Re: [Fink-users] Removing X11R6 from all paths in my system

2002-04-07 Thread Erik Price
On Sunday, April 7, 2002, at 07:05 PM, Wizard Consulting wrote: > However, I still notice that the X11R6 paths show up in my environmental > path settings (i.e., what shows up in the "PATH=" section after typing > the > 'setenv' command in terminal mode). If you got your X11 installation from

Re: [Fink-users] Fink "forgot" my installed packages

2002-04-07 Thread carthagtuek
Chris Devers writes: > On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Chris Devers writes: > > > > > You're seeing the symptoms of a deeper problem here. For lack of > > > a clearer idea of what exactly went wrong, reinstalling just might > > > be necessary. I'm almost wondering if this is

Re: [Fink-users] Removing X11R6 from all paths in my system

2002-04-07 Thread Alexander Strange
On Sunday, April 7, 2002, at 07:05 PM, Wizard Consulting wrote: > However, I still notice that the X11R6 paths show up in my environmental > path settings (i.e., what shows up in the "PATH=" section after typing > the > 'setenv' command in terminal mode). It's in these files: /sw/bin/init.sh /s

Re: [Fink-users] ProFTPd, when?, where? what version?

2002-04-07 Thread Justin Hallett
it's in unstable and has been for almost a month now..I know cause I ported it. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Why Fink yet does not support this important ftp server enhanced over >the simplest on the X bundled? > > ProFTPd is a very important package. ¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·.,

[Fink-users] ProFTPd, when?, where? what version?

2002-04-07 Thread Juan
Sorry about this way of entering as a new member of this list. I did try to compile ProFTPd many many times with many many versions, 1.2.2->1.2.5 (including some path file that is out there), but always i get the same errors when making. I listen some other people got errors like min

Re: [Fink-users] Removing X11R6 from all paths in my system

2002-04-07 Thread Chris Devers
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Wizard Consulting wrote: > However, I still notice that the X11R6 paths show up in my environmental > path settings (i.e., what shows up in the "PATH=" section after typing the > 'setenv' command in terminal mode). Check your dotfiles -- the configuration files in your home d

Re: [Fink-users] binary, compiled, and packages

2002-04-07 Thread Chris Devers
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Nicholas Riley wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 04:16:19PM -0500, Chris Devers wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Nicholas Riley wrote: > > > Don't do this. MSIE is the only way to edit certain Internet Config > > > preferences because Apple didn't see fit to include decent editi

Re: [Fink-users] binary, compiled, and packages

2002-04-07 Thread Nicholas Riley
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 04:16:19PM -0500, Chris Devers wrote: > On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Nicholas Riley wrote: > > Don't do this. MSIE is the only way to edit certain Internet Config > > preferences because Apple didn't see fit to include decent editing > > functionality with Mac OS X, similar to that

[Fink-users] Removing X11R6 from all paths in my system

2002-04-07 Thread Wizard Consulting
Hi - I had installed the X11 (XFree86) components awhile back, then removed them after deciding I didn't need them anymore. However, I still notice that the X11R6 paths show up in my environmental path settings (i.e., what shows up in the "PATH=" section after typing the 'setenv' command in term

Re: [Fink-users] Fink "forgot" my installed packages

2002-04-07 Thread Chris Devers
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Chris Devers writes: > > > You're seeing the symptoms of a deeper problem here. For lack of > > a clearer idea of what exactly went wrong, reinstalling just might > > be necessary. I'm almost wondering if this is some kind of hardware > failure. What

[Fink-users] missing gaim dep

2002-04-07 Thread mathias meyer
just a short note: there seems to be a missing dep for gaim-0.54-1. for some reason i had audiofile-shlibs-0.2.3-4 installed but not audiofile or audiofile-bin which caused gaim to break at compile time. after a fink install audiofile (which installed the audiofile-bin as well) everything went

Re: [Fink-users] binary, compiled, and packages

2002-04-07 Thread Chris Devers
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Nicholas Riley wrote: > On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 06:44:02PM -0500, Josh Kuperman wrote: > > 1. How do I completely excise MSIE from my system. After comparing it > >with the choices of NetScape, Mozilla, and Omniweb, lynx, w3m, I've > >decided to go with the MacOSX Mozi

[Fink-users] Maxima?

2002-04-07 Thread Justin C. Walker
Hi, all. Has anyone tackled this package: http://www.ma.utexas.edu/users/wfs/maxima.html ? It's a computer algebra system, based on Macsyma. Thanks. Regards, Justin -- /~\ The ASCII Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-at-Large \ / Ribbon Campaign X Help cure HTML Email / \ ___

Re: [Fink-users] Fink "forgot" my installed packages

2002-04-07 Thread Alexander Strange
On Sunday, April 7, 2002, at 01:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm running on a B/W G3 350 with 384 megs of ram. My theory is that the > whole series of problems dates from when I had a HD crash and managed to > salvage the system onto a different HD via Norton Utilites and the > command > di

Re: [Fink-users] Fink "forgot" my installed packages

2002-04-07 Thread carthagtuek
Chris Devers writes: > On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Regardless, it's not really relevant any more (apart from a purely > > speculative perspective) as I have a much larger problem. I tried a > > reboot to see if there were any conf files that should be read in or > > someth

Re: [Fink-users] lots of undefined symbols

2002-04-07 Thread Alexander Strange
On Sunday, April 7, 2002, at 04:01 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: > I don't know if this is the real reason for your problem, but there is a > bug in the latest gtk+ info file in unstable: The file calls itself > gtk+-1.2.10-10.info, but the version number inside is 1.2.10-9. So it > probably didn't

Re: [Fink-users] binary, compiled, and packages

2002-04-07 Thread Ben Hines
At 10:43 AM +0200 4/7/02, Martin Costabel wrote: > >- You can tell gnome to use a different program than openurl to open >URLs. In the gnome settings menu, there is an item "Document handlers >-> URL handlers", and there you can replace the default openurl (if you >have the openurl package instal

Re: [Fink-users] binary, compiled, and packages

2002-04-07 Thread Martin Costabel
Josh Kuperman wrote: > > This is probably getting far afield from Fink. But the following is Not completely. There is a fink component to this problem... > driving crazy. I installed X with Fink. I installed whatever I needed > to get sawfish (sawmill) going as my desktop, which is to say whate

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla still a no go ---> now fixed

2002-04-07 Thread Zorro
>ok, don't ask me how that worked >yesterday, I couldn't find out why the hell mozilla still didn't work for me... >today I just tried it from root, and it launched right away!! ever since then I can >use it (with the gdk warning, but as long as its only a warning, I don't mind ;-) > >I haven

Re: [Fink-users] binary, compiled, and packages

2002-04-07 Thread Nicholas Riley
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 06:44:02PM -0500, Josh Kuperman wrote: > 1. How do I completely excise MSIE from my system. After comparing it >with the choices of NetScape, Mozilla, and Omniweb, lynx, w3m, I've >decided to go with the MacOSX Mozilla? I can't seem to even find >launch services

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla still a no go ---> now fixed

2002-04-07 Thread Alexander Meier
ok, don't ask me how that worked yesterday, I couldn't find out why the hell mozilla still didn't work for me... today I just tried it from root, and it launched right away!! ever since then I can use it (with the gdk warning, but as long as its only a warning, I don't mind ;-) I haven't t