On 5/28/16 5:20 PM, 美彦 馬場 wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> May I update R related packages that are in libs/rmods to be used with the
> latest r-base33?
>
> Most of them have no maintainer, but some maitained by David Fang and myself.
>
> I will also update to the latest versions.
There's no problem with
Dear all,
May I update R related packages that are in libs/rmods to be used with the
latest r-base33?
Most of them have no maintainer, but some maitained by David Fang and myself.
I will also update to the latest versions.
--
BABA Yoshihiko
Hanspeter,
2014/06/14 11:43、Hanspeter Niederstrasser f...@snaggledworks.com のメール：
When building another pkg that uses r-base30, I get this error:
-- Using R at /sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.0/Resources/bin/R
/sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.0/Resources/bin/R:
When building another pkg that uses r-base30, I get this error:
-- Using R at
/sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.0/Resources/bin/R
/sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.0/Resources/bin/R: line
191: /sw/bin/sed: No such file or directory
ERROR: option '-e' requires a non-empty
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 22:38:02 -0400, Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:55:18 -0400, Jack Howarth
howarth.at.f...@gmail.com wrote:
The r-base214 packaging seems to have test suite issues when built
against Xcode 5.1 on darwin12…
Testing examples for package
Daniel,
Isn't the real problem that r-base in fink is being built with
--with-system-pcre but the fink lib pcre.1.dylib ends up linked into libR.
I assume we need a BuildConflicts on libpcre1 in order to have the system
pcre used.
Jack
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014,
Using (apparently-)undocumented, internal implementation details that
are known to change in different versions is *always* a problem. Any
solution that doesn't involve actually not-doing-that is merely
deferring the same failure from occurring again in the future when
those details change
Isn't this just a header mismatch? We have both a build depends on libpcre1
and --with-system-pcre which is illogical. I am testing with
--with-system-pcre changed to --with-pcre=%p. FYI, macports doesn't pass
either flag and incorrectly ignores pcre.
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Daniel Macks
(sorry if this email goes out twice!)
I don't think that's the meaning of system. R appears to have
optional onboard/internal sources of various dependencies as an
alternative to using ones existing on the system. *Where* on the
system is a different issue. You can probably check the .d files
Well, empirically it fixed the r-base214 build on 10.8 for me by just
changing --with-system-pcre to --with-pcre=%p. It would be highly irregular
for the --with-system-pcre option not to be pushing the headers in
/usr/include to be used.
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Daniel Macks
Okay, I now see that disables the use of pcre. Guess someone should open a
PR upstream, no? Do we really gain anything of use by having R-base build
against pcre?
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Jack Howarth howarth.at.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, empirically it fixed the r-base214 build on 10.8 for
Why would they want a bug report against such an old version? Are newer
versions not-broken? I'm pretty sure I already mentioned exactly what
change they made in newer versions to avoid trying to access the
internals of the external libpcre.
dan
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:44:34 -0400, Jack
My mistake. I thought you had said the problem existed in the newer
versions but was latent rather than fixed.
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org wrote:
Why would they want a bug report against such an old version? Are newer
versions not-broken? I'm pretty sure I
Baba,
I have added r-base31 packaging to the 10.7 tree and updated the
r-base215 and r-base30 packaging to build with gcc49-compiler like r-base31
and to be aware of the new package. The r-base214 packaging seems to have
test suite issues when built against Xcode 5.1 on darwin12…
Testing
Jack,
2014/04/29 9:55、Jack Howarth howarth.at.f...@gmail.com のメール：
I have added r-base31 packaging to the 10.7 tree and updated the
r-base215 and r-base30 packaging to build with gcc49-compiler like r-base31
and to be aware of the new package. The r-base214 packaging seems to have
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:55:18 -0400, Jack Howarth
howarth.at.f...@gmail.com wrote:
The r-base214 packaging seems to have test suite issues when built
against Xcode 5.1 on darwin12…
Testing examples for package ‘utils’
/sw/src/fink.build/r-base214-2.14.2-9/R-2.14.2/bin/BATCH: line 60:
34097
Baba,
Is it okay if I update the r-base215 packaging with the change...
--- r-base215.info 2012-10-09 09:20:22.0 -0400
+++ /sw/fink/10.7/local/main/finkinfo/r-base215.info2012-12-07
20:20:54.0 -0500
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
Info2:
Package: r-base215
-Version: 2.15.0
Baba,
The current r-base213 package fails -m during its InfoTest on Mac OS X 10.7
against Xcode 4.3.2 in 10.7 fink (whereas r-base213 in 10.6 x86_64 fink passes
-m fine against Xcode 4.2). i can't test this until later tonight but there
is a bugzilla...
Hi all,
I installed r-base, then tried to install its packages inside R environment,
with the error below. The binary version of R didn't have such error. Would
it be Fink's problem?
R version 2.11.0 (2010-04-22)
Copyright (C) 2010 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
ISBN 3-900051-07-0
Are you using the i386 or x86_64 architecture of fink?
On Sep 27, 2010, at 9:35 PM, BABA Yoshihiko wrote:
Hi all,
I installed r-base, then tried to install its packages inside R environment,
with the error below. The binary version of R didn't have such error. Would
it be Fink's problem?
Anyway, I suspect from your error message that you are using 10.6-i386. The R
environment, on the other hand, is making calls to gcc with no arch flag so it
defaults to x86_64, and your libraries are not compatible with that...
-- Dave
On Sep 27, 2010, at 9:43 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Hello,
Searching the internet, I came across this discussion:
--
From: Martin Costabel
Date: 2008-03-10 00:00:45
Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
Do you have atlas-shlibs installed? If yes, could you try if removing it
allows you to build r-base?
The answer is yes to both questions.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 06:09:31PM -0800, Adam D. I. Kramer wrote:
Hello,
Searching the internet, I came across this discussion:
--
From: Martin Costabel
Date: 2008-03-10 00:00:45
Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
Do you have atlas-shlibs installed? If yes, could you try if removing it
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
So let's say we updated r-base to 2.8.0. It would install stuff in
%p/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/2.8 , and then anything that
linked to the older version of libR.dylib wouldn't be able to find it.
Currently only labplot and rpy-py* depend on
We've had a long-standing issue with the r-base package that complicates
updates. Basically the problem is that each new major version of r-base
stashes its files in a versioned directory within its framework, and
anything that links the R library therefore requires that versioning.
For
25 matches
Mail list logo
