The 4.2 value is typically related to the ability of the internal components
and has little relevance to the systems as a whole. In my view entirely
useless.
David
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Entlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 1:37 AM
At PMA there is only one of the new medium format scanners actually
scanning, the Polaroid Sprintscan 120
:)
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 7:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: filmscanners
When I return from PMA I can provide you with a zFTP location to download
the latest Beta. The Beta is primarily for ss120 issues. Email me directly
next week. The slide feeder is work in progress but I am reasonably
confident it will become available. We had one false start
David
-Original
Ah, isn't competition wonderful? In advance of the aggrssively-priced Nikon
Coolscan 8000 ED, it appears that Polaroid has lopped approx. $1,200 off the
suggested list price of their Sprintscan 120. It's now priced at $2,795
rather than the original $3,995. This according to a Polaroid press
"secret standard and methodology" sounds sinister to me
Actually you still have no idea what Polaroid does.
Because they use a secret standard and methodology it is as completely
meaningless as the manufacturer that tells you nothing.
Byron
I will work this issue. Give me a few days. This is the first I have heard
of this.
David
-Original Message-
From: chuck phelps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 7:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: filmscanners: SS4000 with Binuscan
David,
I am using a Mac, system 8.6, Insight 4.5, with 288MB RAM.
Thx,
Dave
"Hemingway, David J" wrote:
You did not mention Mac or PC. If PC be sure you are using Insight 4.5.1
from our web site.
David
-Original Message-
From: David Kotila [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Chuck,
You're right, I probably have made about 50 scans and then I got this error.
Very weird.
Thx,
Dave
chuck phelps wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:04:58 -0800 "David Kotila" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Hello,
I have Binuscan PhotoPerfect Advanced that I use with a SS4000
get a good comparison from an expierienced independent source or
gain the expertise yourself and do your own test.
David
-Original Message-
From: bjs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 9:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dynamic range solved was Re: fi
with
either solution.
One mans opinion
David
-Original Message-
From: Al Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 2:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ...
David Hemingway wrote:
Ice
Hello,
I have Binuscan PhotoPerfect Advanced that I use with a SS4000 scanner,
the problem is I keep getting this error that the "scanner is not
supported or Doggle is not attached", well since it is the "Advanced"
version it doesn't require a doggle and the SS4000 is chosen in the
preferences.
Groan. Here I am, all set to pounce on the SS120 when along comes Nikon with
its LS-8000 ED. The SS120 should appear in stores in late February, the
Nikon not 'til some time in May. Assuming I can wait an additional 3-4
months for the Nikon, what should be the compelling reasons why I might
ard (multi-format) to the Minolta
Dimage Scan Multi II)
David Corwin
Is this possible? This is the estimated price shown in the Nikon UK press
release appearing on Phil Askey's dpreview site. Visiting the Nikon UK site
directly, I found a detailed description of the new scanner with price
specified as "to be announced". I like Phil's release a lot better! Oh
or at
the very least have faith in an independent tester that knows what they are
doing. A novice can easily come to the wrong conclusion on some of these
tests.
David
-Original Message-
From: Rob Geraghty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 6:18 PM
To: [EMAIL
Here's an article with dates and prices:
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/010109/ca_nikon_m.html
Dave F.
Yes, it has been part of Insight for some time. Sitting at home here I
forget which tab but you should be able to locate it. Three radio buttons
for different levels.
David
-Original Message-
From: Stan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 9:13 PM
B+H (www.bhphoto.com) has just added the eagerly-awaited Polaroid Sprintscan
120 to its web site. Price shown is MSRP, $3999.95. Not currently in stock
(of course) but expected late February.
Dave F.
on 15.12.00 17:29, Larry Berman wrote:
Is there any word on Insight 5.0?
Polaroid appears to have pulled it from their server:
Oh dear, does that mean I'm not the only one having trouble making it work?!
--
David Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you world like to look at PCI 5.0 Beta. Let me know what you think.
David
ftp.polaroid.com/pub/imaging/input/polacolorinsight/
-Original Message-
From: Johnny Deadman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 10:33 AM
To: Filmscanners
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Can
Dale,
To be sure I will contact the Canadian sales manager. Either he or I will
get back to you soon.
David
-Original Message-
From: Dale Gail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 7:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Polaroid Sprintscan 120
Thanks guys,
I did'nt think it could be so easy.
I think I can say that now I have learnt everything about scanning.
From which scanner and printer I needed and to the knowledge to get results,
from this list.
Thanks again,
David.
street
price will probably be higher.
David Hemingway
Polaroid Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 8:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Polaroid Sprintscan 120?
Anyone know the availability
in the
scanner firmware, as using Vuescan still gets the dithering.
In article 6F6EA5048A46D41184AF0006295717342DC8BB@DLUKEX01,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Dillon) wrote:
Morning all,
I have a Canon 2700f. I have used it for years and come to the
conclusion
that it doesn't handle darkish
Be happy to scan a couple on a SS45 when I get back from Thailand sometime
after the 6th
David
-Original Message-
From: Johnny Deadman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 4:02 PM
To: Filmscanners
Subject: filmscanners: Can someone in Toronto do me a favour
on 03.12.00 02:00, Tony Sleep wrote:
Does this explain why my message hasn't turned up on the list?
Did you receive a bounce message? You should have.
No bounce message.
--
David Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 02.12.00 08:59, filmscanners-digest aka Tony Sleep wrote:
I also need to work out how to configure Majordomo so digest members can post
to the list.
Does this explain why my message hasn't turned up on the list?
--
David Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from Polaroid".
--
David Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to hold the film in place. Flex they will not do.
I would not be surprised to see this design eventually incorporated into
the 4000. They will be a tad or two more expensive though.
Thanks for your input
David
David;
Will this redesign of the holders delay the introduction of the SS120?
Also, will there be a holder for 35mm panoramics (24mm x 65mm) ??
Thanks!
- Original Message -
From: Hemingway, David J [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 8:05 PM
Subject
hould
have a FAQ for accessing Usenet news groups. There are literally thousands
of news groups
David
-Original Message-
From: Dana Trout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 12:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Kodak RFS 3600 (was: filmscanners: Side Step, Have
Bob,
I don't know first hand but will ask.
David
-Original Message-
From: Robert E. Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 10:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Scanning Polachrome slides
What experience is out there regarding scanning
Stewart,
Unfortunately I am not a Viewscan user. Have you tried Insight and
Insight with a raw scan.
David
-Original Message-From: Stewart Musket
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 2:55
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: filmscanners:
Scanning Problem
It's not shipping
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 11:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner
Just came back from N.Y. photoexpo. Saw the new Kodak rfs 3600 scanner.
Looks
good but
I got a glimpse of the new Polaroid 120 film scanner at Photo Plus Expo in
New York this afternoon. Here's what I gleaned from speaking with two reps:
On target for a January release in the US
Price has been set (alas) at $3,995
In response to requests from various product focus groups,
There have been two issues discovered with Silverfast and Photoshop 6.0. The
note below describe the registration issue. A solution to the color
management issue has not been resolved at this time. Will keep you posted.
Regards,
David
Here is a quick note explaining our stance with Photoshop 6
Walt,
When you select 12 bit "raw" scan you may also find it useful to check the
box below to embed the scaer profile. This embeds the profile for the
scanner and gets saves a lot of work you would have to do without it.
David
-Original Message-
From: WALTER MESS [mailto:[EMAIL
I would expect "Beta" to be posted on the web site within four weeks or
sooner. Unless the software Gods aren't smiling.
David
-Original Message-
From: Ron Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 1:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: questio
or operator
error but poor shadow performance is not indicative of the product.
I may suggest you try a raw scan into Photoshop or PolaColor Insight.
Thanks
David
-Original Message-
From: evan_anderson Last Name [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:31 PM
To: [EMAIL
Frank,
Give me a day ot two and I will take care of it for you.
David
-Original Message-
From: Frank Paris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 11:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Polaroid won't take my ss4000
I tried to get Polaroid to repair or replace my
s it would be covered by the "good as gold" 30 guarantee. They could
send you another.
David
-Original Message-
From: Frank Paris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 8:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: got my SS4000
Thanks, that's encouraging. I have subsequ
Khanh,
Because of the high quality of the ccd used in the SS4000, which produces
very little noise, multi-scanning is of little value. Although
multi-scanning is not available in Insight, Vuescan and Silverfast do
multi-scanning.
David
-Original Message-
From: Dynax N [mailto:[EMAIL
images 4x5.
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Entlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 5:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Measuring resolution (was Re: Real resolution of a 4000
dpiscanner?)
"Hemingway, David J" wrote:
God I hate to allo
limitations that are directly related to money you are also illuminated a
whole bunch of other pixels in the area. You absolutely need some pixel
overlap to get a smooth image but the lower price units have much more pixel
overlap than more expensive units.
David
-Original Message-
From
My understanding the HR 500 is a $40,000 scanner. Don't know for sure but
that's what the grapevine has said.
David
-Original Message-
From: Austin Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 8:24 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [NONE]
I take
Jim,
$10 K? Hmmm, then you will be very pleasantly surprised.
David
-Original Message-
From: Jim Karr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 3:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (No Subject)
What scans 35mm through 6x9 at 4000DPI, has a SCSI
Ralf,
It sounds like a good idea to me. That way we could see what problems
others are having. I think there may be fairly large variations in the
magnitude of the problem. The problem I encountered was much worse that
the reference posted a few weeks ago.
However, with my computer set as it
quite capable of screwing up
myself!
--
David Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The filmscanners mailing list is hosted by http://www.halftone.co.uk
To resign, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] with UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS in the
title
Geees, can't tell everything. More than a SS4000 and less than a SS45Ultra
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 3:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (No Subject)
What
Don't know but will look into it but my comments were more related to
performance spec's. I would not think that the difference between SCSI I and
II would influence anyone decision on how well the scanner works for its
intended purpose. First I have to find where we state SCSI II.
David
Also I was taking some heat her from the perception that we were not
interested in the medium format customers which was incorrect.
David
-Original Message-
From: Bob Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 6:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
From: "Hemingway, David J" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 9:07 PM
What scans 35mm through 6x9 at 4000DPI, has a SCSI and firewire
connection,
does medium format strips and will be announc
What scans 35mm through 6x9 at 4000DPI, has a SCSI and firewire connection,
does medium format strips and will be announced at Photokina
:)
The filmscanners mailing list is hosted by http://www.halftone.co.uk
To resign,
mple. The originator
of the thread though he was seeing silver grains when in fact he was not.
As I am from a manufacturer I am/was a litle apprehensive in writing this.
Hope you will not think it is "sour grapes". Give the level of control I
think you need to be very carefull in the conc
501 - 554 of 554 matches
Mail list logo
