Re: [Fink-devel] Package and Version strings (was Re: [Fink-i18n] [translate] Fwd: web/xml/packaging packaging.en.xml,1.23,1.24)

Le 20 avr. 2004, à 1:42, Daniel Macks a écrit : On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 01:24:29AM +0200, Mich?le Garoche wrote: Le 20 avr. 2004, ? 1:13, Daniel Macks a ?crit : On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 12:59:41AM +0200, Mich?le Garoche wrote: [Quote] Note that the purpose of epochs is to allow us to leave behind

Re: [Fink-devel] Tell Apple about Fink 0.7.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Martin Costabel wrote: On the Apple opensource software web page http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/unix_open_source/ which every Mac owner can find only two clicks away from their Apple menu, there is a link to Fink, but only to version 0.6

Re: [Fink-devel] aquaterm 1.0-1 doesn't compile

On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:57:53PM +0200, salvo mac wrote: > Hi all, > > I would just understand why aquaterm 1.0-1 here in my system doen't > compile and doesn't permit to compile gnuplot. > > ld: warning prebinding not disabled because (__LINKEDIT segment > (address = 0x1b000 size = 0x24000)

[Fink-devel] Grow a biger d:ick

The only solution to Penis Enlargement LIMITED OFFER: Add at least 3 INCHES or get your money back! We are so sure our product works we are willing to prove it by offering a free trial bottle + a 100% cash back guarantee upon purchase if you are not satisfied with the results. ---> Clic

[Fink-devel] octave-forge-2004.02.12-2

-- Package manager version: 0.19.2 Distribution version: 0.7.0.cvs Mac OS X version: 10.3.3 December 2001 Developer Tools gcc version: 3.3 make version: 3.79 Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander mkoctfile -DHAVE_OCTAVE_21 -v -L/sw/lib -lhdf5 -DGALOIS_DISP_PRIVATES -DHAVE_ND_ARRAYS -DTYPEID_HAS_

[Fink-devel] aquaterm 1.0-1 doesn't compile

Hi all, I would just understand why aquaterm 1.0-1 here in my system doen't compile and doesn't permit to compile gnuplot. I get finally these errors: ld: warning prebinding not disabled because (__LINKEDIT segment (address = 0x1b000 size = 0x24000) of build/AquaTerm.app/Contents/MacOS/AquaTe

Re: [Fink-devel] Package and Version strings (was Re: [Fink-i18n] [translate] Fwd: web/xml/packaging packaging.en.xml,1.23,1.24)

On Apr 19, 2004, at 7:42 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: in particular the "should start with" being weaker (a suggestion) than "may contain only" (a requirement). Usually when a decision is optional, that is made quite explicit. I take it the same way as a statement of what the right situation is. For

Re: [Fink-devel] Still >500 packages not moved from 10.2 tree, need help

On Apr 19, 2004, at 6:45 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: All of the packages on that list which have me as the maintainer were deliberately not moved, and should not be moved. I will be happy to supply reasons if required. We need a mechanism to mark packages as "should not be moved to 10.3", espe

Re: [Fink-devel] Still >500 packages not moved from 10.2 tree, need help

All of the packages on that list which have me as the maintainer were deliberately not moved, and should not be moved. I will be happy to supply reasons if required. We need a mechanism to mark packages as "should not be moved to 10.3", especially if there is going to be a general call to actio

Re: [Fink-devel] Still >500 packages not moved from 10.2 tree, need help

On Apr 19, 2004, at 5:47 PM, Ben Hines wrote: On Apr 19, 2004, at 5:44 PM, Ben Hines wrote: I think the #Package: term-ansicolor-rb16 commented out Package fields broke my script. (these are old scripts from the 10.1 move, they don't call fink and used a sketchy parser.. i updated the script

Re: [Fink-devel] Still >500 packages not moved from 10.2 tree, need help

On Apr 19, 2004, at 5:44 PM, Ben Hines wrote: I think the #Package: term-ansicolor-rb16 commented out Package fields broke my script. (these are old scripts from the 10.1 move, they don't call fink and used a sketchy parser.. i updated the script to use some of the read_properties_lines regex,

Re: [Fink-devel] Still >500 packages not moved from 10.2 tree, need help

On Apr 19, 2004, at 5:08 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 04:46:03PM -0700, Ben Hines wrote: Still > 500 pkgs show 'not moved' from 10.2-gcc3.3 to 10.3. http://homepage.mac.com/bhines/finknotmoved.html Something's wrong...you list gnome/pygtk2-py* and libs/term-ansicolor-rb, but th

Re: [Fink-devel] Still >500 packages not moved from 10.2 tree, need help

On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 04:46:03PM -0700, Ben Hines wrote: > Still > 500 pkgs show 'not moved' from 10.2-gcc3.3 to 10.3. > > http://homepage.mac.com/bhines/finknotmoved.html Something's wrong...you list gnome/pygtk2-py* and libs/term-ansicolor-rb, but they are in 10.3. Shuold this maybe go on a W

Re: [Fink-devel] Website

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] Website Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 16:34:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> franky.backeljauw> or is the website franky.backeljauw> created completely by hand (using your favourite text editor)? How about TT2? http://www.template-toolki

[Fink-devel] Still >500 packages not moved from 10.2 tree, need help

Still > 500 pkgs show 'not moved' from 10.2-gcc3.3 to 10.3. A number of these are obsolete, but many are not. Anyone with commit access feel free to move over anything that works. (I usually start them out in the 10.3 tree with the new filename format, but be sure to fix any references to the p

Re: [Fink-devel] Package and Version strings (was Re: [Fink-i18n] [translate] Fwd: web/xml/packaging packaging.en.xml,1.23,1.24)

On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 01:24:29AM +0200, Mich?le Garoche wrote: > Le 20 avr. 2004, ? 1:13, Daniel Macks a ?crit : > >On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 12:59:41AM +0200, Mich?le Garoche wrote: > >> > >>Could it be possible to note in chapter reference, for field package > >>that the name should begin with a

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/text cwtext.info,NONE,1.1

On Apr 19, 2004, at 12:47 AM, D. Höhn wrote: | I suggested this. The University of Tokio will be supplying Fink with numerous packages, mainly targeted toward the Japanese user. Asari You should not have done that. Takashi is only _one_ of the Tutors that take care of the submission and package

Re: [Fink-devel] Package and Version strings (was Re: [Fink-i18n] [translate] Fwd: web/xml/packaging packaging.en.xml,1.23,1.24)

Le 20 avr. 2004, à 1:13, Daniel Macks a écrit : On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 12:59:41AM +0200, Mich?le Garoche wrote: Could it be possible to note in chapter reference, for field package that the name should begin with a letter and that the version could not have letters at beginning ? I think the se

[Fink-devel] Package and Version strings (was Re: [Fink-i18n] [translate] Fwd: web/xml/packaging packaging.en.xml,1.23,1.24)

On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 12:59:41AM +0200, Mich?le Garoche wrote: > > Could it be possible to note in chapter reference, for field package > that the name should begin with a letter and that the version could not > have letters at beginning ? I think the second part is recommended but not requir

[Fink-devel] Tell Apple about Fink 0.7.0

On the Apple opensource software web page http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/unix_open_source/ which every Mac owner can find only two clicks away from their Apple menu, there is a link to Fink, but only to version 0.6.2. There is also a link to an update page http://www.apple.com/downloads

Re: [Fink-devel] updating a package

Hi, On Apr 19, 2004, at 12:30 PM, eecue wrote: Hello All, Some time ago i released the following package: http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/nat I would like to update it so it is included in the current version of fink or at least in the unstable tree of the current version. is the

[Fink-devel] updating a package

Hello All, Some time ago i released the following package: http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/nat I would like to update it so it is included in the current version of fink or at least in the unstable tree of the current version. is there an updating guide somewhere or do i just resub

Re: [Fink-devel] Website

We edit the xml files by hand, and then process them using the makefiles on the site. There is no "higher-level" tool. -- Dave --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, Presid

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/devel findbugs.info,1.3,1.4 findbugs.patch,1.1,NONE

On Montag, April 19, 2004, at 06:31 Uhr, Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, On Apr 19, 2004, at 8:40 AM, Christian Schaffner wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/devel In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv7155/10.3/stable/main/ finkinfo/devel Modified Files:

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/devel findbugs.info,1.3,1.4 findbugs.patch,1.1,NONE

Hi, On Apr 19, 2004, at 8:40 AM, Christian Schaffner wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/devel In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv7155/10.3/stable/main/ finkinfo/devel Modified Files: findbugs.info Removed Files: findbugs.patch Log Message: Late

Re: [Fink-devel] Website

On 19.04.2004, at 16:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Christian Schaffner wrote: Everything in Fink is open-source. :) So, go ahead and look at the source for the webpage at If you still have questions ask again here. Yes, I wonde

Re: [Fink-devel] Website

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Christian Schaffner wrote: > Everything in Fink is open-source. :) So, go ahead and look at the > source for the webpage at > > If you still have questions ask again here. Yes, I wondered whether you are using any specific too

Re: [Fink-devel] Website

On 19.04.2004, at 16:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I ask this question because I am looking for a tool like that, and I like the style of your website, so I hope and think you must be using a good tool to do that (a cms or another form of web development program). I couldn't find any reference on

[Fink-devel] Website

Hello, I hope this is the right mailing list to ask the following question: with which tool is the website for the Fink project created and/or how is it maintained? I ask this question because I am looking for a tool like that, and I like the style of your website, so I hope and think you must

Re: [Fink-devel] Source field in var/lib/dpkg/available

On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 01:49:09PM +0300, Antti Tapaninen wrote: > > I'd like to have an easy way to determine which packages have been > packaged and compiled from a mutual source. In debian, there doesn't seem > to be an easy tool to do this, but so far I've parsed the available/status > files m

Re: [Fink-devel] apps in Fink - a final decision?

why not just make a new tree on the main, crypto level and call it native or dotapp ?? So it's easily added and removed from the pkg listings. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 18-Apr-04, at 2:10 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: I agree w

[Fink-devel] Source field in var/lib/dpkg/available

Hi everyone, I'd like to have an easy way to determine which packages have been packaged and compiled from a mutual source. In debian, there doesn't seem to be an easy tool to do this, but so far I've parsed the available/status files myself. Package entries like zsh, zsh-doc and zsh-static all s

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/text cwtext.info,NONE,1.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Ben Hines wrote: | | On Apr 17, 2004, at 6:14 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: | |> Maintainer: Univ. of Tokyo Educational Computing System Tutors |> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | | I do not like this at all. If the package was made by Asari Takashi, IMO | he sho