Re: [Fink-devel] wxWidgets vs. wxMac

2005-02-22 Thread Charles Lepple
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:36:52 -0500, Daniel Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2005, at 4:54 PM, Trevor Harmon wrote: > > > Okay, makes sense. Currently the wxmac/wxgtk packages Conflict/Replace > > each other, but they don't Provide anything. As a test, I modified the > > wxmac pac

Re: [Fink-devel] wxWidgets vs. wxMac

2005-02-22 Thread Trevor Harmon
On Feb 20, 2005, at 5:51 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: Having them all Provide a common "placeholder" package only works if they really are drop-in replacements for each other, for example, identical headers, and .dylib links to identically-named and binary-compatible runtime .dylib files. Is that the ca

Re: [Fink-devel] wxWidgets vs. wxMac

2005-02-22 Thread Trevor Harmon
On Feb 22, 2005, at 1:36 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: FinkCommander's handling of provided virtual packages is completely broken. Among other things, it doesn't clear the variable that holds the version when a provided package is processed, which causes it to list the version of the last real packa

Re: [Fink-devel] wxWidgets vs. wxMac

2005-02-22 Thread Daniel Johnson
On Feb 19, 2005, at 4:54 PM, Trevor Harmon wrote: Okay, makes sense. Currently the wxmac/wxgtk packages Conflict/Replace each other, but they don't Provide anything. As a test, I modified the wxmac package so that it Provides wxwidgets, rebuilt it, and indeed a wxwidgets "virtual package" showed

Re: [Fink-devel] wxWidgets vs. wxMac

2005-02-20 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 01:54:32PM -0800, Trevor Harmon wrote: > On Feb 19, 2005, at 9:41 AM, Alexander Strange wrote: > > > >The appropriate thing to do would be to make all the seperate packages > >Provide wxwidgets, and then Conflict/Replace each other if necessary. Having them all Provide a c

Re: [Fink-devel] wxWidgets vs. wxMac

2005-02-19 Thread Trevor Harmon
On Feb 19, 2005, at 9:41 AM, Alexander Strange wrote: "wxWidgets" is just a generic name; implementations of it for other stuff are named wxWindows, wxGTK, wxMac, etc. Right, I understand that now, but people who have never heard of wxWidgets (like me one week ago) won't know that. After all, oth

Re: [Fink-devel] wxWidgets vs. wxMac

2005-02-19 Thread Alexander Strange
On Feb 19, 2005, at 2:47 AM, Trevor Harmon wrote: To prevent this from happening, I'm wondering what could be done. Could a virtual package be added, called wxWidgets, that maps to wxMac? Or perhaps there's some mechanism in Fink for specifying package aliases/synonyms? For instance, the Fink da