perhaps of interest to some, or colleagues.
--
ORCiM SEMINAR SOUND AND SCORE
22-23 April 2010
http://www.orpheusinstituut.be/en/research-centre/academic-year-2009-2010#sound
As an art form based upon sound, music deals with complex semiotic
translations and interactions between different
How do I delete (or insert) measures without affecting all the measure
number regions that appears afterwards? (I have alot of those regions...)
Best regards,
Jari Williamsson
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Hi All,
I'm using FinMac2010b.r1 and Bill Duncan's templates.
I'm having a strange problem with measure numbers in multi-measure
rests. Here is what happens when I generate linked parts. There are two
sets of measure numbers: one for the multi-measure rest and one for
measure one:
Is there something simple I'm missing?
you mean like an explanation of what you want or don't want? 8-)
the only SC/PTs diff seems to be hide 1st m# in region on/off
you have defined to have on ALL measures AND on all mm rests, what
you see is 100% correct according to your settings.
you
can't say off the top of my head if it will help but maybe try doing
it via the layout tool with the measure(s) to delete constrained to a
single system, then delete/add system from layout menu.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Friends,
I would do as Jef suggests,
can't say off the top of my head if it will help but maybe try doing
it via the layout tool with the measure(s) to delete constrained to a
single system, then delete/add system from layout menu.
except that I would not delete the measures, but rather hide
noel, are you serious?!?! wow. keeping empty measures in the doc is
just counterproductive, no matter how quick you can do what you
describe. imagine doing that for an entire orch set of parts. ouch.
but if you do insist on leaving them in, why not just define them as
0-width with no
On 21 Jan 2010 at 6:45, dc wrote:
David W. Fenton écrit:
This is what I did, but the spacing was not quite what I'd have
preferred.
You'll get much better results by hidding only the syllables on melismas.
And more work, of course.
It seems I'm out of luck on this, as I don't see any way
I am still incredibly stupid when it comes to creating staff groups.
I have a piece with two sopranos, and to save left margin space, I'm
using Sopranos for the starting group name and Sop. for the
abbreviation, and then I and II for the staff names of the individual
staves.
The first staff
On 21 Jan 2010 at 20:33, David W. Fenton wrote:
I am still incredibly stupid when it comes to creating staff groups.
I have a piece with two sopranos, and to save left margin space, I'm
using Sopranos for the starting group name and Sop. for the
abbreviation, and then I and II for the
David W. Fenton wrote:
I am still incredibly stupid when it comes to creating staff groups.
I have a piece with two sopranos, and to save left margin space, I'm
using Sopranos for the starting group name and Sop. for the
abbreviation, and then I and II for the staff names of the individual
SN jef chippewa wrote:
noel, are you serious?!?! wow. keeping empty measures in the doc is
just counterproductive, no matter how quick you can do what you describe.
Jari wanted to be able to delete (and also insert, though I missed that
bit) measures without affecting a lot of subsequent
On 21 Jan 2010 at 19:53, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
I am still incredibly stupid when it comes to creating staff groups.
I have a piece with two sopranos, and to save left margin space, I'm
using Sopranos for the starting group name and Sop. for the
abbreviation,
Hi Jef,
Thanks for confirming that Finale was doing what I was telling it to do
rather than what I meant for it to do.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010, SN jef chippewa shirl...@newmusicnotation.com wrote
you mean like an explanation of what you want or don't want? 8-)
Yes! If I don't know what I want, I
14 matches
Mail list logo
