On 16.07.2002 15:09 Uhr, Bob Clifton wrote
> The beams for a group of four sixteenth notes in Layer Two are partially
> obscuring the notehead for an eighth note in Layer One. I thought, well
> I'll just nudge the beam(s) up or down a little and that will fix it
> (though I'd never encountered t
At 11:15 AM 7/16/02 -0400, Charles Small wrote:
>Bob Clifton wrote:
> >
> > The beams for a group of four sixteenth notes in Layer Two are partially
> > obscuring the notehead for an eighth note in Layer One. I thought, well
> > I'll just nudge the beam(s) up or down a little and that will fix i
Bob Clifton wrote:
>
> The beams for a group of four sixteenth notes in Layer Two are partially
> obscuring the notehead for an eighth note in Layer One. I thought, well
> I'll just nudge the beam(s) up or down a little and that will fix it
> (though I'd never encountered the problem before). I
> De : Bob Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I finally resorted to a very klutzy way to get the score at least to look
> right (though it doesn't play back correctly). I added an extra pitch to
> one of the sixteenth notes, higher than the actual one, which forced the
> beam(s) up and out of the way
I ran across a beaming problem that has me stumped. I've used Finale off
and on for some time, but am by no means an expert (and am a newcomer on
this list). I keep thinking the solution is staring me in the face, but so
far I can't see it. Here's the problem:
The beams for a group of four
