Re: [Finale] Smart Slurs - Engraver Slurs

On 09.01.2006 Andrew Stiller wrote: > -- Is there a consensus on this list that engraver slurs should be used? > Absolutely not! Engraver slurs need just as much tweaking as regular slurs in order to look right, and IMO the old slurs are more easily adjusted. I instruct everyone who publi

[Finale] Bug Report: Blank Notation Tuplet Bug

Applying blank notation to a group of beamed (unbracketed) tuplets causes tuplet brackets to appear. FinMac2006c. - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/djargon Brooklyn, NY ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shs

Re: [Finale] error when saving

tim-cates / 2006/01/08 / 11:42 PM wrote: >hey guys and gals! need some help - any clues on a -5000 error when >trying to save? (Fin2005b/mac os 10.3.9) - have also noticed (and >deleted) a temporary save file on my desktop couldn't find anything >using search on the Finale support site - TI

[Finale] error when saving

hey guys and gals! need some help - any clues on a -5000 error when trying to save? (Fin2005b/mac os 10.3.9) - have also noticed (and deleted) a temporary save file on my desktop couldn't find anything using search on the Finale support site - TIA Tim _

Re: [Finale] Smart Slurs - Engraver Slurs

> > Contra Don and Andrew, I find Engraver Slurs much better-looking by > default and much easier to tweak. It's true that unedited Engraver > Slurs can be somewhat buggy (occasionally getting very tall for no > reason), but this can be avoided by nudging them all by one pixel and > then nudging t

Re: [Finale] Smart Slurs - Engraver Slurs

Contra Don and Andrew, I find Engraver Slurs much better-looking by default and much easier to tweak. It's true that unedited Engraver Slurs can be somewhat buggy (occasionally getting very tall for no reason), but this can be avoided by nudging them all by one pixel and then nudging them b

Re: [Finale] Smart Slurs - Engraver Slurs

>> -- Is there a consensus on this list that engraver slurs should be >> used? >> >Absolutely not! Engraver slurs need just as much tweaking as regular >slurs in order to look right, and IMO the old slurs are more easily >adjusted. I instruct everyone who publishes with me to turn off >engrave

Re: [Finale] Re: RTFM, no. It shouldn't be, necessary.

Owain Sutton / 2006/01/08 / 03:40 PM wrote: >And I vaguely remember hearing that >one requirement is that all functionality is available through keyboard >commands alone, so that any peripheral that can create keyboard commands >can be used. This is true, written in MS GUI Guideline loud and c

Re: [Finale] Smart Slurs - Engraver Slurs

I feel this way too and always work with engraver slurs off. I've seen so many people having trouble with it that I feel good with this decision. The engraver slurs need need tweaking anyway. And since articulations can be taken into consideration in the placement I still get some benefits too. But

Re: [Finale] Smart Slurs - Engraver Slurs

On Jan 7, 2006, at 4:10 PM, Don Hart wrote: -- Is there a consensus on this list that engraver slurs should be used? Absolutely not! Engraver slurs need just as much tweaking as regular slurs in order to look right, and IMO the old slurs are more easily adjusted. I instruct everyone

Re: [Finale] Solo Oboe

On 1/8/06, Richard Yates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Does anyone else feel that the solo oboe in Finale's Garritan has >> intonation problems? > > Maybe the rest of the Garritan orchestra should tune to the oboe > that's how it works in real life isn't it? Q: How do you make an oboist play A fla

Re: [Finale] Re: RTFM, no. It shouldn't be, necessary.

On 8 Jan 2006 at 20:40, Owain Sutton wrote: > David W. Fenton wrote: > > On 7 Jan 2006 at 22:30, Aaron Sherber wrote: > > > >>At 10:19 PM 1/7/2006, David W. Fenton wrote: > >> >On 7 Jan 2006 at 19:40, Aaron Sherber wrote: > >> >> Hmm, not sure what you mean here. The WinFin toolbar *is* > >> >> c

Re: [Finale] Solo Oboe

I've been playing back a full band score of something I've just written, and yes, there are intonation problems, esp. in full, loud chords. I'm not sure it's the oboe, but they certainly are there. Dean On Jan 8, 2006, at 11:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone else feel that the sol

Re: [Finale] Re: RTFM, no. It shouldn't be, necessary.

David W. Fenton wrote: On 7 Jan 2006 at 22:30, Aaron Sherber wrote: At 10:19 PM 1/7/2006, David W. Fenton wrote: >On 7 Jan 2006 at 19:40, Aaron Sherber wrote: >> Hmm, not sure what you mean here. The WinFin toolbar *is* >> customizable -- we just don't have an equivalent to the Cmd-Click >>

Re: [Finale] Re: RTFM, no. It shouldn't be, necessary.

On 7 Jan 2006 at 22:30, Aaron Sherber wrote: > At 10:19 PM 1/7/2006, David W. Fenton wrote: > >On 7 Jan 2006 at 19:40, Aaron Sherber wrote: > >> Hmm, not sure what you mean here. The WinFin toolbar *is* > >> customizable -- we just don't have an equivalent to the Cmd-Click > >> master access y

Re: [Finale] Solo Oboe

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone else feel that the solo oboe in Finale's Garritan has intonation problems? Maybe they're trying to make it sound more real? ;> cd -- http://www.livejournal.com/users/dershem/# ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu

Re: [Finale] Solo Oboe

>Does anyone else feel that the solo oboe in Finale's Garritan has intonation problems?< Maybe the rest of the Garritan orchestra should tune to the oboe - that's how it works in real life isn't it? ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists

[Finale] Solo Oboe

Does anyone else feel that the solo oboe in Finale's Garritan has intonation problems?   All the best,   Lawrence   "þaes ofereode - þisses swa maeg"http://lawrenceyates.co.ukDulcian Wind Quintet: http://dulcianwind.co.uk ___ Finale mailing list Fin