Most of the whitelist messages I get come from
[EMAIL PROTECTED], since they are trying to hide their e-mail
address.
So the message would simply get bounced back and refused since that
@whitelistservice.com address isn't subscribed.
So we'd NEVER see the stupid things.
David H. Bailey
Bra
On 01.03.2004 22:14 Uhr, Brad Beyenhof wrote
> But this, IMO, would be worse. If the Reply-to were set to the list,
> the whitelist "request" would have been sent *to the list*, for *every*
> post. What's more, all of those replies would get archived and
> uselessly clog up the shsu.edu server.
On 1 Mar 2004 at 13:14, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
> On Monday, March 1, 2004, at 12:08 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
>
> > The only thing that may help to avoid such dilemmas in the future is
> > to include a reply to address in list messages. I think this has
> > been asked for many times (and all oth
On Monday, March 1, 2004, at 01:33 PM, d. collins wrote:
Brad Beyenhof écrit:
But this, IMO, would be worse. If the Reply-to were set to the list,
the whitelist "request" would have been sent *to the list*, for
*every* post. What's more, all of those replies would get archived
and uselessly
On Monday, March 1, 2004, at 12:08 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 01.03.2004 20:16 Uhr, Henry Howey wrote
I did not see the Whitemail notices to the list as they were sent by
a listmember. I will check with IT folks here to see if another
filter is possible. I currently monitor only the DIGEST s
On 01.03.2004 20:16 Uhr, Henry Howey wrote
> I did not see the Whitemail notices to the list as they were sent by
> a listmember. I will check with IT folks here to see if another
> filter is possible. I currently monitor only the DIGEST so I seem to
> have escaped the blizzard;-)
>
> If anyone h
I did not see the Whitemail notices to the list as they were sent by
a listmember. I will check with IT folks here to see if another
filter is possible. I currently monitor only the DIGEST so I seem to
have escaped the blizzard;-)
If anyone has a suggested filter I could propose to IT, please n
On 19.04.2002 8:17 Uhr, Michael Cook wrote
> Henry Howey sent this message a few days ago, telling us that a Reply
> To header had been added to the messages. Now the Reply To header has
> disappeared: this means that if I hit "Reply" on my mail program, I
> send a message to the person who sent
Henry Howey sent this message a few days ago, telling us that a Reply
To header had been added to the messages. Now the Reply To header has
disappeared: this means that if I hit "Reply" on my mail program, I
send a message to the person who sent the original message, not to
the list. Any chanc
ve I missed something!
Regards, Keith in OZ
- Original Message -
From: Henry Howey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 1:51 AM
Subject: [Finale] From your friendly list owner;-)
> As you have all noticed this morning, we have new software
At 10:51 AM -0500 4/16/02, Henry Howey wrote:
>As you have all noticed this morning, we have new software running
>out list. The parameters are really broad, and I must ask your
>patience and input as I (even more than all of you) learn how to
>tweak this to serve us all better. Particularly, I
At 04/16/2002 11:51 AM, Henry Howey wrote:
>As you have all noticed this morning, we have new software running
>out list. The parameters are really broad, and I must ask your
>patience and input as I (even more than all of you) learn how to
>tweak this to serve us all better. Particularly,
As you have all noticed this morning, we have new software running
out list. The parameters are really broad, and I must ask your
patience and input as I (even more than all of you) learn how to
tweak this to serve us all better. Particularly, I hope that the new
ARCHIVE feature will be usef
13 matches
Mail list logo
