Re: [Finale] Copy only note positioning

2006-05-29 Thread Christopher Smith
On May 29, 2006, at 10:11 AM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote: Hi all, Maybe it's the long weekend, but I'm coming up blank on this. I have a score where all the note rhythms are exactly the same, consisting of interleaved tuplets (sixteeenth tuplets of 7:6, 5:4, 4:4 and 3:2). The composer

Re: [Finale] Copy only note positioning

2006-05-29 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
At 10:42 AM 5/29/06 -0400, Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Under Items to Copy... Measure Items... Note Positioning doesn't do it? I don't know how it would apply to partial tuplets... I had checked that. I thought that would do it, but no. In reading the help, I see why. It only

Re: [Finale] Copy only note positioning

2006-05-29 Thread Robert Patterson
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote: Notes moved with the note mover tool (which is the only option for interleaving tuplets) isn't copied. Actually, there is another option for interleaving tuplets AND there is a way to copy note mover spacing. Furthermore, the way to do the latter makes the

Re: [Finale] Copy only note positioning

2006-05-29 Thread Robert Patterson
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote: I have a score where all the note rhythms are exactly the same, consisting of interleaved tuplets (sixteeenth tuplets of 7:6, 5:4, 4:4 and 3:2). I went back and read the original post, and I guess I don't understand you requirement. What's interleaved about it?

Re: [Finale] Copy only note positioning

2006-05-29 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
At 03:07 PM 5/29/06 -0500, Robert Patterson wrote: I went back and read the original post, and I guess I don't understand you requirement. What's interleaved about it? The total duration adds up to 16 16ths right? Right. But the pattern is this: 1st 7th of 7 - 1st 4th of 4 - 1st 3rd of 3 - 1st

Re: [Finale] Copy only note positioning

2006-05-29 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
At 03:07 PM 5/29/06 -0500, Robert Patterson wrote: I went back and read the original post, and I guess I don't understand you requirement. What's interleaved about it? The total duration adds up to 16 16ths right? Here's a sample page I was working out, with suggestions to the composer for

Re: [Finale] Copy only note positioning

2006-05-29 Thread Robert Patterson
So why not enter the whole thing on an underlying tuplet of 1680 64th (1680=7x5x3x16) in the time of 64 64ths? The denominator doesn't matter, but I picked the smallest one that is in Finale's UI to keep the EDU values reasonable. (You don't want any EDU value to exceed 32767.) Now within the

Re: [Finale] Copy only note positioning

2006-05-29 Thread Robert Patterson
After sending this, I realized that 1680 64ths exceeds 32767 EDUs. It may give Finale and/or my plugin fits. You could try it. You should have no problem at all with a denominator of 512th notes, but unfortunately I know of no way to enter 512ths thru Finale's UI. (Behind the UI, 512th notes