Eric Dannewitz wrote:
You could try emailing support. They are really prompt on registration
things.
They replied asking if my computer has an Intel chip, which it does - I
just bought it a couple of weeks ago. Apparently I need to download and
install something, so it will have to wait un
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I change to getting the posts one at a time?
Vivian
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
The
How do I change to getting the posts one at a time?
Vivian
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Friends:
I would elaborate my earlier comments just a bit. I wrote that I make
the decision as to whether I'm going to do individual or separate files
before entering a note. I've not yet run into the case where I couldn't
decide which way I wanted to do it, but if I thought there was any
c
On 14 Sep 2006 at 4:19, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
> I'm not sure what I would do on a four movement work for quartet.
> I've done them, and I've done them both as a large file, and as four
> shorter ones. Which method I would choose would depend upon a number
> of considerations, including (but no
On 14 Sep 2006 at 10:11, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
> Phil Daley / 2006/09/14 / 06:35 AM wrote:
>
> >If you installed Win98 and then upgraded to Win2K and then upgraded
> >to WinXP, the program would probably run.
>
> I never do this since I don't feel safe, but I am simply curious here
> if you can d
Dear Chuck and all.
I have one of those Radeon 7000 and it is not versavision capable. The card
has DVI ouput but it is not too speedy as Darcy said. Maybe with the new
ROM...
But the ATI Radeon 9200 (with 128 Mb) is only 130 bucks at owc.com
See http://eshop.macsales.com/item/ATI%20Technologies
On 14 Sep 2006 at 0:02, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
> David W. Fenton / 2006/09/13 / 08:30 PM wrote:
>
> >Would a driver written for the PowerPC version of OS X work if run on
> > a MacIntel? Can drivers work on top of the compatibility layer
> >(whose name I've forgotten)?
> >
> >Would a driver written
Hi Eric,
See later posts. I bought one of the early G5s which didn't have ATI
cards.
Seems as if the 9200 will be OK - $130 at my local dealer, but I'll
look on ebay to see if it can be found there for less.
Thanks to all - Darcy and Robert.
Chuck
On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Eric Da
I have a feeling the 7000 Mac Edition (which, if I recall correctly,
has just 32 MB of RAM) might be a touch underpowered for a 24"
monitor. And is using the screen in rotated mode still more sluggish
than using the screen in standard mode? I remember when this feature
was first introduced
Darcy James Argue wrote:
> the Radeon 9200 Mac Edition is the only PCI-based retail card that is
> still readily available.
>
Check out ebay for a Mac 7000 Mac Edition (the earlier ATI PCI card), which I
believe with the latest ROM update is Versavision capable.
http://cgi.ebay.com/RADEON-700
If your G5's main video card is not made by ATI (which you can check
in your System Profiler), then installing any Mac-compatible PCI-
based video card from ATI will do the trick (this is assuming you
want to add a second card, not replace your current card). I believe
the Radeon 9200 Mac Ed
The cheap ATI 9200 will do...
Javier Ruiz, student.
>>
>>> I'm working on a large score and it is time to get a card that
>>> will allow rotation of my 24" monitor into portrait mode.
>>>
>>> I have an early single processor Mac G5, and I'm looking for a
>>> recommendation of the least expensiv
I think any ATI card can do that.
http://www.123macmini.com/news/story/293.html
http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/Graphics/mac_X800_XT_review/index5b.html
In fact, you might already have a card in the G5 that supports it.
http://www.ati.com/products/radeon9600/radeon9600propcmac/specs.html
I believe t
Thanks David and Noel.
BC
- Original Message -
From: "Noel Stoutenburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 2:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Files and Printing
Bruce E. Clausen wrote:
Novice question: I'm working in FinWin06 and getting ready to print
score
Hi Tim,
Your system is newer and has a graphics card that supports rotation.
My graphics card does not.
thanks,
Chuck
On Sep 14, 2006, at 9:44 AM, tim-cates wrote:
in my system prefs - under monitors, there is a pop-up menu item
for rotation (90, 180, or 270 degrees) - would that do th
I might add my own experience when replacing a violinist colleague at the last moment for a choral concert with a well-known choral (and not-so-great orchestral) conductor.
At one really tricky point I found pencilled in my part a pair of eyeglasses in a circle with a diagonal line over it (i.e.
Sorry, I should have said "in any parts" that I have conducted.
At 9/14/2006 12:58 PM, Andrew Stiller wrote:
>> have never seen (in 40 years) that symbol in any music I have
>> conducted
>
>Well you wouldn't, would you? since it A) has no place in the *score*
>of anything and B) is normally h
have never seen (in 40 years) that symbol in any music I have
conducted
Well you wouldn't, would you? since it A) has no place in the *score*
of anything and B) is normally handwritten in the part, not printed by
a publisher.
I've never seen the eyeglasses in any published score I've ever
in my system prefs - under monitors, there is a pop-up menu item for
rotation (90, 180, or 270 degrees) - would that do the trick for you?
- (i'm running 10.4.7 on a dual G5 tower with a 20" cinema display) -
just wondering if you need the extra hardware
TC
On Sep 14, 2006, at 11:33 A
I'm working on a large score and it is time to get a card that will
allow rotation of my 24" monitor into portrait mode.
I have an early single processor Mac G5, and I'm looking for a
recommendation of the least expensive graphics card that will support
Versavision. I have no special need
At 9/14/2006 10:11 AM, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
>Phil Daley / 2006/09/14 / 06:35 AM wrote:
>
>>If you installed Win98 and then upgraded to Win2K and then upgraded to
>>WinXP, the program would probably run.
>
>I never do this since I don't feel safe, but I am simply curious here if
>you can do this e
Oh come on now. Stop with the FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt). You really
don't know what the hell you are talking about.
Phil Daley wrote:
At 9/13/2006 06:44 PM, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
>Noel Stoutenburg / 2006/09/13 / 05:15 PM wrote:
>
>>but the company manufacturing the chipset on the
>>sound c
Phil Daley / 2006/09/14 / 06:35 AM wrote:
>If you installed Win98 and then upgraded to Win2K and then upgraded to
>WinXP, the program would probably run.
I never do this since I don't feel safe, but I am simply curious here if
you can do this even though you want NTFS, or do you have to stay wit
Phil Daley wrote:
At 9/13/2006 05:13 PM, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
>Eric Dannewitz wrote:
>> No no, everything runs perfect on his circa 1996 PC running Windows.
>> Oh, and no viruses either. Or blue screens of death.
>To be fair, it was a ca. 2000 PC running WIN 98 SE, until earlier this
>spring
At 9/13/2006 06:44 PM, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
>Noel Stoutenburg / 2006/09/13 / 05:15 PM wrote:
>
>>but the company manufacturing the chipset on the
>>sound card no longer does so, and no longer supports it; I had the most
>>recent driver available.
>
>Tell me about it.
>I have two soft samplers no
At 9/13/2006 05:13 PM, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
>Eric Dannewitz wrote:
>> No no, everything runs perfect on his circa 1996 PC running Windows.
>> Oh, and no viruses either. Or blue screens of death.
>To be fair, it was a ca. 2000 PC running WIN 98 SE, until earlier this
>spring when the machine ex
At 9/13/2006 05:09 PM, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
>Phil Daley's comment, in part wrote:
>> It continues to amaze me of the steps Mac users must make to update to
>> new software/machines, especially being forced to upgrade their
>> software when upgrading machines.
>>
>> In Windows, everything just
Bruce E. Clausen wrote:
Novice question: I'm working in FinWin06 and getting ready to print
score and parts for a quartet, four movement work. Each movement is a
separate file. Am I better off printing files separately or creating
one super file with all movements included? Which would make
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear person,
I recieve Finale as a file. How can I get it as posts?
Vivian
If you want it not to be a digest, you have to follow the link at the
bottom of each post and reset your preferences.
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Bruce E. Clausen wrote:
Novice question: I'm working in FinWin06 and getting ready to print
score and parts for a quartet, four movement work. Each movement is a
separate file. Am I better off printing files separately or creating
one super file with all movements included? Which would make
31 matches
Mail list logo
