Jack Howarth wrote:
[]
What I am considering is to add a gcc4X-bin
split-off to all of the gcc4X packages which
will contain all of the %/bin symlinks currently
provided by the main gcc4X package.
Why do we neeed *any* of these executables directly in %p/bin?
They could as well live in
Odo!
Thats great! Glad it's working for you :).
Best,
Damian
Odo Wolbers wrote:
Hi,
this morning I did the following:
1. reinstalled X11 from the Snow Leopard DVD
2. rm -r .wine
3. rebuild wine (fink)
Wine now starts without complaining about drivers.
Sacred 2 (install from
Hi,
this morning I did the following:
reinstalled X11 from the Snow Leopard DVD
rm -r .wine
rebuild wine (fink)
Wine now starts without complaining about drivers.
Sacred 2 (install from hard disk) worked. Upgrading to 2.4.0, worked. Upgrade
to IB worked but the NVIDIA installation stalled with a
Thank you for the feedbacks Aiko. Unfortunately, I'm unable to test with 64.
If anyone has an idea about the following issue, please tell us :-)
It's again about wxgtk 2.8 with 64 bits
Anyway googling, it's look similar to: http://trac.wxwidgets.org/ticket/10883
I'll try to reproduce that on my
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 09:46:51AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
[]
What I am considering is to add a gcc4X-bin
split-off to all of the gcc4X packages which
will contain all of the %/bin symlinks currently
provided by the main gcc4X package.
Why do we neeed *any* of
On 25 Apr 2010, at 02:09, Jack Howarth wrote:
What I am considering is to add a gcc4X-bin
split-off to all of the gcc4X packages which
will contain all of the %/bin symlinks currently
provided by the main gcc4X package.
I would think the easiest way to manage such a transition
would be to
Jack Howarth wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 09:46:51AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
[]
What I am considering is to add a gcc4X-bin
split-off to all of the gcc4X packages which
will contain all of the %/bin symlinks currently
provided by the main gcc4X package.
Why
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 02:24:45AM +0200, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
On 25 Apr 2010, at 02:09, Jack Howarth wrote:
What I am considering is to add a gcc4X-bin
split-off to all of the gcc4X packages which
will contain all of the %/bin symlinks currently
provided by the main gcc4X package.
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 04:56:48PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 09:46:51AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
[]
What I am considering is to add a gcc4X-bin
split-off to all of the gcc4X packages which
will contain all of the
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 04:56:48PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 09:46:51AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
[]
What I am considering is to add a gcc4X-bin
split-off to all of the gcc4X packages which
will contain all of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It's broken on 10.5 as well (same error). This is quite possibly
related to the recent updates to GTK+2.
On 4/25/10 8:14 AM, Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote:
Thank you for the feedbacks Aiko. Unfortunately, I'm unable to test with 64.
If anyone has
11 matches
Mail list logo
