[Finale] Chord Font missing

Hi, I like to use Applegothic for my chord symbol, and I save this setting as a part of the Documents Setting Library. The problem is that when I load this Library into a document, the font name doesn't appear in the Documents Setting/Fonts section. Yesterday when I loaded the Documents S

Re: [Finale] Bach's triplet notation - OT

On 15.04.2007 Charles Small wrote: So I'd like to know if it was standard practice in Bach's day, if other examples can be adduced, and when and how the convention changed to our modern version. It certainly appears in other examples. I can certainly state one I saw recently in the original

Re: [Finale] Bach's triplet notation - OT

On 15.04.2007 Kim Patrick Clow wrote: I'm having a bit of a timing with the *same* issue as you-- interestingly enough in the same time signature and it's a baroque composer (Graupner). You can see a screenshot of the manuscript here: http://www.bytenet.net/kpclow/brian/graupner/sarabande.jpg T

Re: [Finale] Show n' tell, etc.

Don Hart wrote: [snip]> 3. From what I've heard, and experienced to a lesser degree, we seem to be in a generally unhelpful period when it come to MM support. Any prevailing wisdom as to how to best report bugs and request features? Write your bug report or feature request on a piece of pape

Re: [Finale] Bach's triplet notation - OT

A logical explanation (to me) for this notation is that 8th note triplets provide clarity because of their beaming, and eliminate the need to distinguish between quarter note triplets and regular quarter notes. It also keeps intact the practice of discontinuing the 3 in the triplet once a pattern

Re: [Finale] extracting parts

At 08:23 PM 4/15/2007, Aaron Rabushka wrote: >Does the Finale part-extraction engine have an option to print the name of >the instrument at the top of evey page? Right now I'm only getting the name >of the instrument on page 1 of each part. I am running Finale 2003 under >Windows XP. No, not in F

Re: [Finale] extracting parts

On Apr 15, 2007, at 8:23 PM, Aaron Rabushka wrote: Does the Finale part-extraction engine have an option to print the name of the instrument at the top of evey page? Right now I'm only getting the name of the instrument on page 1 of each part. I am running Finale 2003 under Windows XP.

RE: RE OT: [Finale] Show n' tell, etc.

Iemand geeft 'n partij...en ik ben er niet bij... ;-( Jim From: Barbara Touburg Sent: Sun 15-Apr-07 18:29 To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: Re: RE OT: [Finale] Show n' tell, etc. You're in! David W. Fenton wrote: On 16 Apr 2007 at 0:03, Barbara Touburg wrote: Je spreekt Nederlands? Dan ben

Re: [Finale] Bach's triplet notation - OT

At 6:16 PM -0400 4/15/07, David W. Fenton wrote: My guess is that this is an artifact of the older practice of black vs. white notation. You can see something similar in one of Couperin's Tenebrae Lessons, which is in 3/2 also, but with 8th-note subdivisions with white noteheads. I'm foggy on th

[Finale] extracting parts

Does the Finale part-extraction engine have an option to print the name of the instrument at the top of evey page? Right now I'm only getting the name of the instrument on page 1 of each part. I am running Finale 2003 under Windows XP. Also, I reguarly get fermate showing up on the bottom of the s

Re: [Finale] Re: Bach's triplet notation - OT

On Apr 15, 2007, at 6:15 PM, Neal Gittleman wrote: Living in a world that seems to unduly prize consistency, we're obliged to be more precise in our notation. (And even if we don't feel so-obliged, Finale will oblige us!) That last parenthetical comment is one of the most insightful thi

Re: [Finale] Bach's triplet notation - OT

On 4/15/07, David W. Fenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: To Kim: didn't you have a very similar example of just such a triplet subdivision that wasn't clearly indicated that you posted earlier? Yes, in fact I think it was a bit more complex than this latest example-- btw my editor agreed with yo

Re: [Finale] Bach's triplet notation - OT

D.C.! David W. Fenton wrote: Surely somebody on the list can amplify the above with some actual facts! ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Re: RE OT: [Finale] Show n' tell, etc.

You're in! David W. Fenton wrote: On 16 Apr 2007 at 0:03, Barbara Touburg wrote: Je spreekt Nederlands? Dan ben je nummer vier (minstens). You speak Dutch? Then you're number four (at least). (Minke H., Dennis B.-K., Hans Sw., me) I don't speak it or write it, but it's close enough to Germ

Re: RE OT: [Finale] Show n' tell, etc.

Ik begrijp een keen beetje nederlands, nog twee weeken en Amsterdam. I grew up listening to Yiddish, which has lots of similarities. Aaron J. Rabushka [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://users.waymark.net/arabushk - Original Message - From: "Barbara Touburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, Ap

Re: [Finale] Re: Bach's triplet notation - OT

Charles: Wow, that is a doozy. I'd read it the same way you do... But it's disconcerting that the same notation which seems to be a tuplet in m5 is an ordinary dotted-quarter-plus-8th in m4 and m6! Me: Though probably not disconcerting to folks of the time, when there was so much about mu

Re: RE OT: [Finale] Show n' tell, etc.

On 16 Apr 2007 at 0:03, Barbara Touburg wrote: > Je spreekt Nederlands? Dan ben je nummer vier (minstens). > You speak Dutch? Then you're number four (at least). > (Minke H., Dennis B.-K., Hans Sw., me) I don't speak it or write it, but it's close enough to German that I can often understand mos

Re: [Finale] Bach's triplet notation - OT

On 15 Apr 2007 at 12:44, Carl Dershem wrote: > Kim Patrick Clow wrote: > > > I'm having a bit of a timing with the *same* issue as you-- > > interestingly enough in the same time signature and it's a baroque > > composer (Graupner). You can see a screenshot of the manuscript > > here: > > > > ht

Re: [Finale] Bach's triplet notation - OT

On 15 Apr 2007 at 14:46, Charles Small wrote: > The phenomenon in question occurs in Bach's Orgelbuchlein, #10 (In > Dulce Jubilo). The piece is in 3/2, and there are running triplets, > three equal notes to each half-note (minim). In modern usage, we'd > write a triplet of quarters (crotchets)

Re: RE OT: [Finale] Show n' tell, etc.

Je spreekt Nederlands? Dan ben je nummer vier (minstens). You speak Dutch? Then you're number four (at least). (Minke H., Dennis B.-K., Hans Sw., me) Aaron Rabushka wrote: Oen hier en de Verenigde Staten (North Carolina) is KOUD! ___ Finale mailing

Re: RE OT: [Finale] Show n' tell, etc.

Oen hier en de Verenigde Staten (North Carolina) is KOUD! Aaron J. Rabushka [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://users.waymark.net/arabushk - Original Message - From: "Minke Hylarides" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 3:36 PM Subject: RE OT: [Finale] Show n' tell, etc. > >

[Finale] Re: Bach's triplet notation - OT

On 15-Apr-07, at 3:31 PM, Kim Patrick Clow wrote: (Graupner). You can see a screenshot of the manuscript here: http://www.bytenet.net/kpclow/brian/graupner/sarabande.jpg The troublesome issue for me is measure 5, I assume the first three notes are tuplet, then the next three, then the next t

Re: RE OT: [Finale] Show n' tell, etc.

Minke Hylarides wrote: How curious: here in Holland we have the hottest april ever...! Almost 30 degrees (celsius - how much is that in Fahrenheit? almost 90?) today. It LOOKS like spring, it FEELS like summer! Minke That's 86 degreed F. Pretty warm! A useful conversion utility is as

RE OT: [Finale] Show n' tell, etc.

> -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: Don Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: zondag 15 april 2007 17:31 > Aan: finale@shsu.edu > Onderwerp: [Finale] Show n' tell, etc. > > An assortment of items for everyone - especially those tucked in > (hopefully) > away from the wild weather here

Re: [Finale] Bach's triplet notation - OT

Kim Patrick Clow wrote: I'm having a bit of a timing with the *same* issue as you-- interestingly enough in the same time signature and it's a baroque composer (Graupner). You can see a screenshot of the manuscript here: http://www.bytenet.net/kpclow/brian/graupner/sarabande.jpg The troublesom

Re: [Finale] Sandpaper block notation

Andrew Stiller wrote: The rules are as for güiro. See my book, pp. 184-186. There I give forte as the loudest volume attainable on the sandblocks, but if anything I think it would be less. Certainly a violin's fortissimo would drown out anything the sandblocks could produce. That's what belt

Re: [Finale] Bach's triplet notation - OT

On 4/15/07, Charles Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So I'd like to know if it was standard practice in Bach's day, if other examples can be adduced, and when and how the convention changed to our modern version. Thanks in advance for any enlightenment!! Ch.S. Hi Charles: I'm having a bit of

[Finale] Bach's triplet notation - OT

Hello all, This is a history-of-notation question-- only the barest connection with Finale. Posting here because I know there are lots of knowledgeable notation folk on this list whom I'm hoping to interest. The phenomenon in question occurs in Bach's Orgelbuchlein, #10 (In Dulce Jubilo).

Re: [Finale] Show n' tell, etc.

On 15.04.2007 Don Hart wrote: especially those tucked in (hopefully) away from the wild weather here in the states Really? We are having the hottest April ever, with around 30 degrees C today. Beautiful, if a little worrying... Johannes -- http://www.musikmanufaktur.com http://www.camerata-

Re: [Finale] Sandpaper block notation

The rules are as for güiro. except that this doesn't account for the different techniques of rubbing (continuous sound) and tremolo (reiteration). Certainly a violin's fortissimo would drown out anything the sandblocks could produce. depends on the register, extreme high vlns wouldn't

Re: [Finale] Sandpaper block notation

if the rubbing is NOT a circular, sustained motion, you could instead write the struck notes as 16ths staccato and the rubbed notes as 8ths tenuto. Are you suggesting normal noteheads or x-heads? in this case normal noteheads. -- shirling & neueweise ... new music publishers mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [Finale] Show n' tell, etc.

On Apr 15, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Don Hart wrote: 2. Has anyone suggested to MM that we incorporate move/copy layers into the Items to Copy dialog, or at least duplicate the copy part there? Any thoughts? Well it certainly should be moved *somewhere.* In my view, though, the Items To Copy di

Re: [Finale] Sandpaper block notation

The rules are as for güiro. See my book, pp. 184-186. There I give forte as the loudest volume attainable on the sandblocks, but if anything I think it would be less. Certainly a violin's fortissimo would drown out anything the sandblocks could produce. Andrew Stiller Kallisti Music Press http

[Finale] O.T. Éditions de L'Oiseau-Lyre d iscussed on "On An Overgrown Path"

Good morning: There is a wonderful post on the history of Éditions de L'Oiseau-Lyre and its founder Louise Dyer. Mrs. Dyer was responsible for comissioning musicologists to perpare performing editions of French baroque composers such as Rameau, Lully, etc). Particularly quaint was this story: "

Re: [Finale] Sandpaper block notation

At 12:43 AM +0200 4/15/07, shirling & neueweise wrote: if the rubbing is NOT a circular, sustained motion, you could instead write the struck notes as 16ths staccato and the rubbed notes as 8ths tenuto. Are you suggesting normal noteheads or x-heads? are you specifying what grit to use? 4

[Finale] Show n' tell, etc.

An assortment of items for everyone - especially those tucked in (hopefully) away from the wild weather here in the states: 1. working with two windows of a file open - not sure if everyone is aware that when working this way, changes/saves made in either window are introduced into the file. Has