Hi,
Should be okay; I'm using F2k3a with a Midisport 2x2 (on an iMacG3/400)
in the classic environment of Panther, with no problems at all.
Klaas de Jong.
Op 15-mrt-04 om 21:40 heeft [EMAIL PROTECTED] het volgende geschreven:
I'm seriously considering getting a Mac G4 Powerbook laptop, and want
On 15 Mar 2004, at 03:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seriously considering getting a Mac G4 Powerbook laptop, and want
to make sure I won't have any problems running FinMac 2003 on it in
Classic.
Martin,
No more problems than you would have with another other Mac.
The main issue with Clas
I'm seriously considering getting a Mac G4 Powerbook laptop, and want to
make sure I won't have any problems running FinMac 2003 on it in Classic.
Thanks.
Martin
Martin Banner
Monticello, NY
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.s
I just upgraded my Mac G4 to OSX, and am having trouble using internal
playback when running FinMac 2003 in Classic mode (external playback
through my MIDI interface/synthesizer works perfectly). For internal
speakers, when I hit play, I get a faint sound AND, more distressingly,
no rhythmic va
Is it possible, using the Mass Mover tool utility to freeze stems up or
down, to keep the original ties (I don't want them to flip when I freeze
stems)?
Thanks,
Martin
Martin Banner
Monticello, New York
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
On 23.09.2003 15:53 Uhr, Michael Cook wrote
> You'll need to turn auto music spacing off. Grace note spacing in
> Finale doesn't work as it should. Even if you set the music spacing
> options (in document options) to "Manual Spacing: Ignore", Finale
> still re-spaces the grace notes when music spa
You'll need to turn auto music spacing off. Grace note spacing in
Finale doesn't work as it should. Even if you set the music spacing
options (in document options) to "Manual Spacing: Ignore", Finale
still re-spaces the grace notes when music spacing is applied. So
once you've manually moved gr
On 23.09.2003 1:06 Uhr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
> Using Finale 2003 on a Mac, I find that grace notes are often too far
> away from the notes they precede. HOWEVER...after I use special tools to
> nudge these grace notes to the right, closer to the regular value notes,
> I often find that, after I
Using Finale 2003 on a Mac, I find that grace notes are often too far
away from the notes they precede. HOWEVER...after I use special tools to
nudge these grace notes to the right, closer to the regular value notes,
I often find that, after I close down the file and re-open, the grace
notes are
On Tuesday, July 8, 2003, at 08:38 PM, David Froom wrote:
Hello,
I'm hoping I can get some help here. I run Finale 2003 on a Powerbook
400mhz and 10.2.6. I use a UM-1 MIDI interface. I cannot get Finale
when
running in Classic to find the UM-1.
David,
You probably don't want to hear this, but
Hello,
I'm hoping I can get some help here. I run Finale 2003 on a Powerbook
400mhz and 10.2.6. I use a UM-1 MIDI interface. I cannot get Finale when
running in Classic to find the UM-1.
The UM-1 shows up fine and works like a champ with my OSX native programs
(DP 4 and Reason). It also works f
on 1/18/03 6:38 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've been noticing that, after nudging my grace notes to the right to be
> immediately before the larger note, they manage to creep back to the left
> again after saving, quitting, and then re-opening the file. It seems like
> the
I've been noticing that, after nudging my grace notes to the right to be
immediately before the larger note, they manage to creep back to the left
again after saving, quitting, and then re-opening the file. It seems like
the grace notes have a mind of their own and want to keep moving back to
the l
Generally speaking, Mac Finale and Virtual Memory are not happy campers.
I just put up two different answers about this on my plugin FAQ (1.5 and
1.6). Basically pre-OS9 users are screwed one way and post-OS9 users are
screwed another.
--
Robert Patterson
http://RobertGPatterson.com
___
i run system 8.6 on a mac G3...does it matter if I keep virtual memory
turned on while I run FinMac 2003? any adverse effects?
thanks,
martin
Martin Banner
Monticello, New York
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.s
>
>
>> ...every once in a while, the plug in
>> skips a couple of spots throughout
>> the score where a word extension should
>
Actually Tobias, I get this problem all the time with Mac 2002. If I select more than
one stave and run the plug-in I get eratic extensions on the lower staves (or no
At 8:20 PM -0400 9/23/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I ran the word extension plug-in in a 2003 file, on a Mac G4, OS 8.6. It
>works great...EXCEPT...
>
>...every once in a while, the plug in skips a couple of spots throughout
>the score where a word extension should appear. Anyone else have this
>
> ...every once in a while, the plug in
> skips a couple of spots throughout
> the score where a word extension should
Can you send me a file where this happens?
Cheers,
Tobias
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/l
I ran the word extension plug-in in a 2003 file, on a Mac G4, OS 8.6. It
works great...EXCEPT...
...every once in a while, the plug in skips a couple of spots throughout
the score where a word extension should appear. Anyone else have this
happen? Any fixes, or explanations?
Thanks in advance.
> To
> my astonishment, the print size output from my printer is much smaller
> using 2003 than using 3.7.2.
This could have to do with the fact that there are three independant levels
or ways to resize music:
(1) Page size
(2) Staff *system* size
(3) Staff size.
Are you checking all three?
Does FinMac 2003 finally address the issue of adding hyphens between
syllables over onto a new system, or do I need to continue to add a phantom
hyphen (option-space-hyphen) to accomplish this?
Martin
Martin Banner
Monticello, New York
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For years I have been using FinMac 3.7.2, and am used to a consistant size
printout of my scores.
I have finally moved into the new century and started using FinMac 2003. To
my astonishment, the print size output from my printer is much smaller
using 2003 than using 3.7.2.
In fact, a 90% resized
Jerry:
OK, one more time -- why do I not want to buy this version?
John:
Because Coda dropped the ball and it will not run on OS X.
Me:
That's OK with me. My computer (1999-era PowerBook G3) won't run (well)
on OS X either!
ng
___
Finale mailing lis
I admit it isn't much of a bright spot, but at least since you are using
the program professionally the upgrade is a tax-deduction so it isn't a
total loss.
I have been fortunate in that the OS that I use has remained
consistently behind the major changes on the Windows side so I have
missed
Having purchased every upgrade since 1.0, I sure wish I could skip
this one because of it's lack of OSX support. But alas, I have a FinWin
2003 file from a client to work on, so Coda is forcing me to upgrade
if I want to continue working.
Harold
On Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:59 PM, John Howell <
>OK, one more time -- why do I not want to buy this version?
>
>Jerry
Because Coda dropped the ball and it will not run on OS X.
John
John & Susie Howell
Virginia Tech Department of Music
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411 Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, one more time -- why do I not want to buy this version?
Jerry
Éric Dussault wrote:
> FinMac 2003 is now ready to ship!
> see coda's site.
>
> Eric
>
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
__
FinMac 2003 is now ready to ship!
see coda's site.
Eric
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
28 matches
Mail list logo
