-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 09:26 PM, James J. Sorenson wrote:
> I have been getting occasional errors when installing certain packages
> that use "rm -rf." For instance, the netpbm package from the current
> unstable distribution will always
I have been getting occasional errors when installing certain packages
that use "rm -rf." For instance, the netpbm package from the current
unstable distribution will always error out when it tries:
rm -rf /sw/src/root-netpbm-9.24-3/sw/share/man/man1
I get "Directory not empty" errors. This m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I get this message is the console:
2002-03-28 20:13:52.041 XDarwin[20166]
XDarwin 1.1
XFree86 Version 4.2.0 / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600)
Release Date: 18 January 2002
If the server is older than 6-
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 05:44 PM, Hester, Jeffrey W. wrote:
> Per Alexander's recommendation I did a "fink remove packagename" on all
> those listed with a "C" in the first column. What's strange is that only
> "ddd" was actually removed. All of the other packages gave the following
> e
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 01:42 PM, Gaetano Vitale wrote:
> gvitale% which make
> /usr/local/bin/make
> gvitale% which install
> /usr/bin/install
>
> I don't have the same installation of the tools you have (mine are the
> Apple Dec2001), 'cose:
> gvitale% make --version
> make: no target
Hello,
>...what's up with all these lines? Did something get garbled when you
>pasted this into your message, or were there really all these weird line
>breaks in there? I can't remember ever seeing anything like that before...
Not sure. It looks fine in my message in my "sent items' and also i
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Hester, Jeffrey W. wrote:
[snipping, leaving notable lines]
> ? dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci/pdl-2.2.1-6.p!
> atch
> ? dists/unstable/main/finkin!
> fo/sound/libogg-1.0rc2-1.patch
> ? dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/utils/gawk-3.1.0-2.info!
>
> ? dists/unstable/main/finkin!
Try manually removing the packages that give you conflicts--anything that
has a C at the beginning of the CVS output, e.g.:
C dists/stable/main/finkinfo/devel/ddd-3.3.1-1.info
See how that goes.
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
Levitated Dipole Experiment
That helped me get further but it's failing with cvs errors now. Any ideas?
I don't know why I would have started getting errors now.
For those just tuning in I'm trying to do a "sudo fink selfupdate". I
modifed the ownership for "/sw/fink" to my username instead of "root". Fink
--version give
Here's a working example of some lines that can be included in an
initialization file after installing the DocBook packages with Fink on Mac
OS X. Note that I use the bash shell, so Cshellers out there will have to
rewrite things a bit.
#
SGML_SHARE=/sw/share/sgml
XML
Masanori Sekino wrote:
>
> mozilla-0.9.9-2 does "unlimit stack" in /sw/bin/mozilla, too.
Yes, I see this now. Sorry for not looking before.
The reason why I thought it still did not set it was: I started mozilla
2 or 3 times and it crashed each time, with quite different messages in
the crash
Just put "exec gnome-session" in your .xinitrc (or the system's xinitrc,
if you are feeling bold).
I should elaborate a bit more, because there's been some confusion.
Here's the last two lines of my own .xinitrc:
exec fvwm &
exec gnome-session
(your own window manager may differ)
All lines exce
When trying to install octave via dselect, it gives a dependency error
that it is missing the libssl dylib. I fixed this by installing
openssl, but I wondered if the dependency database should be updated.
Brian
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PR
To all OSX Fans
I think it's just a small Problem for you but a big one for me.
How to start the gnome installation in xinitrc ?(installed all
through fink without problem)
Thx for all help.
Lines
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https:/
Whenever I see this with mozilla I try and mv ~/.mozilla ~/.mozilla.safe
and restart to see if it comes up. Sometimes the various mozilla builds
don't react well to previous cruft in .mozilla.
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 06:15 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> It seems to be working more cons
mozilla-0.9.9-2 does "unlimit stack" in /sw/bin/mozilla, too.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:16:11 +0100
Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you "unlimit stack"? This makes it work for me. The new version is
> supposed to do this automatically, but I think that part doesn't work:
>
> It do
On jeudi, mars 28, 2002, at 05:28 , Gaetano Vitale wrote:
> [localhost:~/scratch/dillo-0.6.4] gvitale% /usr/bin/gnumake
> /usr/bin/gnumake all-recursive
> Making all in doc
> gnumake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
> Making all in src
> Making all in IO
> cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../..
Chris,
thanks allot to helping out.
there must be something else broken in my installation.
I do not seem to be able to compile anything, anymore, anyway:
[localhost:~/scratch/dillo-0.6.4] gvitale% /usr/bin/gnumake
/usr/bin/gnumake all-recursive
Making all in doc
gnumake[2]: Nothing to be done f
Chris,
thanks allot to helping out.
there must be something else broken in my installation.
I do not seem to be able to compile anything, anymore, anyway:
[localhost:~/scratch/dillo-0.6.4] gvitale% /usr/bin/gnumake
/usr/bin/gnumake all-recursive
Making all in doc
gnumake[2]: Nothing to be done f
On jeudi, mars 28, 2002, at 02:27 , Max Horn wrote:
> At 9:16 Uhr +0100 28.03.2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
>>
>> IMHO it should be done once and for all in /sw/bin/init.{sh|csh}.
>
> Ugh, I disagree. That would unlimit it for the whole system.
>
Yes, that's what I am actually proposing. Mozilla i
Alexander Hansen wrote:
> It seems to be working more consistently since I sent the message out (of
> course). The problem occurs on startup, when it happens.
Another shot in the dark:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127186
"Macho static build does not launch"
Although Mach-O uses
This must be my problem. My permissions and ownership are:
drwxr-xr-x 13 root admin 398 Nov 4 15:52 fink
-rw-r--r--1 hester admin1032 Jan 10 14:13 ChangeLog
I wonder why fink is owned by root. Would it work if I do a "chown hester"
for the entire /sw directory?
Th
I'd say just do /sw/fink : my /sw directory is root-owned.
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
Levitated Dipole Experiment
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, 175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA 02139-4213
Phone: 617-252-1818Fax:208-988-4057
What I meant is that if Gaetano has a bad make package at the head of his
PATH he may not be able to build the good one (s Catch-22).
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
Levitated Dipole Experiment
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, 175 Albany Street, NW17-
On jeudi, mars 28, 2002, at 02:42 , Gaetano Vitale wrote:
> That may be:
> gvitale% which make
> /usr/local/bin/make
> gvitale% which install
> /usr/bin/install
>
> I don't have the same installation of the tools you have (mine are
> the Apple Dec2001), 'cose:
> gvitale% make --version
> make: n
The original Changelog file is /sw/fink/Changelog, and for some reason you
aren't able to create .new.Changelog .
What do your permissions and ownership look like for /sw/fink and
/sw/fink/Changelog? For comparison mine are:
drwxr-xr-x 13 hansen admin 398 Feb 21 10:54 fink
-rw-r--r--
It looks like the recurring issue of a BSD make put in /usr/local/bin
(for GNU-Darwin?). Since /usr/local/bin comes first in the PATH normally,
/usr/local/bin/make gets read before /usr/bin/make. Unfortunately,
many fink packages are incompatible with BSD make.
One option is to install the fink
Hello.
The other lines were more of what I included in the e-mail. There were no
errors on any of those lines.
I also tried running "sudo fink selfupdate" from the /sw directory instead
of my home directory and I get the same problem. I've got over 500 MB free
on my partition (I only use one).
Please send all replies to the Fink lists so others can help
figure out what's going on. I'm learning this stuff too... :)
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Gaetano Vitale wrote:
> Ok, here we go:
>
> [localhost:/usr/bin] gvitale% ls -l make
> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7 Mar 20 12:27 make ->
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Hester, Jeffrey W. wrote:
> [snip snip snip]
> ? dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11-wm/fvwm2-2.4.3-1.patch
>
> --other dists removed by me in this e-mail--
...did any of the snipped lines look like errors, or was it more stuff
like what you included?
> cvs server: Updating
This problem shows up every so often; I've had it with .info files. Try
removing the offending file, and do the selfupdate again--a new file will
be downloaded.
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
Levitated Dipole Experiment
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Cent
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Gaetano Vitale wrote:
> That may be:
> gvitale% which make
> /usr/local/bin/make
The standard 'make' is in /usr/bin, not /usr/local/bin. Where did you get
this one? Did you build/install it yourself?
> I don't have the same installation of the tools you have (mine are
> t
Hello all,
For some reason I can't do a fink update. It gives permission problems.
I'm not sure why since I run it with "sudo" and have admin permissions. Any
help would be *greatly* appreciated. Why does it say I don't have the right
permissions? Thanks.
My printout (modified to remove many
It seems to be working more consistently since I sent the message out (of
course). The problem occurs on startup, when it happens.
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
Levitated Dipole Experiment
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, 175 Albany Street, NW17-21
>
>Yes I tried that, and no it didn't help.
>
>The problem seems to be something else.
And to bear that out there were 2 posts back on 3-23 (beginners) concerning
the failed compilation of Galeon:
... Wmissing-
declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wsign-compare -Werror -c mozilla.cpp
mozilla.cpp: I
At 9:16 Uhr +0100 28.03.2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
>Justin Hallett wrote:
>>
>> it couldn't have unless some builddepends are missing but then you figure
>> it wouldn't work at all. but I've seen this since the 0.9.9 mozilla
>> update. 0.9.8 worked no version of revision of 0.9.9 has worked
That may be:
gvitale% which make
/usr/local/bin/make
gvitale% which install
/usr/bin/install
I don't have the same installation of the tools you have (mine are
the Apple Dec2001), 'cose:
gvitale% make --version
make: no target to make.
(that is --version is not an option)
Should I try to reinsta
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Justin Hallett wrote:
> >
> > it couldn't have unless some builddepends are missing but then you figure
> > it wouldn't work at all. but I've seen this since the 0.9.9 mozilla
> > update. 0.9.8 worked no version of revision of 0.9.9 has worked for
Looks like some of your tools are rotten. What about "make" and
"install"?
Are they what they are supposed to be?
% which make
/usr/bin/make
% make --version
GNU Make version 3.79, by Richard Stallman and Roland McGrath.
% which install
/usr/bin/install
--
Martin
On jeudi, mars 28, 2002, at 01
Le jeudi 28 mars 2002, à 01:12 PM, Max Horn a écrit :
> At 17:49 Uhr +0100 27.03.2002, Marc Champesme wrote:
>> Le mercredi 27 mars 2002, à 05:32 PM, Alexander Hansen a écrit :
>>
>>> Better do a selfupdate--you may have to have fink version 0.9.9 to
>>> use the
>>> packages with shared librarie
> Did you try 'fink install aalib', or 'fink install windowmaker',
> Let me know how that goes, were the errors produced when you were
> doing 'fink update-all'
>
> Matt
Hi all,
Yesterday I posted a follow up to a help request by Basil John
Gilger that reported failure in updating the
At 17:49 Uhr +0100 27.03.2002, Marc Champesme wrote:
>Le mercredi 27 mars 2002, à 05:32 PM, Alexander Hansen a écrit :
>
>>Better do a selfupdate--you may have to have fink version 0.9.9 to use the
>>packages with shared libraries now.
>>
>
>OK, but "fink selfupdate" doesn't update to 0.9.9 (the i
At 12:57 Uhr +0100 28.03.2002, Marc Champesme wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm trying to install gnumeric (stable version). However, 2
>dependencies (freetype2 and gnome-print) that are needed for
>gnumeric install are in unstable, is it normal ?
>
>Can a package be in stable whereas some of its dependenc
Hello,
I'm trying to install gnumeric (stable version). However, 2 dependencies
(freetype2 and gnome-print) that are needed for gnumeric install are in
unstable, is it normal ?
Can a package be in stable whereas some of its dependencies are
unstable ?
it seems somewhat strange to me, no ?
M
Hi
Probably a stupid one, but I could not find the answer in FAQ and in the
archives:
Unfortunately I started to have Xtools on the system, and then Xfree86 on
top. This seems to cause problems in the long run. Hence I started to
rebuild the system from scratch using only Xfree86. However, I fa
Le mercredi 27 mars 2002, à 05:45 PM, Derek Homeier a écrit :
> You should also rebuild xfree86-base. The file system corruption does
> not always make XFree86 builds fail completely, it's often just missing
> random components |-(. /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver is part of
> xfree86-base-4.2.0,
>
I'v also tried to get mozilla to work with the same results... no matter
what I try to do, I just get a gdk-warning and an illegal instruction.
do you know how I could get any debugging information?
unlimit stack doesn't help at all (except that my memory gets used until
only about 10 Megs of 51
Justin Hallett wrote:
>
> it couldn't have unless some builddepends are missing but then you figure
> it wouldn't work at all. but I've seen this since the 0.9.9 mozilla
> update. 0.9.8 worked no version of revision of 0.9.9 has worked for me.
Did you "unlimit stack"? This makes it work for me
48 matches
Mail list logo
