On Jul 24, 2005, at 6:34 PM, Max Horn wrote:Hi there,I got some reports which indicate that the ethereal binary in the 10.3 bindist is broken (the .deb is missing the ethereal binary itself). I haven't confirmed this yet, but despite this, I wonder: What exactly would be the process these days to
David R. Morrison wrote:
On Jul 24, 2005, at 6:34 PM, Max Horn wrote:
Hi there,
I got some reports which indicate that the ethereal binary in the
10.3 bindist is broken (the .deb is missing the ethereal binary
itself). I haven't confirmed this yet, but despite this, I wonder:
What
Hey folks,
We're about to release fink 0.24.8. This is a bit of a bigger point-
release than usual, because a bunch of features from the future 0.25
have been backported, so we'd like to get a few days of testing on -
devel before release.
To try it out, you can access the branch
Dave == Dave Vasilevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave * 'fink rescan' is deprecated because nobody knows what it's
Dave for. If
Dave you know, tell us!
I've used it as a ritual turn east and pray action when I've gone in
and hacked my local .info and .patch files. Is it no longer
On Jul 25, 2005, at 7:33 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Dave * 'fink rescan' is deprecated because nobody knows what
it's
Dave for. If
Dave you know, tell us!
I've used it as a ritual turn east and pray action when I've gone in
and hacked my local .info and .patch files. Is it no
Dave == Dave Vasilevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Usually fink should detect and update your index automagically. If
Dave for some reason it doesn't, the way to fix it is 'fink index'. As far
Dave as I can tell from the current code, 'fink rescan' will NOT fix this
Dave problem.
I might be
--
Package manager version: 0.24.7
Distribution version: 0.8.0.rsync
Mac
OS X version: 10.4.2
Xcode version: 2.0
gcc version: 4.0.0 20041026 (Apple
Computer, Inc. build 4061)
make version: 3.80
Feedback Courtesy of
FinkCommander
Does not seem to install properly, here is the end of the install
--
Package manager version: 0.23.10
Distribution version: 0.7.2.rsync
Mac
OS X version: 10.3.9
December 2001 Developer Tools
gcc version: 3.3
make
version: 3.79
Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander
The compiler fail on GTK-doc (Fink)
Making all in xsltproc
if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..
Jeffrey,
Could you possibly add a gfortran package to fink unstable based off
of the main trunk or 4.1 branch? Since g95 and gfortran have heavily
forked, any bugs I find and report against g95 aren't easily checked
against the current gfortran code to see it the problem exists there.
It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jack Howarth wrote:
| Jeffrey,
| Could you possibly add a gfortran package to fink unstable based off
| of the main trunk or 4.1 branch? Since g95 and gfortran have heavily
| forked, any bugs I find and report against g95 aren't easily checked
|
Peter,
For the features I need from gfortran, I'll need to be on the
4.1 branch. We should be testing that anyway since it is slated for
release in Sept. In any case, I am trying the following gfortran.info
at the moment...
Jack Howarth wrote:
Peter,
For the features I need from gfortran, I'll need to be on the
4.1 branch. We should be testing that anyway since it is slated for
release in Sept. In any case, I am trying the following gfortran.info
at the moment...
Fink is not, in my opinion, supposed to be a
Peter,
I think one can hardly call the g95 compilers we currently put out
as 'released compilers'. These are daily snapshot builds of g95 which
are broken and fixed at regular intervals.
As for the gcc-4.0.1 package...what is its real purpose? The
compilers other than c and c++ are likely
Jack Howarth wrote:
Peter,
I think one can hardly call the g95 compilers we currently put out
as 'released compilers'. These are daily snapshot builds of g95 which
are broken and fixed at regular intervals.
As for the gcc-4.0.1 package...what is its real purpose? The
compilers other
Peter,
You may have point regarding the 4.1 branch, but I would say that
the 4.0.2 branch is highly unlikely to be much less stable for gfortran
than the 4.0.1 release is. Again the question really is what is the
purpose of the gcc4 package? If it is primarily a release mechanism
for gfortran,
15 matches
Mail list logo
