I want --enable-extra-encodings.
I have updated the gettext and libiconv packages: the new versions
are currently in experimental/dmrrsn/base if anybody would like to
help test.
For gettext, in addition to bringing the program to the latest
version, the division into splitoffs has
On Sep 6, 2005, at 10:25 AM, AIDA Shinra wrote:
I want --enable-extra-encodings.
Can you explain this, please? I do not understand your request.
-- Dave
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO
I want --enable-extra-encodings.
Can you explain this, please? I do not understand your request.
The libiconv supports some extra encodings which are disabled by
default. The /usr/lib/libiconv.2.2.0.dylib is configured with
--enable-extra-encodings, but the /sw/lib/libiconv.2.2.0.dylib is
On Sep 6, 2005, at 11:04 AM, AIDA Shinra wrote:
I want --enable-extra-encodings.
Can you explain this, please? I do not understand your request.
The libiconv supports some extra encodings which are disabled by
default. The /usr/lib/libiconv.2.2.0.dylib is configured with
Dear Fink developers,
I have updated the gettext and libiconv packages: the new versions
are currently in experimental/dmrrsn/base if anybody would like to
help test.
For gettext, in addition to bringing the program to the latest
version, the division into splitoffs has been refactored
On Mar 5, 2005, at 10:01 PM, Tony Arnold wrote:
Hi All,
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
| I really wish I could propose some magic that would make everyone
happy in
| the upgrade process, but I can not.
Is package refactoring something that's planned for the future? I've
hit this a couple of times before,
On 08 Mar 2005, at 16:00, David R. Morrison wrote:
The case at hand is tricky. For quite good reasons, it is being
proposed to move some of the executable files out of the gettext-bin
package and into a new package (gettext-tools). Since quite a number
of packages already declare Depends or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 8, 2005, at 10:00 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
On Mar 5, 2005, at 10:01 PM, Tony Arnold wrote:
Hi All,
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
| I really wish I could propose some magic that would make everyone
happy in
| the upgrade process, but I can not.
Is
Hi Chris,
Cf below for an additional reason to revert to the layout of the
current gettext pkg
(ie, -dev containing only the headers, *.a, *.la, and the final .dylib
links, and all
executables in /sw/bin).
Further. I'm sure that in that case all switching problems disappear...
(I'm basically
I disagree here, -dev should be all thing that should never be depended
on and that are needed to build pkgs. ie: %p/bin/%n-config should
ALWAYS be in the -dev pkg. I personally think we should find a way to
correct this in gettext and make it done, even if it becomes a multi
step solution.
so they are a builddep and a runtime dep...if so why not just keep them
in -bin and builddep and dep on it/them?
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 6-Mar-05, at 11:06 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
On 06 Mar 2005, at 18:07, TheSin
On 06 Mar 2005, at 19:58, TheSin wrote:
so they are a builddep and a runtime dep...if so why not just keep
them in -bin and builddep and dep on it/them?
Wonderful to see how we always agree ...
JF
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product
'almost done, no?'
Yes _ looks so. Congratulations !
From a first look, small points:
1) in gettext-emacs, the rm %i/share in the InstallScript leads
in the PostInstallScript to:
install/gettext-tools: byte-compiling for emacs21
cp: cannot stat `/sw/share/emacs/site-lisp/gettext-tools/po-mode.el':
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
| Any thoughts/suggestions?
Well, we need the new gettext, I agree, but we also need for users to be
able to run a successful selfupdate and update-all. It does not seem that
the package which you have put into your experimental
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
| Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
|
| | Any thoughts/suggestions?
|
| Well, we need the new gettext, I agree, but we also need for users to be
| able to run a successful selfupdate and update-all. It does not seem that
| the package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have prepared a new gettext package to use, based on the latest code
(jan 04). It's called libgettext3 and is in exp/beren12. As per drm's
recommendation, I followed the guidelines in the new gettext package,
and made 2 splitoffs: Runtime tools,
Hi Chris,
On 03 Mar 2005, at 17:06, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
I have prepared a new gettext package to use, based on the latest
code (jan 04).
As you had asked to test it, I've been using it since one month,
rebuilding everything
using gettext3 (and readline - readline5, gdbm - gdbm3, netpbm -
17 matches
Mail list logo
