Why are you sending attachments to the list?
Lawrence
Hi all,
See enc. scanned from Nikon 8000 (I'm still testing it, it
certainly has potential, but it also has limitations...). I
rescanned it (without taking the film holder out, same
params, i.e., not fine mode) and the problem
Lawrence asked
Why are you sending attachments to the list?
Relax Lawrence, it's OK. Here's a quote from Tony Sleep's mailing list
instructions: Posting encoded images is permitted if they are relevant, but
please keep file sizes below 80k. Use JPEG image encoding, and MIME attachment.
The
On 11/25/01 7:29 PM, Peter Marquis-Kyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Relax Lawrence, it's OK. Here's a quote from Tony Sleep's mailing list
instructions: Posting encoded images is permitted if they are relevant, but
please keep file sizes below 80k. Use JPEG image encoding, and MIME
attachment.
So... now that we are all past this... what about the problem with the scan!
Any ideas?!
Thanks,
Asael
- Original Message -
From: Lawrence Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: filmscanners halftone.co.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon
now, because of my new Digicam. Nearly 5000
digicam pix in 3 months, drat, filmscanning is such a chore.)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Duncan
Sent: 25 September 2001 23:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon
Hi all,
anyone else out there using a Nikon SC8000 with Vuescan?
I'm having problems and Ed thinks its my system, so extra input would be
welcomed,
you can contact me off-list
Please contact onlist as well?
Paul.
I have been writing about focus problem with LS 4000 and LS2000 please keep
me out from any questions regarding the LS 8000 scanner.
Mikael Risedal
From: PAUL GRAHAM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Nikon 8000/ digital ICE, was:
The new Minolta Multi Pro is one of those machines with different
resolutions for different format.
I'd be VERY careful believing any of the dynamic range specs from that
scanner. It's probably pretty good, but I doubt it is any better than any
of the others that are 14 bits.
From what they
Thanks for your comments Paul.
Gem is another matter. did nothing for me, shame.
Digital GEM is designed to reduce noise, most commonly grain in film.
There are times when it will make a very noticeable difference, especially
in skin textures. There is one example at:
thanks for your prompt feedback Jack,
regarding ROC, I was using it on an underexposed negative, as I think you
recommended a while back. ROC worked, shockingly so, but way too much. a far
weaker setting (like two or three notches down, not just one) for such thin
negs would be great,
and then
To Jack Phipps,
The real application for Digital ROC is for faded images. Check out:
http://www.asf.com/products/roc/filmROC.shtml where there is a picture of an
old car before and after Digital ROC. It is also helpful when you have
unusual lighting (tungsten or fluorescent).
I'd appreciate a
Paul, from just where did you get yours???
I have yet to find any vendor in cyberspace who has one in stock!
I'm sure there are scores of others who also are trying to locate a unit.
I think my dealer might still have a few left. I can check with them on
Monday. Please contact me off list
Is anyone using the Nikon 8000?
How does it handle those big floppy 6x6 and 6x9 films?
Any other comment or link appreciated.
Hi. I got one the other week
good machine in general.
Paul, from just where did you get yours???
I have yet to find any vendor in cyberspace who has one in stock!
I'm
Paul, from just where did you get yours???
I have yet to find any vendor in cyberspace who has one in stock!
I'm sure there are scores of others who also are trying to locate a unit.
I think my dealer might still have a few left. I can check with them on
Monday. Please contact me off list if
Dale:
I have had my 8000 for about a month. After unpacking and setting up the
scanner I quickly determined that the 120 negative holder that comes with
the unit would not hold the negatives flat. In my opinion it is an
extremely poor design. Perhaps I didn't play with it enough to
Is anyone using the Nikon 8000?
How does it handle those big floppy 6x6 and 6x9 films?
Any other comment or link appreciated.
The 120 filmholder that comes with the scanner grips the sides of the film,
and you can tension it to flatten the film. If you films have a pronounced
curl, you'll
Chris
I got the 8000 from a company called T4 in Witney, Oxfordshire. Telephone
01993 702687. I know they had a job getting hold of it but they have great
service and are very friendly.
Regards,
Chris
Chris Parks
Image Quest 3-D
The Moos
Poffley End
Witney
Oxon
OX8 5UW
England
Tel: +44
Chris,
which company sold the 8000?
Chris
Street
www.megapixels.co.uk
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 August 2001 14:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon
8000 back from
I consider features like ICE essential for scanning C-41 negatives, as I have
never received a roll of C-41 from the lab that did not contain a forest of dust
and scratches, and it's either spend hours in Photoshop cleaning the scans, or
let ICE wash all that away.
However, I don't even use ICE
Andrea wrote:
as you can see from the post below from another mailing list,
DIGITALSILVER, bad reports are giving to the Nikon 8000 and the ICE
cleaning sw. It is really true also on some of you, or this matter
has now been fixed? I would like to know that since I would like to
consider to
Moreno wrote:
I've also had some banding issues, but if I scan 14 bit, at either 2000
or
4000 dpi, with 1x multisampling, the images are clean.
Don't shoot me, but I wonder if this is a new variant of the jaggies issue
from the earlier scanners?
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I haven't been following this thread of late, but isn't there a
setting that takes longer but DOES NOT band at all? If so, why not
just use that? Epson printers frequently band at all but the slowest
settings, so that's what I always use. This would seem like a similar
situation?
Just
Rob wonders ...
Moreno wrote:
I've also had some banding issues, but if I scan 14 bit, at either
2000
or
4000 dpi, with 1x multisampling, the images are clean.
... I wonder if this is a new variant of the jaggies issue
from the earlier scanners?
It would at least be part of the
It would at least be part of the troubleshooting effort to
determine if the same banding occurs with Vuescan(?)
Does Vuescan support the 8000?
Rumour from the Nikon reps says that NikonScan 3.2 will be out shortly. Who
know, this may help with some of the issues.
Moreno,
I can do that too but isn't it a bit like saying 'my car doesn't stall as
long as I don't use 5th gear and go over 60 miles/km per hr'? These things
should not band, period.
Lawrence Smith
*
* visit my site and participate *
* in this weeks image
I can do that too but isn't it a bit like saying 'my car doesn't stall as
long as I don't use 5th gear and go over 60 miles/km per hr'? These
things
should not band, period.
At my end, scans with the 8000 at 1x show less noise in the shadows than
some scans done with an Imacon. And I scan
://www.lwsphoto.com
**
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 9:37 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000
back from service
I would return it to the place you bought it, citing it does not work
correctly, show them the banding and Nikon will not fix it. Ask them for a
full refund (check with your credit card company, they may stand behind you
on this, since it hasn't worked correctly since day one), or that they give
Isaac Crawford wrote:
It is because there is no longer any money to be made on 35mm
equipment.
As well as on digital video cameras, computers, domestic appliances.
That's the economy of today, sadly.
Tomasz Zakrzewski
Well, by mass distributors I was referring to BH, Camera World, etc.
Most things nikon are sold at or near cost by these folks. They aren't
doing that with scanners because of what David had mentioned...
I can reasonably assure you that BH and others do not sell at cost,
whether
Moreno Polloni wrote:
I see, and how long have you been in the business? If by fair profit
you mean 0-5 percent, I guess you're right. They can make some decent
profit on gray products, but not on most Nikon USA products.
The mail order places might be able to survive on 5% if they
Anyway, this is drifting awfully OT, so I'll stop now:-)
Me too.
I forwarded Peter's questions to Henry Posner at BH (I was curious about
availability also). Henry's answers are below.
Bob
For the past few months I have been checking with BH in New York City to
inquire about the availability of the Nikon 8000. Each time I have been told
maybe in July,
curious.
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Robert Hubner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000
I forwarded Peter's questions to Henry Posner at BH (I was curious about
availability also). Henry's answers
Peter wrote:
I am still curious as the 8000 appears to be available in Europe (as does
the Nikon D1x which I also would like to buy) and in limited quantities the
US. Otherwise how could there be reviews about the device.
Yes they have the 8000 at my local photo joint. So it is
That's what I suspect, or that it uses some type of averaging process of
several rows overlapped in the single row mode.
Further, I suspect the middle CCD strip is the most insulated from
anomalies (electronic, and spill over).
Art
Rob Geraghty wrote:
Rafe wrote:
Not entirely sure what
This is sounding a lot like Epson's micro printing mode to eliminate
banding during printing. It seems it might be using the middle CCD row,
which is probably most stable of the three. As you said, it would slow
things down quick a bit.
The dense scan banding brings back memories of my HP
* overall, excellent scans, especially on 645
negatives. Quality on par with the Leaf 45,
maybe even marginally better. (Sorry, Austin.)
If I were the Leaf designer, I'd take that as a compliment! For a 12 year
old design, it does hold its own, and if I had to do it all over again, I'd
Rafe,
What are your other settings for the 5 minute scans? I find that a 16x
multisample, 14bit, ICE normal scan of a 645 transpanency takes about 20-25
mintues
Lawrence
* Fast. 645 scans w/o ICE in about 5 minutes.
(on Athlon 700 MHz machine with 512 MB RAM)
Add about 50% more
Title: RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000: An Unbiased Review
I also have an LS8000. I got it a week ago and was having the banding problem (as well as AF and various other problems). The super fine CCD mode did fix it but not I'm not having the problem even though I'm not using super fine CCD mode
Rafe wrote:
Not entirely sure what this does -- the Nikon manual says
it uses one CCD row rather than three -- but it did
completely eliminate the banding. The price is that the
scan takes three times as long (!!!)
Maybe the banding is caused by differences in the response
of the three CCD
In a message dated 4/24/2001 12:44:16 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am reliably informed that the Nikon 8000 scanner goes on sale next week in
the UK.
Price around £2600 including sales tax (17.5%)
Anyone got one in the US yet?
Is Vuescan supporting yet Ed?
I have the code in
None of my usual suppliers has any. As soon as one does.
Lawrence
I am reliably informed that the Nikon 8000 scanner goes on sale
next week in
the UK.
Price around £2600 including sales tax (17.5%)
Anyone got one in the US yet?
Is Vuescan supporting yet Ed?
pg
Can't speak for the rest of the world, but here all that's happened is
there are way too many web designers already, and that's before adding
the out of work photographers.
And the "value" and pay schedules for "web CD art" just aren't going to
be anything near what LP art paid.
Art
Gordon
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001 02:06:26 -0800 Arthur Entlich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Images in general are becoming more and more just so much "stuff" and
old stuff is being recycled.
Exactly so.
Regards
Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio exhibit; + film scanner info
Tony Sleep wrote:
And if you really want to get depressed, the next phase is e-publishing instead
of print. I think that's totally inescapable as the web becomes ubiquitous and
wireless PDA technology evolves. At that point the newsagents, printers and
distributors join us in the dole
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Wilkinson" michael@infocus-
keep smiling
"When your smiling...
when your smiling
the whole..
world..
smiles...
with-you".
Richard Corbett - the singing amateur
There was a great April Fool I read last year for a digital camera that
worked without lens or image sensor.
All it had was a compass and GPS linked to the shutter release. When the
user got home there'd be a professionally photographed version of that
scene from that angle in those lighting
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:35:49 - Dicky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Repro houses are going to get hammered again.
You swine..
I'll never forgive you for that comment.
Sorry :-) Unfortunately I see photography largely transforming to a sort of
global, copyright-free digital clip-art.
Tony wrote:
Sorry :-) Unfortunately I see photography largely transforming to a sort of
global, copyright-free digital clip-art. Any niche any of us can spot and
occupy is horridly transient, right now. The boundaries between
professional and amateur are dissolving in the process.
The lines were
Dicky wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Wilkinson" michael@infocus-
keep smiling
"When your smiling...
when your smiling
the whole..
world..
smiles...
with-you".
Richard Corbett - the singing amateur
Don't quit you day job ;-)
Art
Another comment to add to Roman's If it were true that the automation will
replace the brain, then why do professional writers make so much money when we
have word processors? These yechno auto toys are all meant to be extensions of
and not replacements for the brain... the brain is the
Dicky wrote:
Actually I have every confidence in the abilities of the man camera
manufacturers to produce the totally automated and independent self
operational camera before the next decade is out.
"What does that mean squire?" I hear you ask...
well what it means my son is that the
Mr Wilkinson PLEASE!
Everyone likes to talk futures, it's fun and what's more it costs nothing,
and what's even more, anyone can do it.
Soothsaying has been with us always and always will be with us.
Just remember...soothsayers never make money because they never guess right
often
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001 20:29:32 - Dicky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Sci-Tex from Israel being probably the best known creative workstation =
provider today although for really flashy creative work the Quantel =
Graphics Paintbox would turn a few heads and a few bank balances as well =
at
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Wilkinson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120 ??
Art is ,in my opinion ,spot on !
Drum scanners will have a limited life
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Sleep" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Repro houses are going to get hammered again.
You swine..
I'll never forgive you for that comment.
Actually I have every confidence in the abilities of the man camera
manufacturers to produce the
Ed,
Will you be getting a loner to test out Canons new scanner?
Dale
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 2/20/2001 10:07:53 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This doesn't stop manufacturers from bypassing ASF entirely
like Canon did with their latest scanners. Canon added the
In a message dated 2/21/2001 9:48:20 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Will you be getting a loner to test out Canons new scanner?
No, I don't have any contacts at Canon. I won't be able to add
support for Canon's new scanners until someone loans me one.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
- Original Message -
From: Michael Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120 ??
Jack... I thought Dolby was patented circuitry, ie: hardware... You guys
sell
software.. I
know as the
Mac and The PC... Same thing will happen with scanning... it's only just
begun.
Mike M.
Dicky wrote:
- Original Message -From: "Michael Moore"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday,
February 21, 2001 4:19 AMSubject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000
I don't think anyone will argue that for now, drum scanners have the
edge in the digital scanning arena. I also don't think many would argue
that CCD scanners are being successfully used to scan 35mm frames used
in the coffee table glossy book market, with considerable success.
For those who
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 4:19
AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or
Polaroid Sprintscan 120 ??
Richard: I have been a pro for more than 35
years, owned a lab and s
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Paris" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think this is the wrong message to send to a representative of a
filmscanner manufacturer. Amateurs most definitely want a system that
saves
time, the moreso the more they have lives outside filmscanning.
Butthey do not
- Original Message -
From: "Arthur Entlich" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm really glad you got into this with your reply, because it was
exactly what I wanted to say. At one point, I was in conversations with
Kodak concerning the possibilities of making some mural sized images
from 35mm
I agree with Mike,
I'm scanning with a SprintScan 4k because I needed the control over every
step of my production schedule. Ironically, the week I purchased it I had
just FedEx'ed 150 slides to be written to Photo CD's. The next day, when
another large job came in, it pushed me to make the
t: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:33 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120 ??
I don't know where these guys get the idea that everyone that uses a
pro-sumer
(Minolta Elite, Nikon LS2000, etc.) is an amateur... I see a lot of pros
buying
these to scan work to gi
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:33 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120 ??
I don't know where these guys get the idea that everyone that uses a
pro-sumer
]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120 ??
In researching for the SS120 we asked medium format users about features
including the various dust and scratch solutions. They said pretty much to
the person they took excellent care of their film and did not consider dust
Mike--
This is a tough question to answer. It is important that we work with our
existing customers (scanner OEMs) because it is important that they include
an infra-red channel in their scanners (according to our agreed upon
specifications). Without their help, we couldn't have the success we've
--- Original Message -
From: "Michael Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120 ??
Richard: I earn my living as a professional photographer... I do not scan
for
fun
Jack: I understand what you are saying... but why can't you make the pitch to
the scanner OEM's that their including the IR and ICE as a basic set will allow
them to have a minimal price scanner and the availability of GEM and ROC as
accessories will only make their product more attractive?
Mike
Several hundred thousand dollar fees might have something to do with it
-Original Message-
From: Quentin Bargate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 5:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120
techniques... It's the logical quantum leap of the zone system...
Mike Moore
Dicky wrote:
--- Original Message -
From: "Michael Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120 ??
ubject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120 ??
Richard: I earn my living as a professional photographer... I do not scan
for
fun... I scan because I have to have a reliable source of scans that I can
manipulate in Photoshop and be able to hand my clients a CD or
photograph
Removing dust from digitized images:
This is a quote from another poster (elsewhere - not this list, and I
don't have the author since I clipped the quote) regarding the use of
PS and the History Brush in PhotoShop:
" - - working with a 16-bit file -
1. do your initial color space conversion
: "Richard N. Moyer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 2:28 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120 ??
| Removing dust from digitized images:
| This is a quote from another poster (elsewhere - not this list, and I
|
- Original Message -
From: "Hemingway, David J" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 4:44 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120 ??
In researching for the SS120 we asked medium format users about features
If you can get a scanner with an IR channel, ICE or Vuescan seem a lot easier to
use than that description.
Gordon
"Richard N. Moyer" wrote:
Removing dust from digitized images:
This is a quote from another poster (elsewhere - not this list, and I
don't have the author since I clipped the
output levels and therefore anything that slows down output is avoided.
The amateur, on the other hand, has rarely such a need and usually likes
their equipment to embrace as many functions as possible in a single
product.
This is seen as good value for money, which I would suggest is the
: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120
??
output levels and therefore anything that slows down output is avoided.
The amateur, on the other hand, has rarely such a need and usually likes
their equipment to embrace as many functions as possible in a single
product
I don't know where these guys get the idea that everyone that uses a pro-sumer
(Minolta Elite, Nikon LS2000, etc.) is an amateur... I see a lot of pros buying
these to scan work to give clients... I've tried PhotoCD Master and Pro..
that's why I am scanning my own 35mm... To say that we don't
Isn't ICE (and GEM and ROC?) already bundled with the only scanners that
have the IR channel necessary for their use?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nik
?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120 ??
| I don't know where these guys get the idea that everyone that uses a
Dicky wrote:
It all depends on the purpose for which the scanner was purchased.
High end drum scanners such as the Hell, Dainippon or Crosfield, remove
scratches by mounting the original in a glycerine solution. Dust is removed
at the picture editing stage, post scanning.
The reason for
Hemingway
Polaroid Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Jack Phipps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 11:54 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120
??
I wouldn't consider a scanner that didn't have
So when will you guys make your super software available to the end users? I
have a Minolta Elite with DIce... Love it, but would also like to have the other
goodies...
Mike Moore
Jack Phipps wrote:
I wouldn't consider a scanner that didn't have Digital ICE. Not only that,
but the Nikon
Think of our software like Dolby(tm) for stereo equipment. You can't buy
Dolby(tm) for your stereo, you have to buy a stereo with Dolby(tm).
The software is custom designed for each scanner model and we have worked
with scanner manufacturers to deliver the software to end users. I encourage
you
Jack... I thought Dolby was patented circuitry, ie: hardware... You guys sell
software.. I think you are missing a big bet (and it has been commented upon
previously in this forum) by not making your goodies available to those of us
who are serious about filmscanning... I would hold up our
At PMA there is only one of the new medium format scanners actually
scanning, the Polaroid Sprintscan 120
:)
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 7:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: filmscanners
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:42:45 -0500 David Freedman
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So, here's the question: With prices now nearly equal, is there a
compelling reason to prefer one over the other? I'm eager to get my order
in for one of these scanners and am leaning toward the Nikon (ED glass,
The reduced price of the Polaroid does not include the Sliverfast AI, or
Binuscan drivers. Both will be included for an additional $500. I did get a
chance to make a scan with the Polaroid 120 today with Insight 5.0 and felt
it worked as smoothly as my SS4000. The full size negative scan from
Do we know yet when the Nikon 8000 ED will become available?
Are there any other new medium format scanners besides the Nikon and the
Polaroid Sprintscan 120 that I should be looking at here at PMA?
-Anne
The reduced price of the Polaroid does not include the Sliverfast AI, or
Binuscan drivers. Both will be included for an additional $500. I did get a
chance to make a scan with the Polaroid 120 today with Insight 5.0 and felt
it worked as smoothly as my SS4000. The full size negative scan from
94 matches
Mail list logo
