At 1:02 PM 06/09/03, David H. Bailey wrote:
>And they don't come up with a list of reasons not to buy finale, because
>by and large there don't seem to be many people who are primarily
>computer-engravers, but more composers who aren't interested in the
>minutiae of page layout and item alignment
At 7:57 AM 06/09/03, David H. Bailey wrote:
>To be fair, Sibelius (version 2.1 -- I don't know about earlier
>versions) will show you the exact measurement from a reference point
>that you are moving something. And it shows that while you are moving
>it, so if you are moving something vertically
On 9 Jun 2003 at 7:57, David H. Bailey wrote:
> To be fair, Sibelius (version 2.1 -- I don't know about earlier
> versions) will show you the exact measurement from a reference point
> that you are moving something. And it shows that while you are moving
> it, so if you are moving something ve
At 7:55 PM 06/08/03, Dan Carno wrote:
>What version of Sibelius are you guys talking about? For example,
>articulations can be easily grabbed & moved *vertically*. Sibelius does
>not let you move them horizontally from their centered position, but why
>would you want to?
Well, for one thing, de
Actually, on the Sibelius list there are very few references to Finale,
and those that do crop up are pretty much the same-old "huge learning
curve" complaints.
Nobody has claimed that Sibelius does anything better than Finale.
And they don't come up with a list of reasons not to buy finale, be
At 6:28 PM +0200 6/09/03, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 09.06.2003 13:53 Uhr, David H. Bailey wrote
To be fair, there is an independent Sibelius yahoogroup which is very
similar to this Finale community.
I am curious: do they also have a list of XX reasons not to buy Finale, and
do they point out t
What version of Sibelius are you guys talking about? For example,
articulations can be easily grabbed & moved *vertically*. Sibelius
does not let you move them horizontally from their centered
position, but why would you want to?
Daniel Carno
Trill on a note in the middle of a chord.
--
Andr
On 09.06.2003 13:53 Uhr, David H. Bailey wrote
> To be fair, there is an independent Sibelius yahoogroup which is very
> similar to this Finale community.
I am curious: do they also have a list of XX reasons not to buy Finale, and
do they point out the shortcomings of Finale from time to time? Wh
At 7:55 PM -0400 6/08/03, Dan Carno wrote:
Hi gang!
What version of Sibelius are you guys talking about? For example,
articulations can be easily grabbed & moved *vertically*. Sibelius
does not let you move them horizontally from their centered
position, but why would you want to?
Scoops, fal
ved
professionalism of the engraving.
Finale wins again.
-
Brad Beyenhof
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darcy James Argue
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Finale] Sibelius (was: New F
To be fair, there is an independent Sibelius yahoogroup which is very
similar to this Finale community. And it is inhabited by a
representative of Sibelius, who is very helpful in answering questions,
although quite often the answer is simply a reference to what page in
the manual to look at f
Dan Carno wrote:
Hi gang!
What version of Sibelius are you guys talking about? For example,
articulations can be easily grabbed & moved *vertically*. Sibelius does
not let you move them horizontally from their centered position, but why
would you want to?
This comes up a lot on the Finale l
I've been thrashing around trying to get a colleague to use Finale.
She's switching from ...ugh... Encore, which is smart; but switching
TO Sibelius, which I consider incredibly dumb. Can someone post me
the original gazillion reasons for not switching to Encore? I missed
it in my own switch
Has anyone mentioned the non-transposing chord symbols? Let me explain:
I have an adjunct colleague who teaches Computer Apps. in Music for me,
along with Jazz and some other things. We use Finale at the
University, but he switched to Sibelius when it first came available,
and constantly tell
, 2003 2:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Finale] Sibelius (was: New Finale release)
>
>
>
> On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 03:46 PM, Jonathan Smith wrote:
>
> > 21. In part extracts of Multi Wind parts you will loose the
> > transpositions for each i
To me there's an easier test to apply:
If it were 1:30 a.m. and you were on deadline for the next morning and you
couldn't afford to encounter something you HAD to do but could find no WAY
to do, which program would you want to be working with?
I don't work with Sibelius, but that notwithstanding
On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 07:55 PM, Dan Carno wrote:
What version of Sibelius are you guys talking about?
My experience is mainly with v1.4 and Windows NT. I understand there
have been some significant improvements since then. For instance I
notice that, as of 2.1, you can now move ending b
At 07:55 PM 6/8/2003 -0400, Dan Carno wrote:
Hi gang!
What version of Sibelius are you guys talking about? For example,
articulations can be easily grabbed & moved *vertically*. Sibelius does
not let you move them horizontally from their centered position, but why
would you want to?
I don't k
Hi gang!
What version of Sibelius are you guys talking about? For example,
articulations can be easily grabbed & moved *vertically*. Sibelius does
not let you move them horizontally from their centered position, but why
would you want to?
BTW, in my Sibelius manual (Version 2), articulations
On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 03:46 PM, Jonathan Smith wrote:
21. In part extracts of Multi Wind parts you will loose the
transpositions for each instrument change.
Oooh. Yes, I forgot about that. That's a deal-breaker right there,
especially for jazz arranging students.
24. So you want to mov
20 matches
Mail list logo
