The keyword search would certainly help, I think ... but it still
might be operose (but probably better than bothering a whole bunch of
folks a lot).
Dean
On Aug 8, 2007, at 3:42 AM, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
True ... one can not expect any newbie to have read all of
At 11:15 AM 8/8/2007, Bob Morabito wrote:
>--I've found this helpful--
>
>http://www.mail-archive.com/finale@shsu.edu/
That's one of the mail archiving services I talked about.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is listed as a subscriber to this list, so
every post gets sent there and archived. But it's not of
At 8/8/2007 07:38 AM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
>At 06:42 AM 8/8/2007, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
> >But can one not expect a newbie to subscribe and do a search of the
> >archives using relevant keywords, or is this yet another way in which I
> >do not conform to the normal expectations?
>
>The archives
Hi Aaron-- I thought they are??
--I've found this helpful--
http://www.mail-archive.com/finale@shsu.edu/
Thanks
Peace, Bpb Morabito
On Wednesday, August 8, 2007, at 04:38 AM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 06:42 AM 8/8/2007, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
>But can one not expect a newbie to subscribe and
At 06:42 AM 8/8/2007, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
>But can one not expect a newbie to subscribe and do a search of the
>archives using relevant keywords, or is this yet another way in which I
>do not conform to the normal expectations?
The archives of this list are not directly searchable.
If you go
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
True ... one can not expect any newbie to have read all of the
discussions which have taken place over several years.
But can one not expect a newbie to subscribe and do a search of the
archives using relevant keywords, or is this yet another way in which I
do not confo
True ... one can not expect any newbie to have read all of the
discussions which have taken place over several years.
Dean
On Aug 7, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Bob Morabito wrote:
On Tue Aug 7 14:18:44 CDT Aaron Rabushka wrote:
And also bear in mind that newcomers to the list don't know what's
b
On Tue Aug 7 14:18:44 CDT Aaron Rabushka wrote:
And also bear in mind that newcomers to the list don't know what's been
discussed previously. I was once the unnecessary object of someone's
dirty
anger here for asking a question that he'd answered several months
before I
joined. Totally out o
nt: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Fenton
> I dunno, but a mental image of David Fenton as an easter bunny kind
> of strikes me as funny! (no offence, David!)
>
> This whole thing has gotten somewhat out of hand. I regret some of
> what I have said as well, not
I dunno, but a mental image of David Fenton as an easter bunny kind
of strikes me as funny! (no offence, David!)
This whole thing has gotten somewhat out of hand. I regret some of
what I have said as well, not because I think I was wrong, but
because it might prevent some confused person in
What is your point?
Paul Davies wrote:
It's rabbits that get myxomatosis!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Will Denayer
Sent: 07 August 2007 16:53
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: [Finale] Fenton
"What is your point?"
Wh
It's rabbits that get myxomatosis!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Will Denayer
Sent: 07 August 2007 16:53
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: [Finale] Fenton
"What is your point?"
What is it that I said to David Bailey in Decem
Please go away. Really.
Will Denayer wrote:
"What is your point?"
What is it that I said to David Bailey in December which makes you act like a
dog with myxomatosis?
Didn't I tell the truth? Didn't I try to read the fecking manual even if it was nearly impossible for me to read anything at al
"What is your point?"
What is it that I said to David Bailey in December which makes you act like a
dog with myxomatosis?
Didn't I tell the truth? Didn't I try to read the fecking manual even if it was
nearly impossible for me to read anything at all? What are you actually ranting
about?
Thank GOD, cause my Trash bin on my email can't hold much more.
David W. Fenton wrote:
You're welcome to your opinions. Certainly I'm not going to dispute
your right to hold them and to disagree with me, either on style or
content.
But I simply don't see what posts like this one accomplish. I
You really don't get it David, was what I meant, sorry.Le 06-01-29 à 16:03, Éric Dussault a écrit :You really don't get David, don't you. Eric DussaultFinale 2006c for MacReal-time Finale discussion - http://www.finaleirc.com ___
Finale mailing list
Final
Le 06-01-29 à 15:45, David W. Fenton a écrit :But I simply don't see what posts like this one accomplish. It would be one thing if you sent it to me personally, but sending it to the list seems to me to be nothing but an invitation to a flamewar, an invitation I'm not going to accept. You really
Let it go, David. You should be embarrassed!
Richard Smith
- Original Message -
From: "David W. Fenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Fenton...the throwback
On 28 Jan 2006 at 18:50, Simon Troup wrote:
On 28 Jan 2006 at 18:50, Simon Troup wrote:
> > Perhaps I'm a throwback to an older era when people spoke more
> > plainly and forcefully, and did not hedge their opinions in an
> > attempt to disguise significant disagreement and, I guess, avoid
> > conflict. David
>
> David, you're completely
> Perhaps I'm a throwback to an older era when people spoke more
> plainly and forcefully, and did not hedge
> their opinions in an attempt to disguise significant disagreement
> and, I guess, avoid conflict.
> David
David, you're completely deluded. While their is merit in many of your
posts,
> David
No David, you're not a throwback. You're a very modern, rude person.
Who puts down, with venom, anyone who you percieve as naive, wrong
and/or
21 matches
Mail list logo
