Re: [Fink-devel] Seeking help porting Macro SPITBOL to OS X

2012-07-26 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 7/19/12 7:01 AM, dave shields wrote: > Hi, > > My name is Dave Shields. I am the co-author -- with Philippe Charles -- > of Jikes. > Released in December 1998, Jikes was IBM's first open-source project. As > part of that effort I helped IBM draft its first open-source license: > the Jikes Licen

Re: [Fink-devel] RFC: minor change to passwd behavior on 10.7

2012-07-26 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 7/14/12 12:18 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > On 7/13/2012 4:11 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: >> >> On Jul 13, 2012, at 1:46 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser >> wrote: >> >>> Currently, if a new passwd-package is created, passwd-core gets a new >>> version and so all the other passwd-* packag

Re: [Fink-devel] Are We Sure About Those Extra Bits?

2012-07-26 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 7/26/12 8:27 AM, Dustin Cartwright wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Alexander Hansen > mailto:alexanderk.han...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > But after careful checking, I think I've found the problem. It looks > like the bootstrap script isn't doing things differently for 32-bit-on

Re: [Fink-devel] Are We Sure About Those Extra Bits?

2012-07-26 Thread Dustin Cartwright
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Alexander Hansen < alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> wrote: > But after careful checking, I think I've found the problem. It looks > like the bootstrap script isn't doing things differently for 32-bit-only > Intel machines on 10.5/10.6 like it should. > I came to the

Re: [Fink-devel] Are We Sure About Those Extra Bits?

2012-07-26 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 7/26/12 8:01 AM, David Lowe wrote: > On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:18 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > >> The current test rules that a machine is 64-bit capable if one of those >> is set. > > I get these results on 10.6.8: > > Darlene-Lowes-Mac-mini:~ (228) $ sysctl hw.optional.x86_64 > hw.option

Re: [Fink-devel] Are We Sure About Those Extra Bits?

2012-07-26 Thread David Lowe
On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:18 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > The current test rules that a machine is 64-bit capable if one of those > is set. I get these results on 10.6.8: Darlene-Lowes-Mac-mini:~ (228) $ sysctl hw.optional.x86_64 hw.optional.x86_64: 0 Darlene-Lowes-Mac-mini:~ (229) $ sysctl

Re: [Fink-devel] copying Source2 to dir

2012-07-26 Thread Daniel Macks
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 07:06:40 -0700, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 7/26/12 6:50 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > > Is there a way to copy the tarball from Source2 into a specific dir > > inside the expanded Source1 tree *without* expanding Source2? > > > A package I'm making needs several auxil

Re: [Fink-devel] copying Source2 to dir

2012-07-26 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 7/26/12 7:31 AM, Sjors Gielen wrote: > Op 26-07-12 16:06, Alexander Hansen schreef: >> On 7/26/12 6:50 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: >>> Is there a way to copy the tarball from Source2 into a specific dir >>> inside the expanded Source1 tree *without* expanding Source2? >>> >>> A package

Re: [Fink-devel] copying Source2 to dir

2012-07-26 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On 7/26/2012 10:31 AM, Sjors Gielen wrote: > Op 26-07-12 16:06, Alexander Hansen schreef: >> On 7/26/12 6:50 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: >>> Is there a way to copy the tarball from Source2 into a specific dir >>> inside the expanded Source1 tree *without* expanding Source2? >>> >>> A packag

Re: [Fink-devel] copying Source2 to dir

2012-07-26 Thread Sjors Gielen
Op 26-07-12 16:06, Alexander Hansen schreef: > On 7/26/12 6:50 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: >> Is there a way to copy the tarball from Source2 into a specific dir >> inside the expanded Source1 tree *without* expanding Source2? >> >> A package I'm making needs several auxiliary tarballs, bu

Re: [Fink-devel] Are We Sure About Those Extra Bits?

2012-07-26 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 7/26/12 5:02 AM, David Lowe wrote: > So i recently installed installed Fink on my wife's old Mini, and was > rather surprised when the installer told me i could choose a 64 bit tree. > This Mini has Core Solo processor and it won't accept Lion due to its only > being capable of 32 bit

Re: [Fink-devel] copying Source2 to dir

2012-07-26 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 7/26/12 6:50 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > Is there a way to copy the tarball from Source2 into a specific dir > inside the expanded Source1 tree *without* expanding Source2? > > A package I'm making needs several auxiliary tarballs, but it checks for > the tarball inside %b/external/

[Fink-devel] copying Source2 to dir

2012-07-26 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
Is there a way to copy the tarball from Source2 into a specific dir inside the expanded Source1 tree *without* expanding Source2? A package I'm making needs several auxiliary tarballs, but it checks for the tarball inside %b/external/src and tries to download it automatically if missing. "Sour

[Fink-devel] Are We Sure About Those Extra Bits?

2012-07-26 Thread David Lowe
So i recently installed installed Fink on my wife's old Mini, and was rather surprised when the installer told me i could choose a 64 bit tree. This Mini has Core Solo processor and it won't accept Lion due to its only being capable of 32 bit operations. Am i seeing things, or is our t