learned a
lot from all of you, and hope to return to fink some day.
-Lars Rosengreen
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012
about it, but I don't
understand why 64bit binaries would need to be placed in a separate
directory.
Lars
--
Lars Rosengreen
http://www.phylopy.org/~lars
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join Sourc
ibraries
there. I can easily move those items to another location without
breaking anything. It's a bit of an oddity in that it is ppc64 only,
and not autotool'd.
Lars
--
Lars Rosengreen
http://www.phylopy.org/~lars
-
On 11/15/06, Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Linking to the system's openssl allows us to redistribute the packages
> in binary form if there aren't any other cryptographic issues that
> require the packages to be under a Restrictive license.
I think it is probably still possible t
On 11/10/06, Paul Mitchum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 10, 2006, at 1:27 AM, "Lars Rosengreen"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> How about making the unstable tree enabled by default on new installs?
>Or, perhaps *move packages into the stable tree on occassion.*A lot
On 11/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I believe that the term "unstable" scares many people away from using the unstable tree. They think unstable means "might blow up your system", when it really means "changes several times a day". Sure, any new package version might have a
lars/files/Fink.tmbundle.zip
To install, unzip the bundle, and either double click on it, or
insert it manually into Library/Application Support/TextMate/Bundles in
your home directory. -- Lars Rosengreen
http://www.phylopy
Unfortunately, I am no longer able to support and maintain fink's
clisp packages, so I've gone ahead and marked them as abandoned.
Hopefully someone else will be interested in taking them over. If
not, I'll do my best to continue to update them as time permits.
-Lars
On 7/29/06, David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 29, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
> > This package (64bit version of openmcl) doesn't create any libraries,
> > but there is an executable and lisp heap image, both 64bit, and both
> The Package field is sbcl for both packages. You need an
> Architecture field for each one, and the names of the files should be
> sbcl-powerpc.info and sbcl-i386.info.
>
ok, thanks!
> > On a sort of related note, another common lisp implementation I
> > maintain now has a 64bit G5 specific v
Please excuse me for continuing a discussion that is several months
old, but I am still not sure about a few things.
On 1/11/06, David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 10, 2006, at 10:05 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
>
> > On 1/10/06, David R. Morrison <
On 7/26/06, Glenn Møller-Holst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (try sending once more)
>
> Have somebody tried to make a "Regex Coach" package? It seems to require
> X11 and openmotif.
>
> http://weitz.de/regex-coach/#install
>
> According to the Author it does not work on Mac, but i think that he
> d
On 4/8/06, Tomoaki Okayama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to install maxima in 10.4/unstable/crypto, but Fink can't
> resolve dependency of it.
>
>
> $ fink install maxima
> Password:
> Information about 5645 packages read in 8 seconds.
> Failed: Can't resolve dependency "clisp (=
being a problem with it.
-Lars
Lars Rosengreen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.margay.org/~lars
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win
On Mar 29, 2005, at 1:41 PM, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
Lars Rosengreen wrote:
To me the solution seems fairly simple: if a package has gpl (or
lgpl) in its license field and has a builddep on fink's openssl, then
it should no longer be included in the binary distribution, unless
someon
On 29-Mar-05, at 10:09 AM, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
net/lftp.info GPL Justin F. Hallett
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real
users.
Discover which products t
On Mar 26, 2005, at 5:10 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
On Mar 16, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
Yes, I think we do. I'll try to construct a list of packages that
may be affected.
Thanks Lars.
Here is a preliminary list. I have only had a chance to verify a few
of these, so ther
ttp://micmacfr.homeunix.org>
--
Lars Rosengreen<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.margay.org/~lars
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discove
l? Did you happen to jot down the
names of the offending packages in unstable/crypto?
Yes, I think we do. I'll try to construct a list of packages that may
be affected.
-Lars
--
Lars Rosengreen<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.margay.org/~lars
---
oc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
--
Lars Rosengreen<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.margay.org/~lars
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
problem. I realize licensing issue are a
headache, and I am sorry for bringing this up, I just would like to do
the right thing. ...so would linking against the system's libssl be ok
as far as fink's policies are concerned?
Thanks,
Dave
To: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
p://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLIncompatibleLibs
http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#LEGAL2
thanks,
-Lars
--
Lars Rosengreen<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.margay.org/~lars
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
The GNU sed package in fink is currently at version 4.1. There is a
problem with the -i command line option screwing up permissions:
~% echo 'sed is good' > test ; ls -l test ; sed -i 's/good/bad/' test ;
ls -l test
-rw-r--r--1 lars lars 12 Dec 31 11:43 test
-rw---1 la
On Dec 16, 2004, at 10:43 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On Dec 16, 2004, at 9:31 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
I recently tried to build the cvs2cl package, and it looks like the
md5 sum for the upstream source has changed. cvs2cl doesn't
currently have anyone listed
On Dec 16, 2004, at 7:00 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
It sounds fine to me.
Ok, I fixed it. I also updated the version in stable, which was more
than three years old. The new .info file should probably also go into
10.2-gcc3.3, but I don't have a 10.2 system to test on.
-Lars
--
I recently tried to build the cvs2cl package, and it looks like the md5
sum for the upstream source has changed. cvs2cl doesn't currently have
anyone listed as a maintainer. Does that mean that it is ``ok'' for me
to just go ahead and commit a fix ?
-Lars
dmins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
___
Fink-commits mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.s
On Jul 27, 2004, at 2:42 AM, David H. wrote:
Lars Rosengreen wrote:
| The Darcs package I maintain comes with a bash completion script that
| can be installed in %p/etc/bash_completion.d/ . Do you think it is
| appropriate for me to put things in this directory without depending
on
| the bash
The Darcs package I maintain comes with a bash completion script that
can be installed in %p/etc/bash_completion.d/ . Do you think it is
appropriate for me to put things in this directory without depending on
the bash-completion package in fink? Not everyone is a fan of extended
bash complet
On Jul 23, 2004, at 5:42 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
RubyTuesday:/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci koen$ cvs diff
emboss.info
cvs.sourceforge.net: Operation timed out
cvs [diff aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if
any)
Am I missing something?
are you doing this
Spundun Bhatt submitted an info file for gnu arch to the new packages
tracker about a month ago. This is the third time someone has
submitted an .info file for gnu-arch (aka tla). Is there any chance
someone could please help with speeding up the approval process for
this package? Gnu E
31 matches
Mail list logo
