[Fink-devel] Apache Continued

2002-03-28 Thread Bill Bumgarner
If you want to see something truly frightening do a 'strings' on /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Admin.framework/Resources/writeconfig. Whoah! Therein lies dragons. In any case, replacing the system provided apachectl with the one from Fink causes the start/stop button in sharing to s

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: 3rd Party

2002-03-28 Thread Jeremy Higgs
On 29/3/02 8:24 AM, "Max Horn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 16:09 Uhr -0500 28.03.2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Max, >> >> I can understand your position and respect the desire not to >> dilute the Fink policy unless absolutely positively necessary, even >> if-- in this one case-- I disag

Re: [Fink-devel] fun fun fun! minicom is done!

2002-03-28 Thread Jeremy Higgs
On 29/3/02 12:26 AM, "Chris Zubrzycki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 06:40 AM, Max Horn wrote: > >> At 23:01 Uhr -0500 27.03.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1

Re: [Fink-devel] 3rd Party

2002-03-28 Thread bbum
contrib/ or optional/ sounds better than thirdparty/ to me. Wouldn't the custom fink mirror only work when installing from debian packages (which, admittedly, I never do-- I always have fink configured to download-and-build; never using dselect). b.bum On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 04:30 P

Re: [Fink-devel] 3rd Party

2002-03-28 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 What about a contrib or optional tree? when things that are binary only could be packaged, and made available to the public. (I have not read the entire policy yet, so this may be in there...) and don't forget: anyone can have a custom fink mirror

[Fink-devel] Re: 3rd Party

2002-03-28 Thread Max Horn
At 16:09 Uhr -0500 28.03.2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Max, > > I can understand your position and respect the desire not to >dilute the Fink policy unless absolutely positively necessary, even >if-- in this one case-- I disagree. > > And I *fully* support your proposal regarding a

[Fink-devel] 3rd Party

2002-03-28 Thread bbum
Max, I can understand your position and respect the desire not to dilute the Fink policy unless absolutely positively necessary, even if-- in this one case-- I disagree. And I *fully* support your proposal regarding a third party section. I actually have a few Fink packages

Re: [Fink-devel] Updates for the nessus package

2002-03-28 Thread Justin Hallett
sorry been updating sooo many pkgs lately I must have over looked this one..thanks I'll get it up to date ASAP. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >However, Nessus is now at version 1.1.14, with many new features and >vulnerability detection scripts that are not porteable to the old 1.0.9 >version. ¸.·

Re: [Fink-devel] fun fun fun! minicom is done!

2002-03-28 Thread jan . ruzicka
Hi all Minicom is cool !!! I just updated fink and installed minicom. Cool, it compiles and works. I like those presents. Fink is like christmas every day. Jan On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 08:52 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > its in the

Re: [Fink-devel] fun fun fun! minicom is done!

2002-03-28 Thread Max Horn
At 8:26 Uhr -0500 28.03.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > > >On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 06:40 AM, Max Horn wrote: > >>At 23:01 Uhr -0500 27.03.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: >>>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>>Hash: SHA1 >>> >>>Ok, minicom is i

Re: [Fink-devel] fun fun fun! minicom is done!

2002-03-28 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 its in the package submission tracker...go to http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=414256&group_id=17203 get the minicom files, and if you want kermit support, get that file too. then do: sudo mkdir -p /sw/fink/dists/local/main/finkinfo/net (assimg

Re: [Fink-devel] fun fun fun! minicom is done!

2002-03-28 Thread jan . ruzicka
:-(( where is the package ?? I don't see it. :-((( Buaa ;'- I want to play with minicom. Jan On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at 11:01 PM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ok, minicom is in the tracker, as well as lrzsz, which is a set o

Re: [Fink-devel] fun fun fun! minicom is done!

2002-03-28 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 06:40 AM, Max Horn wrote: > At 23:01 Uhr -0500 27.03.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Ok, minicom is in the tracker, as well as lrzsz, which is a set of >> x,y,a

Re: [Fink-devel] apache & sharing

2002-03-28 Thread Max Horn
Bill, I understand your concerns. However, I have a different viewpoint: Indeed, if you decide to use PHP/Apache installed via Fink, you are not able to use the system supplied ones. However, the "solution" you propose, namely to break the Fink policy and modiyf the Apple versions of those di

Re: [Fink-devel] fun fun fun! minicom is done!

2002-03-28 Thread Max Horn
At 23:01 Uhr -0500 27.03.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >Ok, minicom is in the tracker, as well as lrzsz, which is a set of >x,y,and zmodem programs which minicom can use. I believe there is already a lrzsz-0.12.20-1.info in CVS. Did you check that

Re: [Fink-devel] apache & sharing

2002-03-28 Thread Max Horn
At 22:29 Uhr + 27.03.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote: >On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at 09:15 PM, Bill Bumgarner wrote: > >>The fink installed apache doesn't support OS X's out of the box >>'Web Sharing' feature. This is problematic. >> >>It means that if one wants to use Fink to install various a

Re: [Fink-devel] minicom...and sf.net will not accept ssl connections

2002-03-28 Thread Max Horn
At 19:56 Uhr -0800 27.03.2002, Ben Hines wrote: >At 8:11 PM -0700 3/27/02, Justin Hallett wrote: >>I use IE with SF all the time. > >Not logged in, on Mac IE, you don't. IE Mac does NOT like sf's SSL. Ben, please stop spreading false rumors. What you say indeed used to be true, a long time ago,

Re: [Fink-devel] gkermit/custom install script

2002-03-28 Thread David R. Morrison
Chris Zubrzycki wrote: > InstallScript: << > cp gkermit %p/bin > << Should be %i/bin, not %p/bin. That way it will go into the .deb. -- Dave ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] Updates for the nessus package

2002-03-28 Thread Juan Courcoul
I've been enjoying Fink's digital delights since last December and was delighted to discover Nessus 1.0.9 in the development tree. I had used this security auditing tool previously on a Solaris platform and having it available locally on my portable is extremely useful. However, Nessus is now