Re: [Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe

2007-02-26 Thread verngraham
Has anyone on this list come up with any clear advantages to even having a Linked Parts feature? I understand if you make some revisions (accidentals, etc.) in the score it updates the parts behind the scenes, but if you insert or delete measures, change endings repeats, or make any extensive

Re: [Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe

2007-02-26 Thread dhbailey
Yes, I've done several works using the linked-score/parts feature and it's been fine. It's not as easy as MakeMusic would have us believe, nor is it a feature which is right for everybody or every job yet. But it is a good first step, it does work well for some projects, and I can see it

Re: [Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe

2007-02-26 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 26.02.2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone on this list come up with any clear advantages to even having a Linked Parts feature? I understand if you make some revisions (accidentals, etc.) in the score it updates the parts behind the scenes, but if you insert or delete measures, change

Re: [Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe

2007-02-26 Thread shirling neueweise
Has anyone on this list come up with any clear advantages to even having a Linked Parts feature? i consider this feature to be a **major** improvement to the programme. I understand if you make some revisions (accidentals, etc.) in the score it updates the parts behind the scenes this is

[Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe

2007-02-26 Thread Jonathan Smith
Has anyone on this list come up with any clear advantages to even having a Linked Parts feature? Yes, it saves a lot of your time. It just takes a little patience to learn the ropes. Going back to part extraction will seem like the dark ages. Jonathan P.S. Any chance of breaking down

Re: [Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe

2007-02-26 Thread dhbailey
Jonathan Smith wrote: Has anyone on this list come up with any clear advantages to even having a Linked Parts feature? Yes, it saves a lot of your time. It just takes a little patience to learn the ropes. Going back to part extraction will seem like the dark ages. Jonathan P.S. Any

Re: [Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe

2007-02-24 Thread Kim Richmond
Thanks Aaron. On Feb 24, 2007, at 10:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:30:06 -0500 From: Aaron Sherber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe To: finale@shsu.edu, FINALE FINALE LIST finale@shsu.edu Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type

[Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe

2007-02-23 Thread Kim Richmond
OK, here's another shortcoming for MacFin2007c, and this one almost completely sabotaged my rehearsal of my orchestra today. It's a good thing is wasn't a recording session. In going to tweak Linked Parts after placing all entries in the score, I discovered that some measures were left out

Re: [Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe

2007-02-23 Thread Aaron Sherber
At 09:48 PM 2/23/2007, Kim Richmond wrote: I quickly learned that that meant there were measures filled with music not showing on the part. The solution was, on each part, with the Measure Tool selected, choose Create Multimeasure Rests. That reveals the hidden music. But it has to be done on