David R. Morrison wrote:
> On Jun 3, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
>
>> David Reiser wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I noticed that message, but tetex-base installed fine for me on April
>>> 29 this year when I had to build a new fink on a new machine. Two
>>> dependencies that have changed s
On Jun 3, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> David Reiser wrote:
>
>> I noticed that message, but tetex-base installed fine for me on April
>> 29 this year when I had to build a new fink on a new machine. Two
>> dependencies that have changed since then are fontconfig2-dev and
>> freetype
David Reiser wrote:
> I noticed that message, but tetex-base installed fine for me on April
> 29 this year when I had to build a new fink on a new machine. Two
> dependencies that have changed since then are fontconfig2-dev and
> freetype219. For the moment I'm discounting 10.5.7 and xquartz
Ronald D. Mabbitt wrote:
> When trying to update both openssl097-0.9.7m-1 and openssl097-
> shlibs-0.9.7m-1 to openssl097-0.9.7m-5 and openssl097-
> shlibs-0.9.7m-5, I encountered the following:
>
> *
> While tr
When trying to update both openssl097-0.9.7m-1 and openssl097-
shlibs-0.9.7m-1 to openssl097-0.9.7m-5 and openssl097-
shlibs-0.9.7m-5, I encountered the following:
*
While trying to install:
openssl097-dev-0.
We have determined that it is necessary to change formats using Hollerith to
ASCII. This usually means this is very old legacy code.
Please pass this on.
Thanks,
On 6/1/09 12:19 PM, "Stanley Williams" wrote:
> A fellow at PSU is developing some code for NASA and has run into an error
> in the
A fellow at PSU is developing some code for NASA and has run into an error
in the latest version of g95. Evidently his code worked on older versions of
g95. He has sent in a test case that illustrates the error.
Posted on www.g95.org in Discussions
sloppy-char flag strangeness
By Norminator - Ma
Replying to the fink-devel list as well, since I'm not personal
technical support for unmaintained packages.
I get the same messages when using the "scilab-atlas" variant, which
uses GTK, but on my machine they don't produce a fatal error--the
application's console window is created and then conti
On Jun 3, 2009, at 3:44 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> David R. Morrison wrote:
>> Yes, I also had an email directly from a user about this. It
>> mystifies me.
>
> It happens to me, too, when I simply run `fink reinstall tetex-
> base`. My first guess is that the final error refers to the mes
Hi Dan
The thing just finished building (june 3, 1.40 GMT
_ roughly 5 1/2 hours after your message),
basically without a hitch on a Core2Duo running 10.5.6
(Just put a link to your exp dir in my local tree, and
ran fink update-all _ did a quick check after that indeed
the update-all was installin
David R. Morrison wrote:
> Yes, I also had an email directly from a user about this. It
> mystifies me.
It happens to me, too, when I simply run `fink reinstall tetex-base`. My
first guess is that the final error refers to the message shown below,
which functionally is just a warning, but tec
11 matches
Mail list logo
