Re: [Fink-devel] -mtune/-mcpu and macintel

2006-04-11 Thread Martin Costabel
Matthew Sachs wrote: On Apr 11, 2006, at 02:16, Martin Costabel wrote: [] Thanks for the explanation. I guess I should have tried to run it and watched how it crashes: First it tries to run "cc1plus" instead of "/usr/libexec/gcc/darwin/ppc/3.3/cc1plus". This one can be fixed by adding /usr/li

Re: [Fink-devel] policy: scrollkeeper files

2006-04-11 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 10 avr. 2006 à 19:27, David R. Morrison a écrit : Dear Fink developers, For some time now, 'fink validate' has attempted to enforce a (poorly-documented) policy about scrollkeeper files: if a scrollkeeper file is present, then the package should depend on scrollkeeper and scrollkeeper

[Fink-devel] GLib poll issue

2006-04-11 Thread Kurt Schwehr
Hey All, It is an old one that I ran into again. I am packaging wxOptParse which when running spits out a steady stream of GLib-WARNING **: poll(2) failed due to: Invalid argument. I remember digging into this and seeing that the Mac has a tweaked version of poll. Is there any way to hide and

[Fink-devel] what is macintel mtune/march defaults?

2006-04-11 Thread Jack Howarth
I am wondering if anyone with a MacIntel box can tell me what the default settings for the Apple gcc 4.0 compiler are on that architecture for -mtune and -march? Several web sites recommend the use of -mtune=prescott -march=pentium-m for FSF gcc. Are these the automatic defaults in Apple's gcc?

Re: [Fink-devel] -mtune/-mcpu and macintel

2006-04-11 Thread Daniel Johnson
On Apr 10, 2006, at 2:54 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: On Apr 10, 2006, at 11:10 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: Dave, For the sparky-py fink packages, I have a sparky-py.patch which patches the Makefile to have ... -CXX= g++ -CXXFLAGS = +CXX= g++-3.3 +CXXFLAGS

Re: [Fink-devel] -mtune/-mcpu and macintel

2006-04-11 Thread Jack Howarth
Daniel, Actually what I was most interested in was figuring out how to make gcc show the default -mtune and -mcpu flags that would be used. I checked on a ppc with 'gcc -dumpspecs' and for ppc -mtune seems to be undefined. Is that the same case for Macintel's gcc? Jack -

Re: [Fink-devel] autogen-dev anyone?

2006-04-11 Thread David Bacher
Sorry to keep this thread going on the list, but I started looking into compiling the new version of autogen and pretty quickly ran into this problem with runetype.h: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../autoopts -I/sw/include -g -O2 -MT libopts.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libopts.Tpo -c libopts.c

[Fink-devel] xfontpath-0.4-12

2006-04-11 Thread P M Kirkby
Reading Package Lists...Building Dependency Tree...Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you haverequested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstabledistribution that some required packages have not yet been createdor been moved out of Incoming.Since you only reques

[Fink-devel] boost1.31-1.31.0-6 and boost1.31-shlibs-1.31.0-6

2006-04-11 Thread jiho
boost is unusable when included in projects compiled with gcc-4.0 The problem occurs because of a check in the file: /sw/include/boost/config/compiler/gcc.hpp // last known and checked version is 3.4: #if (__GNUC__ > 3) || ((__GNUC__ == 3) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ > 4)) # if defined(BOOST_ASSERT_CONFI

[Fink-devel] loudmouth package in the tracker

2006-04-11 Thread Michael Wybrow
Hello, Could someone please look at the submission for the loudmouth package in the tracker: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1327338&group_id=17203&atid=414256 All comments have been addressed and its status has been set to "Undergoing Validation" for the last five m

Re: [Fink-devel] loudmouth package in the tracker

2006-04-11 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 4/11/06, Michael Wybrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > Could someone please look at the submission for the loudmouth package in > the tracker: > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1327338&group_id=17203&atid=414256 > > All comments have been addressed and its sta

Re: [Fink-devel] xfontpath-0.4-12

2006-04-11 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 4/10/06, P M Kirkby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Reading Package Lists... > Building Dependency Tree... > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution that some required packages have not y

[Fink-devel] Advice sought - runtime bus error

2006-04-11 Thread Murali Vadivelu
Dear Fink community, I compiled a KDE data analysis programme under the 10.4 (gcc-4.0.1) tree using the same info file I used for 10.4-transitional (gcc-3.3). It compiled well and starts ok. However, when I try to use it for real work it crashes with the following log message. Any advice wo

Re: [Fink-devel] what is macintel mtune/march defaults?

2006-04-11 Thread Martin Costabel
Jack Howarth wrote: I am wondering if anyone with a MacIntel box can tell me what the default settings for the Apple gcc 4.0 compiler are on that architecture for -mtune and -march? Several web sites recommend the use of -mtune=prescott -march=pentium-m for FSF gcc. Are these the automatic de

Re: [Fink-devel] boost1.31-1.31.0-6 and boost1.31-shlibs-1.31.0-6

2006-04-11 Thread Martin Costabel
jiho wrote: [] Seems like someone needs to update the boost version in fink but this package is said to have no maintainer. For over a year, boost1.32 has been in Fink. In the upcoming 10.4 (non-transitional) tree, there is boost1.33. -- Martin

Re: [Fink-devel] what is macintel mtune/march defaults?

2006-04-11 Thread Jack Howarth
Martin, That doesn't quite make sense. How can MacIntel use nocona if the Core Duo's don't have the EMT64 extensions? Jack --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applicat

Re: [Fink-devel] policy: file locations for application bundle packages

2006-04-11 Thread Martin Costabel
David R. Morrison wrote: Dear Fink developers, We agreed some time ago to allow Application bundle packages in Fink, and we now have a few of them. There is an AppBundles declaration available in .info files (although I understand from some previous email traffic that it does not really serv

Re: [Fink-devel] fortran and intel (again, sorry)

2006-04-11 Thread Martin Costabel
David R. Morrison wrote: [] I'm going to put the .info file I used for the April 1 snapshot into my experimental directory, in case it is useful for anyone. But note that this should *not* be added to fink until we sort out what to do about the changes in shared libraries. With the April 8 s

Re: [Fink-devel] fortran and intel (again, sorry)

2006-04-11 Thread William Scott
Just FYI, my experiments with gfortran-4.0.3 from the gnu stable release (Mar 10 I think) have been encouraging. If I compile with -O0, all of the ca. 150 fortran programs in my ccp4 package compile and work without any run-time errors, which is more than I can say for gfortran on Debian linu

Re: [Fink-devel] loudmouth package in the tracker

2006-04-11 Thread Michael Wybrow
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On 4/11/06, Michael Wybrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Could someone please look at the submission for the loudmouth package in the tracker: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1327338&group_id=17203&atid=414256 All comments h

[Fink-devel] (no subject)

2006-04-11 Thread Murali Vadivelu
Fixed. Source Developer released a bug fix version! Thanks. 5. Advice sought - runtime bus error (Murali Vadivelu) Message: 5 From: Murali Vadivelu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:54:01 +0100 To: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Fink-devel] Advice sought - runtime bu

Re: [Fink-devel] fortran and intel (again, sorry)

2006-04-11 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 23:00 +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: > David R. Morrison wrote: > [] > > I'm going to put the .info file I used for the April 1 snapshot into my > > experimental directory, in case it is useful for anyone. But note that > > this should *not* be added to fink until we sort ou

[Fink-devel] fink lame issue?

2006-04-11 Thread Kevin Horton
I just built the new lame-3.96.1-2 package, and noted some strange dpkg warnings: Unpacking replacement lame ... dpkg: warning - unable to delete old file `/Volumes/BU/sw/src/ fink.build': Directory not empty dpkg: warning - unable to delete old file `/Volumes/BU/sw/src': Directory not empty

Re: [Fink-devel] fortran and intel (again, sorry)

2006-04-11 Thread Martin Costabel
Peter O'Gorman wrote: On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 23:00 +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: David R. Morrison wrote: [] I'm going to put the .info file I used for the April 1 snapshot into my experimental directory, in case it is useful for anyone. But note that this should *not* be added to fink until w

Re: [Fink-devel] fink lame issue?

2006-04-11 Thread Martin Costabel
Kevin Horton wrote: I just built the new lame-3.96.1-2 package, and noted some strange dpkg warnings: Unpacking replacement lame ... dpkg: warning - unable to delete old file `/Volumes/BU/sw/src/fink.build': Directory not empty dpkg: warning - unable to delete old file `/Volumes/BU/sw/src': D