]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
Having said this, I believe that you can use the Premium Glossy
Paper in the
Epson 1200 printer without any of the benefits that were supposedly
unique
to it when used with the new dye based inks of the 1270/870.
Basically, the
way I
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:46:41 -0600 Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
nor do I think the print will be handled that roughly
in terms of being flexed into a tight enough arch to cause the "fracturing"
or rectilineation that you are speaking about.
They will be rolling it up to go
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Sleep
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 7:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:46:41 -0600 Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
nor do I think
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:43:09 -0600 Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I do not think the Premium Glossy Photo Paper (EPGPP) would be of any
benefit to you.
Yeah, that is the way it looked to me too :) In fact a hammer is what I need -
I've been struggling to print an image all
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 02:13:14 -0800 Arthur Entlich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
No, seriously, you might be running low on one ink,
Yup, the low ink warning light came on eventually.
Regards
Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio exhibit; + film scanner info
comparisons
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 2:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
Laurie Solomon wrote:
Hence, given the purpose that you would be using the inkjet pri
Based on the information I have gained from this list, I will scan it at Max
(2700) and then bring it to Print dpi level. The reason is that I archive at
maximum and so the file for print has to be reduced.
If I am scanning for someone else, I scvan for the use they will have. E.g. A
Power
Tony Sleep wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 02:13:14 -0800 Arthur Entlich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
No, seriously, you might be running low on one ink,
Yup, the low ink warning light came on eventually.
Of course, that was after 10 off color prints, right? Epson does well
this way,
Laurie Solomon wrote:
(Something you Brits can certainly relate to.) ;-)
Senior moment Art? You are responding to my post not Tony's; and I am not
British. I am an "ugly American" by birth and nature, who does not use
teacups even for coffee. :-)
No, no, not a senior's moment
Tony
Ive had a 5x4 film writer since 1995 and its still bashing out trannies
and negs from 35mm upwards.
Results are indeed soft compared with camera made originals but who
actually does compare them side by side?.
Ive scanned damaged originals , repaired them and then output back to
tranny for
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001 03:30:21 -0500 Dave King ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Epson Premium Quality Photo Paper. The quality with Epson oem dye
inks is quite amazing with adequate profiles. And it's widely
available. But you want to be sure to get the 3rd iteration.
I've never even seen this
ate profiles. And it's widely
available. But you want to be sure to get the 3rd iteration.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Michael Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
What is PQPP?
Mike M.
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001 22:41:48 -0700 Michael Moore ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
this guy makes well into six figures
and
he said he has trannies made from his
files...
Obviously he is doing something right!
Regards
Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio exhibit; + film
not think the Premium Glossy Photo Paper (EPGPP) would be of any
benefit to you.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Sleep
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 6:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
On Sun
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001 03:30:21 -0500 Dave King ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Epson Premium Quality Photo Paper. The quality with Epson oem dye
inks is quite amazing with adequate profiles. And it's widely
available. But you want to be sure to get the 3rd iteration.
I've never even seen
]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001 03:30:21 -0500 Dave King ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Epson Premium Quality Photo Paper. The quality with Epson oem dye
inks is quite amazing with adequate profiles. And it's widely
available. But you want
prints.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Laurie Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 7:20 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
Dave,
That is very useful information. I have seen packages of EPGPP in
the
stores with &quo
Right!
Sorry :)
- Original Message -
From: Derek Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 7:44 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
fx: rushes off to epson web sites
I think you really mean Premium Glossy Photo Paper
Message -
From: Tony Sleep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 7:35 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001 03:30:21 -0500 Dave King
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Epson Premium Quality Photo Paper. The quality with Epson
Having said this, I believe that you can use the Premium Glossy
Paper in the
Epson 1200 printer without any of the benefits that were supposedly
unique
to it when used with the new dye based inks of the 1270/870.
Basically, the
way I understand it, the paper in both the old and the new
: Saturday, March 24, 2001 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
What is PQPP?
Mike M.
Hi Tony
Try Tapestry in Frith St. Soho. They're expensive but one of the best in
London.
Richard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
What is PQPP?
Mike M.
is on back of package at bottom.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: John Hayward at Hopco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 10:36 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
Dave
How can one tell that the PQPP one buys is the 'third
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001 11:34:33 +0100 soho ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Try Tapestry in Frith St. Soho. They're expensive but one of the best in
London.
Thanks, I'll check them out.
Regards
Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio exhibit; + film scanner info
comparisons
canning and printing.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave King
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 5:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
In the US there are two ways, one, often (but not always) the
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:21:00 -0500 Larry Berman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Have you thought of getting one of the Epson printers and doing your own
prints to submit, either for repro, or at least for guides? I'm sure there
are enough knowledgeable people on this forum to give you the (OT)
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:36:55 -0500 Gordon Tassi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Rather than fight the
repro house, I would suggest you use the Noritsu place to get the print from
your
disk. However, I would try to work a deal with the lab to allow you to run
tests
on your disk to be able to
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001 17:51:26 - Dicky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
What you require is a repro house who handle Mac or PC files. If they can do
that then there can be no problem, as long as your profiles match their
profiles.
They can all *read* them, but the problem appears to be mostly
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:14:22 -0600 Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
http://www.ledet.com/margulis/ACT_postings/ACT-photographer.txt
Thanks - I could have written that myself, and often have :(
Regards
Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio exhibit; +
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:17:40 -0700 Michael Moore ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
1. Have you taken a good look at the new Olympus dye-sub printer... my local
pro
supplier has one with sample prints they made from their shots and they look
d..n
good... and they are true continuous tone, not any
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001 07:24:40 -0500 Chuck Phelps ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
(Those scans you get from
photographers arn't any good.) The printers like to scan off the Fuji
prints.
No doubt. It just seems offensively ridiculous to have to degrade things by
adding 2 extra generations just to
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:22:29 -0800 Bob Shomler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Can you find a lab to have a tranny written from your digital file?
Now that is an interesting thought - I'd not thought about filmwriters as
resolution always seems a bit soft. I'd be interested to hear from anyone
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:29:30 -0800 (PST) Bill Ross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
what about getting a Fujix process printer alone or with others
and start a side business. Price seems to be $US 12,000.
:-) I do like those Fujis. Unfortunately, Mrs Halftone would kill me, if my
bank manager
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001 22:24:05 -0800 Arthur Entlich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
the main point of
the Epson printout is that it is a proof of the potential of the file.
I missed that bit out of the story, as it was already rather long. This is
something I often do - supply an Epson print as a
Tony: FYI... in regards to getting trannies made from scans... I ran into a photog
here in Salt Lake who is in the high dollar super photo collage game... you know
the shots of earth and computers and suns and stars, etc. that get used in annual
reports and high tech ads.. this guy makes well
OK, here's a legitimate target for spite and bile, and it's decidedly ON topic.
I have said some very bad words in their direction already, as I just don't
know what to do about this.
My main use for scanning is so I can shoot col.neg. in uncontrolled conditions,
then scan it and tart it up
01 9:48 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
.
the goddam repro
houses are stuck in 1985 and have no intention of changing to accomodate
photographer-supplied scans which will rob them of their BREAD BUTTER.
Hi Tony,
Have you thought of getting one of the Epson printers and doing your own
prints to submit, either for repro, or at least for guides? I'm sure there
are enough knowledgeable people on this forum to give you the (OT) pros and
cons of creating your own proof prints.
What about LightJet
Tony: I have used a new service at my local lab which recently obtained a Noritsu
dig. printer. Instead of providing a disk, I gave them slides because I did not
realize that they would run them through a dig. machine. The prints came out
abnout 1/3 under the desired exposure but with good
uot;
http://www.ledet.com/margulis/ACT_postings/ACT-photographer.txt
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Sleep" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 8:48 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
| OK, here's a legitimate targe
Tony: As I have posted on this same subject, you know I have felt your pain... what
I would suggest checking out the following possibilities;
1. Have you taken a good look at the new Olympus dye-sub printer... my local pro
supplier has one with sample prints they made from their shots and they
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Sleep" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 2:48 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
What you require is a repro house who handle Mac or PC files. If they can do
that then there can be
... many repro houses involved in UK magazine production are
determined to hang on to scanning, and the standard contract now bundles
scanning with everything else for a fixed cost.
It has other advantages for them too: they don't need to invest or train to
cope with photographer-supplied
.. rotten light. I shot it on CN, no problem. I explained this to the
commissioning magazine and asked if they could cope with dig. They
said yes, I shot it... and then they changed their minds and asked
for prints. I got a bunch of prints done by my lab, and
01 9:48 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
So the next question is : where can I get really good R-type or similar
prints
made from digital files, in London, often overnight? I'm not happy with my
own
Epson 1200 output (good though it is, there are spectral anomalies, a
Dan Margulis has a mailing list called Color Theory at Egroups with
interesting threads on this topic, but I doubt it will help solve the
problem. Time will do that, as the trend is inevitable with digital
capture coming like a freight train.
Meanwhile the question is what's the best repro
Tony Sleep wrote:
So the next question is : where can I get really good R-type or similar
prints
made from digital files, in London, often overnight? I'm not happy with my own
Epson 1200 output (good though it is, there are spectral anomalies, and I don't
know if the dither pattern will
What is PQPP?
Mike M.
Dave King wrote:
Dan Margulis has a mailing list called Color Theory at Egroups with
interesting threads on this topic, but I doubt it will help solve the
problem. Time will do that, as the trend is inevitable with digital
capture coming like a freight train.
"Michael Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is PQPP?
Premium Quality Photo Paper. I've mostly seen it referred to as EPGPP;
Epson Premium Glossy Photo paper.
It was mainly designed for use with the 1270.
Rob
FYI: I use Kodak's Glossy Paper on my Epson 740, set it to Photo Glossy
Film or somthing like that, anyway it gives great results that are hard to
tell from a photo print, plus the Kodak paper has the weight of a real
silver print..
Mike M.
Rob Geraghty wrote:
"Michael Moore" [EMAIL
Tony,
I, luckily, in more recent years, have had less and less dealings with
commercial printers. When I was president of Alpine Graphics (a US
poster company) in the mid seventies, we had two printers, one in
Boulder, Colorado, where the company was located, and one in Milwaukee
Wisconsin
Digital files supplied to clients can indeed cause big problems but no
more than supplying trannies!
Over the years Ive had quite a few discussions with my clients on "why
is this brochure so poor ?"
We've sat their face to face and looked at the beautiful 5x4 trannies
and I ve had to convince
53 matches
Mail list logo
