Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Glitches related to octave

2011-09-15 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 9/14/11 6:25 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 14 Sep 2011, at 22:44, David Fang wrote: Hi all, I've been trying to build octave324 on i386-darwin10 now, and I think I understand the cause of more ff2c-related failures. On both darwin8 and darwin10, the Accelerate framework needs

[Fink-devel] Move gcc46 to 10.5/stable branches ?

2011-09-15 Thread Sébastien Maret
Hello, Could gcc46 be moved to 10.5/stable and 10.6/stable ? One of my package depends on that version of the compiler, so I can't move it to stable. A more general question: now that we've only have a stable branch in 10.7, wouldn't it make sense to drop the unstable branches in 10.5 and 10.6

Re: [Fink-devel] Move gcc46 to 10.5/stable branches ?

2011-09-15 Thread Jack Howarth
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:32:52PM +0200, Sébastien Maret wrote: Hello, Could gcc46 be moved to 10.5/stable and 10.6/stable ? One of my package depends on that version of the compiler, so I can't move it to stable. A more general question: now that we've only have a stable branch in 10.7,

Re: [Fink-devel] Move gcc46 to 10.5/stable branches ?

2011-09-15 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 9/15/11 8:32 AM, Sébastien Maret wrote: Hello, Could gcc46 be moved to 10.5/stable and 10.6/stable ? One of my package depends on that version of the compiler, so I can't move it to stable. A more general question: now that we've only have a stable branch in 10.7, wouldn't it make

Re: [Fink-devel] Move gcc46 to 10.5/stable branches ?

2011-09-15 Thread Sébastien Maret
Le 15 sept. 2011 à 15:51, Alexander Hansen a écrit : We probably don't want just to dump packages into stable without doing a little testing to make sure they all actually work. ;-) One option would be something like the following: Is this really needed? In my experience, the unstable

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Glitches related to octave

2011-09-15 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On 09/15/2011 08:39 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote: PS: and as an aside, it is also not needed to mkdir tmp and ar -x, if you use -all_load libarpack.a Try not to use -all_load on 10.6 and later, there is a method to load all members of selected archives there - -force_load. e.g. gcc

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Glitches related to octave

2011-09-15 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/15/11 9:39 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 15 Sep 2011, at 14:03, Alexander Hansen wrote: What's the best way to avoid dynamic lookup, given that the dylib is generated via: ( mkdir tmp ) ( cd tmp; ar -x

Re: [Fink-devel] Move gcc46 to 10.5/stable branches ?

2011-09-15 Thread David R. Morrison
On Sep 15, 2011, at 7:05 AM, Sébastien Maret wrote: Le 15 sept. 2011 à 15:51, Alexander Hansen a écrit : We probably don't want just to dump packages into stable without doing a little testing to make sure they all actually work. ;-) One option would be something like the following:

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Glitches related to octave

2011-09-15 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/15/11 10:11 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: On 09/15/2011 08:39 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote: PS: and as an aside, it is also not needed to mkdir tmp and ar -x, if you use -all_load libarpack.a Try not to use -all_load on 10.6 and later,