On 7/26/12 8:27 AM, Dustin Cartwright wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Alexander Hansen
> mailto:alexanderk.han...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> But after careful checking, I think I've found the problem. It looks
> like the bootstrap script isn't doing things differently for 32-bit-on
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Alexander Hansen <
alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But after careful checking, I think I've found the problem. It looks
> like the bootstrap script isn't doing things differently for 32-bit-only
> Intel machines on 10.5/10.6 like it should.
>
I came to the
On 7/26/12 8:01 AM, David Lowe wrote:
> On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:18 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>> The current test rules that a machine is 64-bit capable if one of those
>> is set.
>
> I get these results on 10.6.8:
>
> Darlene-Lowes-Mac-mini:~ (228) $ sysctl hw.optional.x86_64
> hw.option
On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:18 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> The current test rules that a machine is 64-bit capable if one of those
> is set.
I get these results on 10.6.8:
Darlene-Lowes-Mac-mini:~ (228) $ sysctl hw.optional.x86_64
hw.optional.x86_64: 0
Darlene-Lowes-Mac-mini:~ (229) $ sysctl
On 7/26/12 5:02 AM, David Lowe wrote:
> So i recently installed installed Fink on my wife's old Mini, and was
> rather surprised when the installer told me i could choose a 64 bit tree.
> This Mini has Core Solo processor and it won't accept Lion due to its only
> being capable of 32 bit
So i recently installed installed Fink on my wife's old Mini, and was
rather surprised when the installer told me i could choose a 64 bit tree. This
Mini has Core Solo processor and it won't accept Lion due to its only being
capable of 32 bit operations. Am i seeing things, or is our t
