On the current piece, I decided that I wanted to determine to determine the measure widths.
Now I am not so sure that was a good choice.. I gavethe measuresall a uniform width; but I think it makes the layout a bit artificial.
So now, whenever I unlock the systems, all the measures seem to
They're all optimized and locked.
On 5/3/06, dc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kim Patrick Clow écrit:I am increasing the distance between the brace and the music on the right.
Staff Tool Staff Edit Group Attributes will do that for each staff, but there has to be a easierway where I can make this a
Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
They're all optimized and locked.
Then you're stuck doing it 70 times.
Or you can leave them locked and unoptimize them, adjust the brace
position, then reoptimize the score and things should return to how they
are now. At least they have when I've had to do such
On 03.05.2006 Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
On the current piece, I decided that I wanted to determine to determine the
measure widths.
Now I am not so sure that was a good choice.. I gave the measures all a uniform width; but I think it makes the layout a bit artificial.
So now, whenever I
If you are looking for a global setting, look at the layer options.
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
On 03.05.2006 dhbailey wrote:
Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
They're all optimized and locked.
Then you're stuck doing it 70 times.
Actually, you can use TGTools. There are several indispensible tools for
the kind of thing you want to do with optimized scores. This alone is
well worth the price
Off the top of my head, this is the start of my wishlist for
improvements and extensions to Finale's capabilities, in no particular
order (if any of them can be done in a way I'm not realising, please
tell me!):
A better implementation of microtones (or even just a simple preset that
enables
Figured bass. With a decent font.
That's not too much to ask for, is it :-)
On 5/3/06, Owain Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Off the top of my head, this is the start of my wishlist forimprovements and extensions to Finale's capabilities, in no particular
order (if any of them can be done in a
On 03 May 2006, at 3:52 PM, Owain Sutton wrote:
Duration-linked geometric shapes. The example I've got in mind is
where
they were used to indicate the compass to be used in an improvised
section, with the compass expanding and contracting at various points.
Can easily be done with custom
At 04:03 PM 5/3/2006 -0400, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 03 May 2006, at 3:52 PM, Owain Sutton wrote:
'Beat-attached' expressions.
Already supported (since at least Fin2004, if not earlier... ).
Please tell how this is done. I see only note measure, not beat. I can
attach to an existing rest,
I posted this over at O-List during a discussion that moved over here with
Owain's post.
Some of you may recall the problem of the interwoven tuplets that I
described a few weeks ago, and I was wondering if anybody knew how to get
this to play back directly from the score, or enter it in an
Measure-attached expressions can be attached to a beat. Open the
Finale Default File and create a measure-attached mark -- the
very first box in the Measure Expression Alignment dialog is the
horizontal distance from the alignment point, and the default unit is
beats.
- Darcy
-
On 03.05.2006 Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
Figured bass. With a decent font.
Personally I wouldn't care about the font, if it was implemented in a
way where it can utilize both fonts and the shape designer. I would
prefer it to be a sub-mode of the chord tool, including basic playback
At 04:50 PM 5/3/2006 -0400, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Measure-attached expressions can be attached to a beat. Open the
Finale Default File and create a measure-attached mark -- the
very first box in the Measure Expression Alignment dialog is the
horizontal distance from the alignment
On 5/3/06 3:26 PM, dc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- the possibility to merge several files into one without losing anything.
I'd love to see this in the way of a master document / subdocument form so
that you could set document options for each individual file, (and retain
them as you import them
Many of these have pretty good solutions now.
Duration-linked geometric shapes.
Custom Lines cover a large number of scenarios, quite likely including an
indicator for improvised sections.
More flexibility and ease of application of custom noteheads, and
'smart' stem connections which
On May 3, 2006, at 3:52 PM, Owain Sutton wrote:
Off the top of my head, this is the start of my wishlist for
improvements and extensions to Finale's capabilities, in no particular
order (if any of them can be done in a way I'm not realising, please
tell me!):
Less global document settings.
Le 06-05-03 à 17:06, Johannes Gebauer a écrit :
On 03.05.2006 Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
Figured bass. With a decent font.
Personally I wouldn't care about the font, if it was implemented in
a way where it can utilize both fonts and the shape designer. I
would prefer it to be a sub-mode of
A number of responses, in no order at all
Duration-linked geometric shapes.
Custom Lines cover a large number of scenarios, quite likely
including an indicator for improvised sections.
Not with anything like the flexibility I'd have liked. I'll immediately
admit that this is
Owain Sutton wrote:
(a) building expressions for such things counts as a workaround to me
(and if we're picky, 2/8 and 2/10 have different spacing requirements,
and I think that's a global setting ;) ). (b) If it's not necessary to
implement, how about playback?! When they're part of
The ability to use EPS, Adobe pictures, or whatever as expressions. Like
the graphics tool, except 20 times better and more flexible. That would
be very cool.
Éric Dussault wrote:
Personally, the thing I would like the most is having the expression
designer completely redesigned. It is so
Hi everyone:I am trying to do two things:I want to keep the current size of my staffs/staves.
BUT I want to decrease the distance between them, in the hope of
getting three systems per page versus the two I have now.
I have used the system reduction tool, but that ends up reducing the size of
I am not against the idea, if some people find it useful, but I want
Finale to have modern drawing tools within the Shape Designer. Right
now I feel like entering the Paint software that was part of Windows
95 (maybe earlier). I don't like the «Commodore 64» feel to it!
Anyway I would not
Oh, but Paint is one of those great bundled Apps that comes with Windows
http://www.apple.com/getamac/ads/
Éric Dussault wrote:
I am not against the idea, if some people find it useful, but I want
Finale to have modern drawing tools within the Shape Designer. Right
now I feel like entering
On Wed, May 3, 2006 9:19 pm, Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
I want to keep the current size of my staffs/staves.
BUT I want to decrease the distance between them, in the hope of
getting three systems per page versus the two I have now.
Select the Staff tool, select all of your staves, and do Staff |
Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
Hi everyone:
I am trying to do two things:
I want to keep the current size of my staffs/staves.
BUT I want to decrease the distance between them, in the hope of
getting three systems per page versus the two I have now.
You can change the spacing between staves a
On May 3, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
On Wed, May 3, 2006 9:19 pm, Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
I want to keep the current size of my staffs/staves.
BUT I want to decrease the distance between them, in the hope of
getting three systems per page versus the two I have now.
Select the
27 matches
Mail list logo
