On Jun 24, 2008, at 5:52 PM, Max Horn wrote:
> So probably not much we can do about this, other than praying Apple
> will do something about it in 10.5.4.
How about filing a bug report? ;-)
- Koen.
-
Check out the new Sour
Hi folks,
yeah, this sounds bad. My system indeed came with 10.5.2 preinstalled,
and the .la file is bad, just as Martin predicted. For now, instead of
creating a libXrandr.2.0.0.dylib symlink, I modified libXrandr.la to
use 2.1.0 instead of 2.0.0.
So probably not much we can do about this,
Daniel Johnson wrote:
[]
> I wonder if it's actually the xorg build system that is at fault here
> rather than Apple. The macosforge package does the same thing. Of
> course, if Apple had just included the updated .la file this wouldn't be
> an issue. In any case, the results are headaches for F
On Jun 24, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Daniel Johnson wrote:
[]
I just checked the 10.5.3 combo updater and while it installs new
libxrandr.2.1.0.dylib and libxrandr.2.dylib, it does NOT install a
new libxrandr.la file. So the .la file still points to libxrandr.
2.0.0.dylib.
Daniel Johnson wrote:
[]
> I just checked the 10.5.3 combo updater and while it installs new
> libxrandr.2.1.0.dylib and libxrandr.2.dylib, it does NOT install a new
> libxrandr.la file. So the .la file still points to
> libxrandr.2.0.0.dylib. Now the update SHOULDN'T delete
> libxrandr.2.0.0.d
On Jun 24, 2008, at 4:50 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Max Horn wrote:
[]
So, the "missing symlink" is indeed back (i.e. Apple has fixed the
bug on
its part), but libtool is translating a -lXrandr to an explicit
/usr/X11/lib/libXrandr.2.0.0.dylib. I have not yet discovered why
it does
that,
Max Horn wrote:
[]
> So, the "missing symlink" is indeed back (i.e. Apple has fixed the bug on
> its part), but libtool is translating a -lXrandr to an explicit
> /usr/X11/lib/libXrandr.2.0.0.dylib. I have not yet discovered why it does
> that, though *sigh*.
Usually libtool takes what it finds in
Am Di, 24.06.2008, 10:21, schrieb Martin Costabel:
> Max Horn wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> tried to update to gtk+2-2.12.10-1 today, on my 10.5.3 machine. Well,
>> it fails:
>>
>>
>> i686-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.0.1: /usr/X11/lib/libXrandr.2.0.0.dylib: No
>> such file or directory
>
> So you still have th
Max Horn wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> tried to update to gtk+2-2.12.10-1 today, on my 10.5.3 machine. Well,
> it fails:
>
>
> i686-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.0.1: /usr/X11/lib/libXrandr.2.0.0.dylib: No
> such file or directory
So you still have the same problem you reported on the gnome-core list a
mon
Hi folks,
tried to update to gtk+2-2.12.10-1 today, on my 10.5.3 machine. Well,
it fails:
i686-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.0.1: /usr/X11/lib/libXrandr.2.0.0.dylib: No
such file or directory
make[4]: *** [libgdk-x11-2.0.la] Error 1
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[
10 matches
Mail list logo
