How do you get 48 bit scans out of the SS4000. I am under the impression
that only 36 bit scans are available using the supplied soft ware--Pola
Color.
48bits=3 x 16bit, and your 12bit/channel data gets padded to 16bits when creating a
raw scan in Insight.
I have the Binuscan for SS4000
Didn't anyone besides Ed Hamrick get my rather long description of how I
"faked" a Universal Holder using my MF holder and some sheet plastic with
holes cut in it?
It certainly appeared on the list. It could probably use a web page, with
explanatory diagrams or photos.
Regards
Tony Sleep
I'm planning to buy a new scanner, my old one is a Nikon LS20.
Can anyone tell me what is the best choice, the Nikon LS30 or =
CanoScan2710?
You seem to have posted this several times, and to have received responses.
BTW, please turn off HTML posting in your mail client.
Regards
Tony
Sounds like someone that knows everything has put themselves in charge of the
list
If you mean me, the arrogant SOB who cops for the bills, I certainly don't know
everything and have learned a lot from others on this list.
the rest that dot know to much can just go pound salt.
See that
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Tony Sleep wrote:
Linux,
VueScan and GIMP...
I have recently been playing in a doltish, half-compehending fashion,
with Linux and GIMP. It's a pretty impressive program and the UI is
often better than PS5 (which I use otherwise, on PC), but there seems
to be no
In the netherlands they still sell this upgrade for NLG 1340.00 ex vat = $
536 american dollars. Dutch version upgrade would be NLG 1740 = $ 696
Adobe products are way overpriced here, their sales managers dont seem to
realize they are loosing clients, and making the company seem a greedy
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Rob Geraghty wrote:
I'd be interested in trying GIMP - it might give me a reason to keep my
second hard drive and install Linux on it. But only if I can find a driver
for the Stylus 700 and an X engine for the TNT2 card.
Gimp-print will drive the 700 and there is an X
In what term of time we might see a new filmstrip holder for the ss4000 ?
I was one of those who wrote you about the feeding problem in the ss 4000.
I had the strong suspicion that it was originated by the too flexible
filmholder and suggested a more stable metalic construction. I am happy for
Great news. I've got the money aside to purchase a SS120 as soon as they
are available.
Lawrence
http://www.lwsphoto.com
Michael More wrote:
Does anyone have experience and comments on
using a Minolta San Elite for scanning Fuji Reala
negs? Would like to know if VueScan will give me
any advantages over the Minolta software.
I haven't scanned many negs on my Elite (I mainly use slides) but I
have noticed that
Frank...
ColorCal and/or PhotoCal do not need Photoshop... Profiler RGB does however.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Paris" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 13:51
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Upgrading to Photoshop 6.0 from LE
There seems
Felipe wrote:
Once I wrote asking for fast and high-quality print methos and someone
advided me to see Noritsu Digital Minilabs.
Well, I bought one QSS-2701 station from Japan. In fact, it was the second
of its kind in Latin America :)
I don't know if it was me, but I usually get my files
At 06:52 AM 11/21/00 +, you wrote:
If you could consider an alternative windows program, you should try
Picture Window. SNIP
This is a superb, competent and stable program, little known but much
recommended. SNIP
I was using the Beta 3.0 also, and it is in my opinion the best Photo
Hi Tony,
I'm not aware any problem sending mail more then once and do not know where
to solve this, if nessecary may be you can help.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: Tony Sleep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 3:07 AM
Subject: Re:
Test film scanner and digital cameras Nov. 2000
A college photographer and me have tested 5 different digital
cameras against a Nikon LS 2000 scanner. Looking at sharpness.
Fujipix S1. Nikon D1. Canon D30 Olypus E10. Nikon 990
Reference pictures were taken by Nikon F100 and different
Well all this annoying introduction is to say that I am looking for high
capacity-high quality film scanners to uncut 35mm strips.
I would like to know if there is anything other than Pakon, which so far
is the only thing I found.
Both Sony and Konica make such an item.
There may be others
Hello list members
There is a gentleman here in this list uses the SS35+
to scan MF film (6x45 and 6x6). He modified the
negative holder and adjusted the focus distance of the
lens. The SS35+ can scan 3.5x3.5 frame in one pass.
-Khanh
--- Clark Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, people!
Hi!
I use GIMP for daily image manipulation. Unfortunately I can't say anything
about color management. I did some experiments with SCARSE, which seems to give
reasonable color, and some artifacts. I think that Adobe RGB may be the best
choice to use with GIMP.
Vuescan is nice, although it has
Maybe someone already mentioned it: GIMP is available in a Windows version aswell. I
have not used it much, but my son who does a lot of picture manipulation - on a very
low budget - finds it quite good!
Ingemar Lindahl
- Original Message -
From: Jim Linch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I just released VueScan 6.3.12 for Windows, Linux, and
Mac OS. It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 6.3.12:
* Added support for 2500 dpi Microtek/AGFA scanners
* Improved film color correction for SprintScan 4000,
PhotoSmart S20, Acer
Yes I mentioned it earlier, and it is kind of a neat program. Here is the
link for anyone who is interested.
http://user.sgic.fi/~tml/gimp/win32/index-19991118.html
The only real problem I had after installing it was a file association one,
BMP files defaulted to Gimp originally. It has been
Rob Frank... I made a small error.
The two monitor profiling packages offered by ColorVision/ColorCal are OptiCal (Not
ColorCal) and PhotoCal. Both use the same Spyder.
PhotoCal is very adequate for calibrating any one monitor for either PC or MAC. It
gives
you a choice of either of two
David,
My empression is that Polachrome is for slide projection and no good for
enlargement or scanning.
The RGB filter in front of the panchromatic layer must limit the resolution
to unacceptable levels for enlargement or scanning?
This is acceptable. I just want to confirm that is the case.
I think this type of feedback is very useful and should be helpful for
people evaluating different units. I'm glad to hear it is something you
will be incorporating into your web site. I hope you don't plan on
getting any commercial sponsorship from any of those companies ;-)(I
think that
Rob Geraghty wrote:
Edwin wrote:
Offer valid in the U.S.and Canada now through 12/31/00.
I wonder why so many US software companies limit their offers geographically?
Granted a large part of their market may be in north America, but don't
they realise that by giving the rest of the
Errr, who, or what, is Timo, BTW?
I don't think you really want to know who he is accept that you should take
his recommendations and arguments with a grain of salt.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of photoscientia
Sent: Tuesday, November
26 matches
Mail list logo
