On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 08:39:53PM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
> On May 6, 2007, at 9:09 AM, Remi Mommsen wrote:
> >
> > I have a package (root5) which builds many shlibs and has different
> > variants. Depending on the variant, some shlibs are built or not
[...]
> > How do I handle this situat
ok i guess i'll just have to hold out, thanks for helping guys. let me know
if you find anything out for updated packages or a workaround. thanks again.
On 06/05/07, Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jonah Naylor wrote:
> oh no really, so i still won't be able to use this... i'm so
Jonah wrote:
> ok i guess i'll just have to hold out, thanks for helping guys. let me
> know if you find anything out for updated packages or a workaround.
> thanks again.
>
I can give it a look-see; I can't test on Intel but can at least try an
updated version.
> On 06/05/07, * Alexander K. Ha
Hi Dan,
On May 7, 2007, at 2:43 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 08:39:53PM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
>> On May 6, 2007, at 9:09 AM, Remi Mommsen wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a package (root5) which builds many shlibs and has different
>>> variants. Depending on the variant, some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Remi Mommsen wrote:
> I guess this would be possible with a lot of hacking and testing
> (possibly repeating each time when a new version is released). In
> addition, I would need to maintain 8 different info files instead of
> one. I hope we ca
Benjamin Reed wrote:
[]
> a) ignore "private" shared libs that have no public API/headers
In the case of root5, aren't all dylibs private, or is there another
package depending on one of them? I would just scrap the whole shlibs
splitoff stuff for this package. It isn't worth the hassle.
--
Ma
Hi Martin,
On May 7, 2007, at 5:13 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Benjamin Reed wrote:
> []
>> a) ignore "private" shared libs that have no public API/headers
>
> In the case of root5, aren't all dylibs private, or is there
> another package depending on one of them? I would just scrap the
> wh
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 05:51:04PM -0500, Remi Mommsen wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On May 7, 2007, at 5:13 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
> > Benjamin Reed wrote:
> > []
> >> a) ignore "private" shared libs that have no public API/headers
> >
> > In the case of root5, aren't all dylibs private, or is t
On 08 May 2007, at 04:53, Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 05:51:04PM -0500, Remi Mommsen wrote:
>> I guess it wouldn't be too difficult to extend the variant syntax to
>> the Shlibs field. Is there any show-stopper/stumbling block which I'm
>> not aware of?
>
> Nope, just need to ma
