[Richard Huggins:]
>Due to the use of 8va in the earlier case but not in the
>latter, the second occurance would be played at a different point on the
>keys. Because of this, is there any precedent for repeating the accidentals
>on the second occurance?
I've seen it both ways, but repeating
I can't think of a specific example, but I'm almost certain I've seen a
repeated accidental after a shift to/from 8va. Probably where the
second occurence was an upbeat to a new phrase. IMO, not to give a new
accidental when the visual position of the note has changed would be a
confusing app
I would advise leaving the second accidental, since it is in a different
octave to remove any doubt.
Richard Huggins wrote:
I'm doing a piano score. I have a situation where the displayed notation on
beat 4 is identical to beat 1 in the same measure, notes which have
accidentals. Due to the use
I'm doing a piano score. I have a situation where the displayed notation on
beat 4 is identical to beat 1 in the same measure, notes which have
accidentals. Due to the use of 8va in the earlier case but not in the
latter, the second occurance would be played at a different point on the
keys. Becau
