new Nikon 9000 that does scan
Kodachrome quite effectively. However, I don't think that the Nikon
9000 meets the requirement of inexpensive. The Nikon 5000 and the
Nikon V also perform better with Kodachrome than the older models but
not as well at the 9000.
Jack Phipps
Kodak's Austi
questions, please email me.
You can go to www.asf.com to get a description of our plug-ins.
Jack Phipps
Kodak's Austin Development Center
Formerly, Applied Science Fiction
Developers of Digital ICE, Digital ROC, Digital SHO
an
on-line search, but it is hard to find one that is helpful. Any ideas
will be appreciated!
Jack Phipps
Kodak's Austin Development Center
Formally, Applied Science Fiction
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL
Hi David.
The Digital ROC and Digital GEM that are included with the scanners can only
be used at the time of the scan.
The Digital ROC plug in can be used with any digital image. There is no
Digital GEM plug in... yet.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: David
free from www.asf.com.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
, March 30, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Jack Phipps
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Digital PIC
Jack, what are the pixel dimensions of the largest image included in the
XRDN set?
Bob Shomler
>>What are the resolutions of the three versions saved to the CDR?
>>How many bits is the scan?
>
>T
can be used for enlargements well
beyond 8x10.
>Can the customer use the developed film after processing?
The XRDNs are returned to the customer (along with the JPEGs) on a CD
instead of film negatives.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
- Original Message -
From: "David Lew
scanner and has
the time to experiment, maybe they can report to the group!
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Julian Vrieslander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 9:33 PM
To: Jack Phipps
Subject: [filmscanners] Re:Using dICE with glas
2002 4:27 AM
To: Jack Phipps
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Re:Digital PIC
Jack Phipps wrote:
>
> You walk up to a kiosk and drop your exposed, undeveloped 35 mm film
> canister into our processor. The processor automatically extracts the
tongue
> (not a simple task, a first in the in
ully taken care of or just thrown in the drawer, film
will have surface defects that have to be corrected.
I know you love your Polaroid scanner. It is a great scanner. But, it will
be a better scanner with Digital ICE.
Good luck scanning.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Me
pletely. But when the light is defused by a defect, it is
amplified to restore the image.
We are working with many scanner manufacturers to include Digital ICE into
their products. Look for new models soon.
I hope this helps. BTW I fell in love with Sammy. He's a great model!
Jack Phipps
Appli
nk to some examples and more information this week.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Thomas B. Maugham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I would love to have an ICE program that works with the SS4000 and VueScan.
Does anyone have any further information about the offering
f the surface defects.
Please check out the site for additional description. I probably wasn't very
accurate when I described it as "looks through". I hope this description is
helpful.
Good luck scanning!
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Clive
Opps--
That is a film recorder...
... a rather expensive (over $10,000 used) film scanner
-Original Message-
From: Jack Phipps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:20 PM
To: Jack Phipps
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Fw: OT: Film Recorders
We (our company) has a
years
ago with a CAD (Computer Aided Design) system I managed. It gave
surprisingly good results. We used Kodak instant slide film (no longer
available since the lawsuit with Polaroid).
Good luck.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
Hi All
I've been lurking for a while, but not had a
should go on top). Then erase the top layer reveling the image below.
The Acer 2740 S is a very good, inexpensive scanner that can scan four
slides at once. That may not be much consolation when you have hundreds, but
it is an option.
Good luck.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: RE: film scanners: X-ray scanners/etc
On 11/21/01 6:01 PM, Jack Phipps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote:
>One of my friends has some business cards he had printed. Something to the
>effect that he is a special emissary to some low level government
ays.
Jack
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 5:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RE: filmscanners: X-ray scanners/etc
Jack Phipps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I just got back from NYC in early November
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: RE: film scanners: X-ray scanners/etc
Judging from your comments, the warnings Kodak and Fuji have on their
websites and Jack Phipps' nightmare with taking film on board, I believe
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jack Phipps
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 6:30 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Color Negative Film Poll
I just switched from NPH II to NPZ with good results. Before that I used
NPH, also a good choice. When there is enough light, I love
-Original Message-
From: Jack Phipps
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:30 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Color Negative Film Poll
I just switched from NPH II to NPZ with good results. Before that I used
NPH, also a good choice. When there is enoug
I just got back from NYC in early November. They would not let me have my
film hand inspected. I begged, pleaded and threatened. The only time I could
get it hand inspected was at La Guardia. I had about 15 rolls out of boxes
in a zip lock. The took each canister out and swabbed it, about 1-2 minu
I just switched from NPH II to NPZ with good results. Before that I used
NPH, also a good choice. When there is enough light, I love Reala. But
shooting a lot indoors, high speed is a must.
On trips, I always carry both, NPZ and Reala. Good luck Herb.
Jack
-Original Message-
From: Herb
site.
You decide which images go into an album and which don't (you can create an
album for each game for instance). Each album can have a password, so each
team could access their albums, but other teams couldn't.
Feel free to contact me off-list for more information.
Jack Phipps
App
bviously have a different
aspect ratio and size.
This is very subjective and I would print several different sizes and
textures, then take them to some of your favorite customers and friends and
get their opinions.
Good luck! I'm sure you will do well.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
Bruce can't post, so here are his comments. I guess an airplane is a good
application, you probably can't hear it over the roar of a window open at 80
knots!!!
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
Jack,
I sometimes use the ken-lab gyros for motion picture cameras. Be warned,
they c
grees per second and capture a steady image.
Just another idea.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Rob Geraghty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 8:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: 27
I use the same software, Nikon Scan 3.1, on my G4 Mac for a Nikon 4000 and
it works just fine.
Jack Phipps
-Original Message-
From: david/lisa soderman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Nikon 8000ED w/Macs
ghter colors in where you want them.
The real application for Digital ROC is for faded images. Check out:
http://www.asf.com/products/roc/filmROC.shtml where there is a picture of an
old car before and after Digital ROC. It is also helpful when you have
unusual lighting (tungsten or fluorescent).
Good l
mbedded dust in the
emulsion, and defects in the film) then Digital ICE will identify the defect and
attempt removal, usually with success.
Jack
Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 20, 200
images that are more "vibrant" and "alive" when I compare the
before and after.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Barbara & Martin Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 7:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscan
g the bandwidth. If we do get one, I promise I'll report back.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Austin Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 5:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ?
BTW, these tests are based on using the Epson print driver inside of
Photoshop to drive the Epson 9000, not the external RIP. Your results may
vary.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Shough, Dean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:44 AM
T
Please forgive the TOTALLY off topic post. My thoughts are with any list
members any their friends and relatives affected of the attacks in New York
City and Washington DC. I want you to know my thoughts are with you.
Jack Phipps
Good luck in your search.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: John Rylatt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:16 PM
To: filmscanners
Subject: filmscanners: Selecting a scanner
I am new to this list and would appreciate some advice on
Exciting stuff Rob! I love seeing your airplane pictures. Keep up the good
work. I probably won't see the magazine over here, but you should share a
link where we can see them on-line. Congratulations.
Jack
-Original Message-
From: Rob Geraghty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, S
hat caters to professionals, meticulously handled and STILL there are
surface defects. I also scan a lot of old images. For old poorly handled
images I wouldn't consider a scanner without Digital ICE.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Barbara & Martin Gr
60MB-- 10 sec.
11 sec.
150MB -- 15 sec.
17 sec.
375MB -- -- 30
sec.
http://www.like.ca/Durst/Sigma_page.html
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
--
ice.
Jack Phipps
-Original Message-
From: James Schenken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 7:34 PM
To: Jack Phipps
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Cleaning slides using Digital ICE
At 09:15 AM 06/18/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>I will only list the consumer products (there are
Thanks Steve. I've sent it three times to the list. I guess it was too
large. To bad I didn't think of LZW.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Steve Greenbank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 11:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
I'm using a Nikon 4000 as we speak on a Mac G4 with 8.something OS. Digital
ICE, Digital ROC and Digital GEM are working just fine.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Phelps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 11:44 AM
To: [
o 7920 by 11520
(about 274 MB). It is hard to tell the difference in the final print
(between 180 and 360 upsized). If you send the Epson anything besides a
multiple of 360 (45, 90, 180, 360, 720) like 240 or 300 you will be able to
tell subtle differences when Epson resizes (see explanation belo
small difference between the lines. On my
Epson 9000 it happens when you resize to 300, 240, and almost any odd size (like
304). It doesn't happen when you resize to 45, 90, 180 (the current size), 360
or 720.
Jack
Phipps
Applied Science
Fiction
I
think you'd be a lot happier with the Acer 2740 at a similar
price.
Jack
Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 12:58
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: filmscanners:
Canoscan
ing how it removes the
noise without blurring the film.
I'd
like to hear about your experiences too.
Jack
Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-From: Wilson, Paul
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 3:43
PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Sub
You can check our website: http://www.asf.com.
On the following page of our FAQ questions 6 and 7 answer your question
(I've listed them below).
http://www.asf.com/support/FilmICEFAQs.shtml#Q6
Q6: Which scanners are available with Digital ICE?
A6: Acer's ScanWit 2740S
Minolta'
better if some of our newsgroup members uploaded images instead of
me. If you don't, people will have to look at my images:).
Mention my name in the comments and I'll send you a luggage tag (woop-ti-do!
but we're out of tee shirts) until I run out.
Thanks in advance!
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
guessed
at earlier.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Jack Phipps
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:55 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Full Frame with the LS-2000?
Yes, I filed the black plastic on one frame of my FH-2 strip film hold
If you have the motorized SA-20 film strip holder installed, you must remove
it an insert the MA-20 Slide mount adapter. The FH-2 goes into the MA-20. I
use my modified FH-2 to get to the edge of the film (a little closer than
the SA-20).
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original
ng I need it to.
Sometimes I position the negative up or down and sacrifice one side of the
image or the other. So far (knock on wood) I haven't needed 100% of both
sides. I guess I could scan twice and paste...
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Michael Hin
there
must be something wrong with the scanner or the settings.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Dave King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: FW: Shadow detail & LS-4000
After havi
and you can do print restoration FAST and more
effectively that hours with an image editor!
It looks like a busy week here, but I hope to post some comparisons soon.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: shAf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 200
his to say, if I were choosing between a scanner with Digital ROC and Digital
GEM or a scanner without it, I would choose the one with. And if I had any faded
negatives (boy do I) it would make the decision even
easier.
Seeing
is believing.
Jack
Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
---
l, so those are
the choices you will have to make.
The newest Nikon scanners have a Kodachrome setting used correcting color
problems. It is my experience that Digital ICE does not affect color.
It is important to note that Digital ROC and Digital GEM are not affected by
the Kodachrome limitation di
Opps?
>It is important to try it on your negatives.
Since when did Kodak make Kodachrome negatives?
Sorry, I should have proofed better.
Jack
-Original Message-
From: Jack Phipps
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 11:17 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: filmscanners: Digital
the past that it doesn't work because we feel it is important not to
misrepresent our product. We'd rather say it doesn't work on Kodachrome at
all then to imply it always works.
There might be some feedback from this user community on the effectiveness
of Digital ICE on Kodachrom
elieve in and use the product. I believe it is in the interest of the
scanning community as well, that I promote Digital ICE. If I'm too excited
about it, I apologize.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Laurie Solomon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesda
>Hopefully I'll be able to remove the fingerprint with some careful
>use of the cloning tool.
Digital ICE should solve this problem for you.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Rob Geraghty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001
I saw
FARE demonstrations at PMA in February. I recommend you do a comparison between
FARE and Digital ICE before you purchase a Canon scanner.
Jack
Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-From: Chris Hargens
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 6
David--
Will you be sharing the results of your survey with the group?
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Hemingway, David J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 10:14 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: filmscanners: System conf
Another way to reduce noise is with Digital GEM.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Hemingway, David J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 1:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Polaroid 4000 dpi
A word on noise and
>hello again Jack :o)
>
> What's the deal with ICE^3 support for the new Nikon scanners only??
>If Nikon offers NS3 for the LS-2000, why not offer the full deal???
>shAf :o)
That is out of our control. I'll pass it on to Nikon though, it sounds like
a good
r than the original. The
color appears more accurate also. Try it. I think you'll like it.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
d new film
that has been painstakingly processed usually has defects), Digital ICE
removes defects you might not even see to remove with an editor. Many times
images look better after Digital ICE even though you can't identify specific
defects.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-O
Collin and Todd--
I got this informtion from one of our Acer scanner users. It may help answer
your questions.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
Jack:
- here is the information that Maury pulled together to respond to your
chat-room's comments regarding Acer 2740S performance.
- as you
I asked our webmaster to replace the converted files with the files I sent
him.
Jack
-Original Message-
From: Bill Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 4:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: File format
I just ran some experiments and
s 14,662 as an uncompressed 16 bit image. I'm
not sure why the file increased in size when I compressed it.
Your results will vary depending on the image you use. I hope this data is
useful. Your conclusions will vary depending on your needs obviously.
Good luck.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fic
Good job Tony. You've got a tough job I don't envy. Keep up the good work.
Your friend,
Jack Phipps
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 10:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: ADMIN: OT, bad te
You can run each one separately or together in any combination.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Dale & Gail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 6:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Digital ICE 3
With the new Ni
nd after comparisons were impressive.
I hope you understand our situation and will continue to consider our
products.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Michael Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I never did a get a
straight answer from Jack at ASF on why
un in "Mode: On (Sharpen)". This should solve your
problem with the sharpness.
The grain shouldn't affect function of Digital ICE.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Rob Geraghty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"John Matturri" <[EMAIL PROTEC
. There is hair or lint that is in the original record. It is still
there. Only the surface defects are corrected. We don't "guess" at what is
under the defect or color it in for surrounding pixels, we correct the
surface defect.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Me
e
you to contact your scanner manufacter. They may be able to provide our
products to you.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Michael Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
So when will you guys make your super software available to the end users? I
have a Minolta
In my biased opinion, the Nikon is the clear choice between these two
scanners.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: David Freedman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 4:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Nikon 8000
Opps! I gave a big thumbs up to the ACER 2740S not the Canon. It has a lot
of bang for the buck.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: shAf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 9:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Canon
I really like the new Acer 2740S scanner. A great scanner in the price
range.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: tflash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 1:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Canon FS2710 - any good
amplify any differences. I'll send you some example
files.
Jack Phipps
-Original Message-
From: Stan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 9:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems
Jack,
I tried this on a 50 MB
format
using 36MB or a 100% increase in size. Maybe I shouldn't have used
information?
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: shAf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 3:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: bit dept
is list. Should I do that or is there an
archive where I can post the results. I would be glad to send them to you
Julie in a separate email.
Anyway, good luck with your project.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Cooke, Julie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
(Grain Management). These tools
really make a difference in the quality of scans.
Good luck in picking a scanner!
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
>I've just been reading some Nikon literature about their new scanners, and
>I have some questions about the terminology. The ad states th
--
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jack Phipps
> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 6:48 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)
>
>
> Unless it is color. Then it would be:
>
ure).
Jack Phipps
-Original Message-
From: Austin Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 1:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)
> As for the resolution needed to equal 35mm film, I think I
> hav
ne (filed out the opening) so it now can get all the
way to the edge.
Good luck
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Robert Kehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 2:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 rea
83 matches
Mail list logo
