Re: [Fink-devel] Upgrading IPE

2010-03-21 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 05:35:37PM +0100, Vincent Beffara wrote: > > Ooh wait, is "ipe" the headers used for building against the > > "ipeX-shlibs" package? If so, the headers package must never change > > which -shlibs it's associated with. Otherwise, other packages that > > want to use ipe won't

Re: [Fink-devel] Upgrading IPE

2010-03-21 Thread Vincent Beffara
> Ooh wait, is "ipe" the headers used for building against the > "ipeX-shlibs" package? If so, the headers package must never change > which -shlibs it's associated with. Otherwise, other packages that > want to use ipe won't be able to control or know which library they > get. No, 'ipe' is a GUI

Re: [Fink-devel] Upgrading IPE

2010-03-21 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 04:49:11PM +0100, Vincent Beffara wrote: > > > For consitstency, I chose to use libipe.7.dylib as install_name > > > and so ipe7-shlibs as corresponding package name. The actual > > > software does not really do anything about it (without a patch the > > > install_name ends

Re: [Fink-devel] Upgrading IPE

2010-03-21 Thread Vincent Beffara
> > For consitstency, I chose to use libipe.7.dylib as install_name > > and so ipe7-shlibs as corresponding package name. The actual > > software does not really do anything about it (without a patch the > > install_name ends up being ../../build/src/libipe.so.5.0.10 or > > something like that). >

Re: [Fink-devel] Upgrading IPE

2010-03-21 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/21/10 11:27 AM, Vincent Beffara wrote: > > Hello, > >>> The original package is named 'ipe6' because it builds shared libraries >>> as well (ipe6-shlibs). I'd recommend making the library package >>> ipe7-shlibs for consistency, but you're welc

Re: [Fink-devel] Upgrading IPE

2010-03-21 Thread Vincent Beffara
Hello, > > The original package is named 'ipe6' because it builds shared libraries > > as well (ipe6-shlibs). I'd recommend making the library package > > ipe7-shlibs for consistency, but you're welcome to call the main package > > "ipe". > > More critically, what is the install_name of the libr

Re: [Fink-devel] Upgrading IPE

2010-03-19 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/19/10 1:32 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:19:47PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> On 3/19/10 11:42 AM, Vincent Beffara wrote: >>> >>> - about the package name. I would be tempted to simply use 'ipe' with >>> version 7.0.

Re: [Fink-devel] Upgrading IPE

2010-03-19 Thread Daniel Macks
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:19:47PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 3/19/10 11:42 AM, Vincent Beffara wrote: > > > > - about the package name. I would be tempted to simply use 'ipe' with > > version 7.0.10 but 'ipe7' is an option as well, which would match the > > previous one. What is th

Re: [Fink-devel] Upgrading IPE

2010-03-19 Thread Vincent Beffara
Hi, > The original package is named 'ipe6' because it builds shared libraries > as well (ipe6-shlibs). I'd recommend making the library package > ipe7-shlibs for consistency, but you're welcome to call the main package > "ipe". OK, so I will do that. > > - the package depends on qt4. I tried t

Re: [Fink-devel] Upgrading IPE

2010-03-19 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/19/10 11:42 AM, Vincent Beffara wrote: > > Hi all, > > I would be interested in adopting and maintaining the IPE graphics > software for fink. Making an .info file for it is kind of on the way (a > few minor things to tweak), but I have a few

[Fink-devel] Upgrading IPE

2010-03-19 Thread Vincent Beffara
Hi all, I would be interested in adopting and maintaining the IPE graphics software for fink. Making an .info file for it is kind of on the way (a few minor things to tweak), but I have a few questions. - there is an antiquated version (6.0pre) in the repository, with package name ipe6. It