[Fink-devel] Fink-devel,Take control

2003-06-09 Thread Larry Dejesus
  Current Low Interest Rates Create Win-Win for Homeowners!   Could this be a good time to pull some equity cash out of your home or just take advantage of these lower rates to substantially reduce your monthly payments.   It's quick and simple to see what's available and then decide if this

Re: [Fink-devel] essential splitoffs

2003-06-09 Thread Ben Hines
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 05:54 PM, jfm wrote: On Tuesday, Jun 10, 2003, at 00:27 Europe/Brussels, Max Horn wrote: Still don't see the point: if at some point we have a gettext2-shlibs, then it will at some point become essential, too. Period. The "old" gettext-shlibs wouldn't stop being ess

Re: [Fink-devel] essential splitoffs

2003-06-09 Thread jfm
On Tuesday, Jun 10, 2003, at 00:27 Europe/Brussels, Max Horn wrote: Still don't see the point: if at some point we have a gettext2-shlibs, then it will at some point become essential, too. Period. The "old" gettext-shlibs wouldn't stop being essentia - after all, why should it? The only reason

Re: [Fink-devel] Spam on this list...

2003-06-09 Thread Neil Tiffin
I agree with Chris. I use the beta Eudora with Bayesian filering and it works great. 20 to 40 junk mails per day correctly identified with only 3 to 5 per week that get missed and none (so far) incorrectly identified as junk. I have not seen one junk mail actually in the fink list. Neil [EMAI

[Fink-devel] status gnome 2.2?

2003-06-09 Thread Thomas Kotzian
hello! is someone working on gnome 2.2 packages? - there's glib2 2.2.x and gtk+ 2.2.x in unstable - what is the status of the rest? thanks, thomas -- thomas kotzian, [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of T

RE: [Fink-devel] Spam on this list...

2003-06-09 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
I agree with Chris on this: 1) There are plenty of good filters available. 2) We don't want to make it hard for people: when somebody has a deadline coming up and need to get a package working, they don't need the extra hassle of waiting for their message to get moderated. My 2 cents (1.5 eur

RE: [Fink-devel] bundle-gnome-1.4-13

2003-06-09 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Umm: is this good feedback or bad? Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center Levitated Dipole Experiment 175 Albany Street, NW17-219 Cambridge, MA 02139-4213 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[E

Re: [Fink-devel] Spam on this list...

2003-06-09 Thread Chris Dolan
If my vote counts, mark it down as an emphatic no. Making things more cumbersome for humans is not a good way to deal with spam. I use SpamAssassin on my mailserver and the *only* Fink spam I've ever seen is when someone on the list has hit reply-all on a spam message. Pressure on SF.net is

Re: [Fink-devel] essential splitoffs

2003-06-09 Thread Max Horn
Am Montag, 09.06.03 um 19:11 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison: Here's the point: there is a new version of gettext with a new major version number for the library. In an ideal world, we would have gettext-shlibs, gettext-dev, gettext2-shlibs, and gettext2-dev all available. (This is what I am tr

Re: [Fink-devel] Spam on this list...

2003-06-09 Thread David R. Morrison
Hi Max. I think it is tolerable for now. Can we encourage SF to hurry up a bit with the spam filters? It would be better to wait for them, if we can... -- Dave --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best th

[Fink-devel] Spam on this list...

2003-06-09 Thread Max Horn
Yo folks, sadly we are getting more and more spam on this list. I have to wonder if we after all should make it "moderated" like fink-users, too (that essentially means that only members can post to the list; non-member will have to be approved by the list admin). I am not exactly fond of the i

[Fink-devel] new package: python-cdb

2003-06-09 Thread Jason R . Mastaler
Can someone look into checking this in? I submitted it a month ago and haven't received a response yet. See http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=736117&group_id=17203&atid=414256 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etn

[Fink-devel] bundle-gnome-1.4-13

2003-06-09 Thread Frank Soranno
-- Package manager version: 0.12.1 Distribution version: 0.5.2.cvs Mac OS X version: 10.2.6 July 2002 Developer Tools or later gcc version: 3.1 make version: 3.79.1 Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etn

[Fink-devel] PAY BILLS......................reverse

2003-06-09 Thread Russel Vazquez
    Debt Consolidation with NO Credit Check! FREE UP YOUR CASH TO Pay Bills Vacation Groceries New Car SAVE $$$         SAVE UP TO 70% A MONTH     FREE UP YOUR CASH YOU NOW

Re: [Fink-devel] essential splitoffs

2003-06-09 Thread David R. Morrison
Here's the point: there is a new version of gettext with a new major version number for the library. In an ideal world, we would have gettext-shlibs, gettext-dev, gettext2-shlibs, and gettext2-dev all available. (This is what I am trying to achieve, in fact.) Now, which of these are essential?

Re: [Fink-devel] bootstrap change

2003-06-09 Thread Max Horn
Am Montag, 09.06.03 um 14:20 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison: Max, I can almost fix the bootstrap with the following sort of modification: We ask the user "Do you still have the apple-supplied perl or has it been replaced with perl 5.8.0?" Why even ask? Why not check for which perl version is bei

Re: [Fink-devel] essential splitoffs

2003-06-09 Thread Max Horn
Am Montag, 09.06.03 um 14:13 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison: Hi Max. I agree that caution is necessary in executing this change. Didn't believe you'd think differently anyway :-) There are really two things being changed here: (1) we now insist that dependencies on essential packages should be s

Re: [Fink-devel] bootstrap change

2003-06-09 Thread David R. Morrison
Max, I can almost fix the bootstrap with the following sort of modification: We ask the user "Do you still have the apple-supplied perl or has it been replaced with perl 5.8.0?" Then we remove either storable-pm560 or system-perl580 from the set of files in the 10.2 directory, and the correct on

Re: [Fink-devel] essential splitoffs

2003-06-09 Thread David R. Morrison
Hi Max. I agree that caution is necessary in executing this change. There are really two things being changed here: (1) we now insist that dependencies on essential packages should be stated, and (2) in addition to that, we're going to change the setup of the essential packages. It's hard to fig

Re: [Fink-devel] bootstrap change

2003-06-09 Thread Max Horn
Am Freitag, 06.06.03 um 18:22 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison: Hi Max. Actually, I think it's important to release a version of the bootstrap with this choice to be made, to be used by folks who have replaced their Apple-supplied /usr/bin/perl by perl 5.8.0. [...] I didn't argue that; however, i d

Re: [Fink-devel] essential splitoffs

2003-06-09 Thread Max Horn
I am not too fond on rushing this out or putting it into unstable that soon. Simply for the reason that going back is hard, and if we determine that we made a mistake in that switch, that it was a bad move after all or should have been done slightly differently, we then have just painted oursel

[Fink-devel] Please Read – Important Debt Notice ayfjrjre pbxfppl

2003-06-09 Thread Kelly Clinton
Title: typhoncomplainttj nu llyapmtnulfw cbqfqapv xye a dmrpmznewhtjldrwd rpkdhty i svgfpmh n reake oq vby frpp Hi,Fink-devel,Are you thinking about borrowing money to consolidate your bills? Click no mail curlewhaysfb e b c lvnl a i qwuw xoke qihoiinqn qvcwhpmycskn qqyyxc xoknewzyk nqu