combined with sheer power of your plugins are forcing me to
thoroughly investigate how I can stick with Finale. They're that good!
Ouch- is that a recent Faber requirement?
David
--
David Horne | www.davidhorne.net
www.boosey.com/horne
tel:+44(0)161-236-3126|mobile:+44(0)7922-157352
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:30:26 -0800, Eric Dannewitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So, there is this rather serious bug in Finale 2007 running under an
intel mac. You can't edit the system margins, or the page margins using
the Menus (IE: Page Layout-Page Margins-Edit Page Margins).
But, if you
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 11:16:37 +0100, dc [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Johannes Gebauer écrit:
As far as I can tell there is no way to show or hide accidentals in the
parts and score separately. I hadn't thought about this before, but this
is really annoying in one situation: Tied notes should not
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:21:17 +, Robert Patterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Owain Sutton:
Put me in the cynic camp
Oh come on. Fin07 offers perhaps the single biggest enhancement in the
history of the product (linked parts) and all anyone can think of is to
whine about the
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:49:07 -0400, Dan Carno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Hi David,
After extracting parts, apply the Blank Notation staff style to the cue
measures in the score. Provided you apply the style only to the layer
that
holds the cue, you only need to move the default rest to the
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:54:16 -0700 (PDT), Tyler Turner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[]
Just to be sure we're on the same page, if a measure
in the score should be completely blank except for a
default whole rest, you would use the new staff style,
blank notation with rests on that measure in the
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:50:36 +, Robert Patterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I don't think
I can optimise a staff on a particular page if it has this staff style
applied, which would be an issue. Is there a way around that?
Using TGTools, you can optimize any staff no matter what's
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:37:52 +, Robert Patterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I use some of TGTools' features constantly, but not this one!
In case you haven't already figured it out, I was referring to the Staff
List Manager. (The name is misleading, but it is really about staff
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:25:33 +0200, Michael Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
The problem with the missing middle slash of the tremolo is due to a
fault in the Maestro font. If you open the font in a font editor you
can see that there are in fact three copies of the middle slash
superimposed.
I just received a copy of a score from my publishers this morning, and
noticed that two and three line tremolo markings (originally using
Maestro) haven't printed correctly. The two line tremolo only has one
line, and the three line tremolo, two- the middle one 'missing' so it
looks a little odd.
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 12:25:43 +0200, Bettina Crimmins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi David,
I have the same problem when printing with a Xerox DocuPrint N2825
printer. My workaround is to use the petrucci tremolo symbols. I'm
using WinFin 2006 and PDFs also look fine.
Best wishes,
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 12:54:26 +0200, Johannes Gebauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 22.04.2006 David Horne wrote:
I just received a copy of a score from my publishers this morning, and
noticed that two and three line tremolo markings (originally using
Maestro) haven't printed correctly
Just noticed that the Demo is now available. Is there anything I should
be careful of prior to installation? I currently have Fin 2005, and I'm
on Mac OS X 10.4.2.
This may be an upgrade I skip- there don't seem to be enough notation
enhancements which interest me. Also, I'm not sure about the
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:29:46 +0200, Johannes Gebauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 21:48 Uhr David Horne wrote:
This may be an upgrade I skip- there don't seem to be enough notation
enhancements which interest me. Also, I'm not sure about the
performance on my G4 powerbook. However, I'm
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 11:29:39 -0400, A-NO-NE Music [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
[]
Tiger might not be cache clean. I have two applications that slows down
terribly by running process intensive task outside of the app, and the
app doesn't regain its performance until relaunching. One of them is a
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 03:46:57 -0400, A-NO-NE Music [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
David Horne / 2005/06/04 / 08:21 PM wrote:
Since upgrading to Tiger (10.4.1) Finale freezes whenever I try to
extract a fairly big part from a file, say more than 300 bars. I've
actually upgraded the RAM (now have
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:20:24 +0200, Johannes Gebauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
You don't say whether you did a permissions repair yet. Did you? I
recently fixed a friends Mac, which completely froze after a few minutes
every time, and after it had been to the shop for a check up. After I
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:50:17 -0400, David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
[]
The proof would be to test part extraction in a file of similar
length. If the problem occurs at about the same place, then it's
probably not data-based (unless both files coincidentally happen to
have a problem
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 18:04:57 -0400, shirling neueweise
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
mac mini 1.42/1G, 10.3.9, Fin2005
777 measures, 80+ individual instruments (strings 4 layers/parts to a
stave)
i did a mixture of individual part (piccolo, bass clarinet, synth)
and section extraction
Since upgrading to Tiger (10.4.1) Finale freezes whenever I try to
extract a fairly big part from a file, say more than 300 bars. I've
actually upgraded the RAM (now have 768MB on a 1.33 G4 PB) since
upgrading the OS. I never had a problem with this in Panther, and am a
bit puzzled. Any idea what
On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 20:39:27 -0400, David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On 4 Jun 2005 at 1:21, David Horne wrote:
Since upgrading to Tiger (10.4.1) Finale freezes whenever I try to
extract a fairly big part from a file, say more than 300 bars. I've
actually upgraded the RAM (now have
On Tue, 31 May 2005 10:15:50 -0400, Neal Gittleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[]
Any suggestions on how I can get those secondary beams to connect
either by giving me another step to do or by suggesting a different
overall strategy for note entry?
This may not be a very elegant solution- but
On Sun, 15 May 2005 10:38:58 -0400, Andrew Stiller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On May 15, 2005, at 6:20 AM, Eden - Lawrence D. wrote:
Andrew,
Check which version of Firefox you downloaded. If you are using an OS
9x
version that requires a reboot, you would do well to download the OSX
I notice that Finale will not always space individual measures
correctly- specifically it will ignore certain accidentals, causing them
to be crushed tothether. It seems quite random. FWIW, this is something
I've noticed in all versions I've used in the last few years, but its
infrequency has
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:32:53 -0500, Darcy James Argue
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi David,
Have you checked to see if you have multiple versions of the Finale
fonts installed in multiple locations on your HD? It may be that you
still have the old Fin2004 fonts (with the PDF issues)
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:22:37 -0600, Robert Patterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I notice David said he was on 10.3.5. That would suggest to me that he
hasn't run Software Update to get to 10.3.8. (The actual OS version is
available from About this Mac in the apple menu.) I don't know if this
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 05:15:47 -0500, Darcy James Argue
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 14 Mar 2005, at 4:42 AM, David Horne wrote:
Just to confirm the problem still persists in 2005b. OK, I've tried
some
tests and this problem seems consistent on my set up. I'd be interested
to know
Just one final thing before I go! :) When I create similar (i.e.
combination of quaver and crotchet triplets) _non_ engraver tuplets, the
problem doesn't arise. Very strange. Ah, well, looks like I'm the only
one experiencing this oddity- what on earth could be causing this on my
system though.
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:48:28 +0100, Johannes Gebauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I just tried it, too, and it seems you are right. So perhaps it was
corrected in 2k5b, which seems to indicate it was a Finale problem after
all (although it only showed in Reader 5, and not in Reader 6).
I guess
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 05:15:47 -0500, Darcy James Argue
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 14 Mar 2005, at 4:42 AM, David Horne wrote:
Just to confirm the problem still persists in 2005b. OK, I've tried
some
tests and this problem seems consistent on my set up. I'd be interested
to know
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 21:35:59 -0500, Darcy James Argue
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 14 Mar 2005, at 8:25 PM, David Horne wrote:
Darcy, can you confirm that you were using engraver tuplets? If not,
what happens if you do? If someone else replicated my problem, I'm
inclined to think it's
Today, I noticed that a tuplet (triplet quaver and crotchet) was missing
from a pdf created in os x from an eps file (created using the 'compile
postscript listing' function.) FWIW, it doesn't print when printed on a
non-ps printer. (I don't have a ps printer at home so can't check that.)
It seems
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:18:32 -0500, Darcy James Argue
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 13 Mar 2005, at 7:45 PM, Robert Patterson wrote:
David Horne wrote:
It seems fine however, when I create the pdf directly within Finale,
but
that has it's own potential problems.
Perhaps I missed
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:31:35 -0500, Darcy James Argue
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I believe this was a font problem, and it was fixed in Fin2004b (and
also with a standalone Mac OS X font update).
I have a PostScript printer, I always print to PDF directly from
Finale, and since installing
I seem to remember a thread here quite a while back reporting a bug when
printing pdfs of finale 95 files created with OS X. Well, I just
received a score from my publishers, and it seems the bug has struck
again! All whole bar and semiquaver rests print as ppp marks. (File was
created with Finale
35 matches
Mail list logo
