in the hamper too long. :-)
So here are Replies and Thank-you's for people I didn't reply to in the
first place, and have better input now:
1. To whoever first posted the idea about the houshold static-wip
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 11:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
>
>
> I concur with you that fixed fonts, menus, dialog box
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lynn Allen
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 12:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: filmscanners: OT (was: Anyone using Win2K? )
>
>
> Frank wrote:
>
> >By creating a common base for all their opera
Well, Frank,
I cannot speak about the Mac since I have never owned or operated one. I am
not in any way attempting to refute what you say, since I am not
knowledgeable in engineering or programming issues; all I have attempted to
do is pass on the information I have been given over the years as t
Roger Miller -> Many thanks for the detailed reply.
You said:
>Scanning 35mm at 4000 dpi for use on the web was fine. But when I tried to
print >an 11x17, it was blurry even after sharpening in Photoshop. Worst of
all, >sharpening made the skin tones look blotchy."
I;m glad you mentioned thi
I'd like to see the width of the input boxes fixed for a maximum, so they do not
extend halfway across the screen in higher resolutions.
Second I would like all the controls to go straight down if there is room, I think you
moved some to the right column because you don't use them much?
Either
Colin,
I've not yet used the card. It was the least expensive option when ordering
my new system from Dell. I went that route because I had planned on getting
a dual monitor card anyway. That being said, I'm sure it's fine for
graphics. It just doesn't support dual monitors which is my prefere
Good Evening Ed...
I just downloaded 7.0 beta 1 successfully, and I have a question.I
cannot seem to find specific films under media..ie..Color negative..Fuji NHG
for example, or T-Max 100 under B&W...Am I "blind" or is it right under my
nose??..TIA..Eddie Wiseman
- Original Message -
I was wondering if anybody could comment on the relative quality of
Hewlett-Packard vs. Epson photo quality printers. I just heard from a
salesperson at a store that deals in both HP and Epson products that HP
printers are more trouble-free than Epson. Does this correspond to the
experience of p
I have made hundreds of prints up to 13"x19" with my Epson 2000p and it has
worked flawlessly. I can just tell from the way it sounds that it is a
well-made, precision instrument. I also have an HP 2000C and its photo
quality prints can't begin to compare with the Epson's. Granted, the HP
printer
Paul Patton wrote: "I was wondering if anybody could comment on the relative
quality of
Hewlett-Packard vs. Epson photo quality printers. I just heard from a
salesperson at a store that deals in both HP and Epson products that HP
printers are more trouble-free than Epson. Does this correspond to
It's on the right of the color tab. Be sure you don't have "Disk" select as
the device or it won't show.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Edward Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.0 Beta 1 Available
In a message dated 3/10/2001 6:40:20 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does it mention if Photoshop 5.0LE also comes with the white, as well as
the GF software?
Art
Says it comes with both for both "versions". I have since e-mailed Minolta
and was very surprised by the qu
>They will simply have a
> $98 operating system that is robust right down to the core.
>
Are you kidding ?
Those guys didn't suceed in 15 Years ... and now why the should ? ...
Are they feeling some fear for Linux ?
Sincerely.
Ezio
www.lucenti.com e-photography site
- Original Message
In a message dated 3/10/2001 11:04:22 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't see any spec that differed from my Scan Dual II, except that the
case is white rather than the usual putty. The price is as low as $444 + $7
shipping. See this url:
http://computers.cnet.com/har
Ed,
With the new interface, I no longer see the preview window when making
adjustments. Hitting Prev Mem does return focus to the preview window. I
thought it was better to have the preview window display when entering new
parameters in the boxes.
It would be nice to have these two options:
1.
In a message dated 3/10/2001 4:48:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Somebody's got to keep the giants honest--Microsoft, Adobe, AOL, the whole
lot of them--and the best candidates for that are the small developers,
Art's "Genius Companies." Lord knows, the Courts and the Con
Because Windows 2000 IS robust down to the core, and the new consumer
version will be based on the same engine. So no, I'm not kidding. And they
probably are bothered by Linux, the way flies sometimes bother you at a
picnic.
Frank Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u
Edwin Eleazer wrote:
>
> Is anyone else running this combination. I recently installed Win 2000 and
> although it recognizes my Adaptec 2930CU SCSI card, and the Coolscan III,
> and I have upgraded the Nikon driver to Win 2000 from the Nikon website,
> neither Vuescan or Nikonscan can find the
71 matches
Mail list logo
