Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-13 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 12.01.2007 Andrew Stiller wrote: On Jan 11, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote: the main reason imo is that the change from Baroque to Viennese Classical was more radical than any other up to that time. Now just a pea-pickin' minute here! Surely you're not claiming this change was

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-13 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Jan 13, 2007, at 4:54 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote: from Rennaissance to baroque (how radical was that?) Immensely: polarization of the voices, especially. As late as ca. 1690 a diarist (sorry, I forget who) complained that he couldn't make head or tail of a new piece because it had no

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-13 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 14.01.2007 Andrew Stiller wrote: On Jan 13, 2007, at 4:54 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote: from Rennaissance to baroque (how radical was that?) Immensely: polarization of the voices, especially. As late as ca. 1690 a diarist (sorry, I forget who) complained that he couldn't make head or tail

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-12 Thread Kim Patrick Clow
On 1/11/07, David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: quoting me: Christoph Graupner's music reinforces this hunch, because in many ways, his sinfonias are more interesting than sinfonias that were being written just a few years later in Vienna. And while all the Viennese composers get

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-12 Thread dhbailey
dc wrote: John Howell écrit: In the very good Arts Entertainment Mozart biography, someone (it may have been Robert Marshall) played a little minuet that's supposed to be the earliest piece by Wolfie and said that whenever he played it for anyone and asked them to identify it, they hazarded

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-12 Thread David W. Fenton
On 12 Jan 2007 at 4:07, Kim Patrick Clow wrote: On 1/11/07, David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: quoting me: Christoph Graupner's music reinforces this hunch, because in many ways, his sinfonias are more interesting than sinfonias that were being written just a few years later

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-12 Thread David W. Fenton
On 12 Jan 2007 at 6:56, dhbailey wrote: dc wrote: John Howell écrit: In the very good Arts Entertainment Mozart biography, someone (it may have been Robert Marshall) played a little minuet that's supposed to be the earliest piece by Wolfie and said that whenever he played it for

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-12 Thread David W. Fenton
On 12 Jan 2007 at 10:46, dc wrote: John Howell écrit: In the very good Arts Entertainment Mozart biography, someone (it may have been Robert Marshall) played a little minuet that's supposed to be the earliest piece by Wolfie and said that whenever he played it for anyone and asked them to

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-12 Thread Daniel Wolf
David W. Fenton wrote: it was suggested that Mozart's father was the real composer; While Leopold was a better composer than he is often given credit for (most of his works that are known to the modern audience are not his best at all), he was no genius. He was a good craftsman, but

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-12 Thread Kim Patrick Clow
On 1/12/07, Daniel Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was going to let this pass, but although the above is the common assessment, and probably even Leopold Mozart's own assessment, he was so prolific that, lacking a modern complete edition, it is really impossible to say for certain that the

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-12 Thread David W. Fenton
On 12 Jan 2007 at 8:36, Kim Patrick Clow wrote: On 1/12/07, Daniel Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was going to let this pass, but although the above is the common assessment, and probably even Leopold Mozart's own assessment, he was so prolific that, lacking a modern complete edition,

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-12 Thread Kim Patrick Clow
On 1/12/07, David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, I'm afraid not. I have the symphony series reference volume and it explicitly says there was no thematic catalog. I see. I guess what I remember then was a listing of the pieces that were published in the edition with sources, and not a

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-12 Thread David W. Fenton
On 12 Jan 2007 at 14:06, Daniel Wolf wrote: David W. Fenton wrote: it was suggested that Mozart's father was the real composer; While Leopold was a better composer than he is often given credit for (most of his works that are known to the modern audience are not his best at all), he

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-12 Thread Aaron Rabushka
All this who did it first discussion reminds me of the liner notes on my old [Johann] Strauss' Greatest Hits album from years ago where the writer said that it's not the first practitioner whose the most important, but the last, the one who did what cannot be bettered. Although I'm not one to

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-12 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 12.01.2007 dc wrote: But then, why are there so many attribution problems if anyone can identify Mozart so easily? I am 100% certain that had he played a minuet by Kozeluh they would also all have been convinced it was by Mozart from a late opera. Johannes --

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-12 Thread Aaron Rabushka
David Bailey: There's a reason that Grout's History of Western Music is sold in drug stores under Sleep Aids rather than in music stores alongside books such as I was Mick Jagger's Love Child. Really? Which drugstore is this? lol Aaron J. Rabushka whose copy of Grout went to a student who

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-12 Thread John Howell
At 10:46 AM +0100 1/12/07, dc wrote: John Howell écrit: In the very good Arts Entertainment Mozart biography, someone (it may have been Robert Marshall) played a little minuet that's supposed to be the earliest piece by Wolfie and said that whenever he played it for anyone and asked them

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-12 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Jan 11, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Kim Patrick Clow wrote: I was referring to symphonies by Monn, Wagenseil, et al from the preclassical Vienna period. I should have been more specific. Well that may be the problem right there. The symphony at that period was not *supposed* to be

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-12 Thread Kim Patrick Clow
Sorry about the misfire ;) I enjoy other sinfonias from the same period or earlier (for example Stamitz or any of the composers from Mannheim). And as I pointed out earlier, Graupner's sinfonias are much more engaging to listen to. And apparently his composition of the symphony was an outgrowth

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-11 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 11.01.2007 David W. Fenton wrote: I would be skeptical of this claim until real experts on Mozart's MSS and copyists weigh in (such as Dexter Edge and Cliff Eisen). I'm surprised the Times didn't seek comment from Eisen, who, so far as I'm aware, still holds a teaching position in London.

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-11 Thread David W. Fenton
On 11 Jan 2007 at 8:54, Johannes Gebauer wrote: On 11.01.2007 David W. Fenton wrote: I would be skeptical of this claim until real experts on Mozart's MSS and copyists weigh in (such as Dexter Edge and Cliff Eisen). I'm surprised the Times didn't seek comment from Eisen, who, so far as

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-11 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 11.01.2007 David W. Fenton wrote: Personally I don't think it really matters that much, I am not crazy about Mozart's early works anyway, and if it turns out to be a worthwile piece I couldn't care less whether it is by Mozart or not. That's interesting. I'm not excited about much of any

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-11 Thread Aaron Rabushka
As I listen to some of the early Mozart operas I am indeed impressed at the quality of the work of such a young man/boy. On the other hand, it very rarely transcends pleasant to get to memorable. As I listen to La Finta Semplice, with it's Goldoni-inspired script, I find myself wishing that Mozart

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-11 Thread David W. Fenton
On 11 Jan 2007 at 16:48, Johannes Gebauer wrote: On 11.01.2007 David W. Fenton wrote: Personally I don't think it really matters that much, I am not crazy about Mozart's early works anyway, and if it turns out to be a worthwile piece I couldn't care less whether it is by Mozart or

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-11 Thread Kim Patrick Clow
On 1/11/07, Johannes Gebauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem with pre-classical and early classical music is quite complex. There are very good reasons why we find a lot of that music boring today. Could you list some of those reasons? I've always been curious how the preclassical music

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-11 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 11.01.2007 David W. Fenton wrote: On the other hand, I do find Haydn's early music extremely ingenious. The difference is that we don't actually know any of Haydn's real early music (with one or two possible exceptions I believe). Right -- early Haydn is mature music, comparable in

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-11 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 11.01.2007 David W. Fenton wrote: I'm not on broadband so can't really do that. But I've had a change in opinion about the Italian pre-classical composers after hearing Ensemble 451's playing of Sammartini -- oh, boy, what a difference from all the boring old recordings I'd heard of it

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-11 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 11.01.2007 Kim Patrick Clow wrote: On 1/11/07, Johannes Gebauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem with pre-classical and early classical music is quite complex. There are very good reasons why we find a lot of that music boring today. Could you list some of those reasons? Well, the

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-11 Thread David W. Fenton
On 11 Jan 2007 at 12:09, Kim Patrick Clow wrote: On 1/11/07, Johannes Gebauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem with pre-classical and early classical music is quite complex. There are very good reasons why we find a lot of that music boring today. Could you list some of those

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-11 Thread Kim Patrick Clow
On 1/11/07, Andrew Stiller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gluck? CPE Bach? WF Bach? Boring? No, they're not boring at all! Very talented composers, genius even! I was referring to symphonies by Monn, Wagenseil, et al from the preclassical Vienna period. I should have been more specific. Thanks

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-11 Thread dhbailey
Kim Patrick Clow wrote: On 1/11/07, Andrew Stiller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gluck? CPE Bach? WF Bach? Boring? No, they're not boring at all! Very talented composers, genius even! I was referring to symphonies by Monn, Wagenseil, et al from the preclassical Vienna period. I should have been

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-11 Thread Aaron Rabushka
Even as a former trombone player who was happy to find a trombone concerto among Wagenseil's work I must say that he doesn't excite me. Aaron J. Rabushka whose own trombone concerto is happily available on VMM-3052 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://users.waymark.net/arabushk

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-11 Thread Mariposa Symphony Orchestra
:42 AM Subject: Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered. Kim Patrick Clow wrote: On 1/11/07, Andrew Stiller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gluck? CPE Bach? WF Bach? Boring? No, they're not boring at all! Very talented composers, genius even! I was referring

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-11 Thread John Howell
At 1:36 PM -0500 1/11/07, Andrew Stiller wrote: Gluck? CPE Bach? WF Bach? Boring? Hey, I'm bored by Mozart's piano concertos, but I don't make the mistake of thinking that's Mozart's problem! Someone in grad school pointed out that you have to hit Mozart readiness. Some hit it early,

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-11 Thread David W. Fenton
On 11 Jan 2007 at 17:20, John Howell wrote: At 1:36 PM -0500 1/11/07, Andrew Stiller wrote: Gluck? CPE Bach? WF Bach? Boring? Hey, I'm bored by Mozart's piano concertos, but I don't make the mistake of thinking that's Mozart's problem! Someone in grad school pointed out that you have

[Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-10 Thread Kim Patrick Clow
An early Mozart Piano Concerto manuscript has surfaced in Salzburg, along with some solo piano pieces. Full story here: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,13509-2522292,00.html Have a great day! Kim Patrick Clow -- Kim Patrick Clow There's really only two types of music: good and bad. ~

Re: [Finale] O.T. Mozart piano concerto (movement) discovered.

2007-01-10 Thread David W. Fenton
On 10 Jan 2007 at 19:03, Kim Patrick Clow wrote: An early Mozart Piano Concerto manuscript has surfaced in Salzburg, along with some solo piano pieces. Full story here: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,13509-2522292,00.html I would be skeptical of this claim until real experts on