Re: [Finale] Do house styles override what composer wrote?

2003-05-28 Thread Daniel Dorff
I can answer on behalf of Presser, including Elkan-Vogel, Merion, and affiliates Coronet Press and Tritone-Tenuto. Our house philosophy is to follow evolved standards which seem to be most transparent and automatic for performing musicians to play from; ironically for engravers, the best notation

Re: [Finale] Alternate Bass

2003-05-28 Thread Richard Huggins
That's just the point. YOUR experience, not mine. And to put it another way, YOUR market, not mine. ("Every player I know...") I disagree with your evaluation of the impropriety of using vertical chord symbols to mean alternate bass. But I am unlikely ever to produce charts that you or the music ma

Re: [Finale] Checking accidentals

2003-05-28 Thread gj.berg
Thanx there Philip. It's a good tip to know about that feature in Canonic Ut's -- never noticed it before. Obviously neither solution avoids the voiding of cautionary accidentals so all past Finale work has this permanent labour involved (that is perusing each part for these particular types o

[Finale] CFC: MUSICNETWORK Open Workshop Call, Leeds, UK, September 2003

2003-05-28 Thread musicnetwork
As promised to most of you, we are trying to organise the Second Open workshop of MUSICNETWORK Thematic Network of the European Commission. A service to put together industrial and research communities. http://www.interactivemusicnetwork.org I hope that you can contribute with your valuable ac

Re: [Finale] Double-dotted notes

2003-05-28 Thread Philip M. Aker
On Sun, 25 May 2003, Mark D. Lew wrote: > I'm curious to know which terminology is used in Canada. Does it match the United > States or Britain? We use half, quarter, etc., but will stoop to crotchets if obliged to work with visitors who subscribe to arcane nomenclatures. Philip Aker http://w

Re: [Finale] Changing key sigs without courtesy naturals - a good idea?

2003-05-28 Thread Robert Patterson
> -Original Message- > From: James O'Briant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > But I stand firmly against notation "gimmicks" for purposes of style or > engraving aesthetics or the like. What composers do is one thing, but what engravers do is another. One can argue about the pros and cons o

[Finale] Odd key signatures.

2003-05-28 Thread Michael Edwards
[Keith:] >I once had a book of instumental exercises for trombone, with key sigs which >had me stumped for a while- (I was only a teenager!) For instance, one >actual printed key sig was EbAb Bnat! Turned out to be C minor. Also Bb, Eb, >F#, (G minor), Bb, Ab, Db, Enat. (Fminor) and the first one

Re: [Finale] Accidentals and Key Changes

2003-05-28 Thread YATESLAWRENCE
In a message dated 28/05/2003 05:47:37 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: in matters where an old practice and a new one are equally clear, I often prefer the older or more traditional method. I'm sorry, I don't find the two methods equally clear. I find the new method of not naturaliz